Plasma reactor inductive coil antenna with flat surface...

Coating apparatus – Gas or vapor deposition – With treating means

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C118S7230IR, C118S7230IR, C156S345480, C438S710000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06401652

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Technical Field
The invention is related to high density inductively coupled plasma reactors of the type used in semiconductor wafer processing, and in particular to the inductive coil antenna which inductively couples RF plasma source power to the plasma.
2. Background Art
It is difficult to maintain a uniform ion density distribution in a plasma reactor of the type employed in etch and deposition processes in semiconductor integrated circuit fabrication. As semiconductor integrated circuit device geometries become increasingly dense and small, the effect of non-uniformities in plasma ion density in the plasma reactor becomes more significant. Much work has been directed to improving the uniformity of the radial distribution of plasma ion density near the surface of the semiconductor wafer or workpiece. For example, in an inductively coupled plasma reactor having an overhead coil antenna, it has been found that certain multi-radius dome shapes for the coil antenna and for the ceiling provide the greatest uniformity in radial distribution of plasma ion density. This is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/778,051, filed Jan. 2, 1997, by Gerald Yin et al., entitled RF PLASMA REACTOR WITH HYBRID CONDUCTOR AND MULTI-RADIUS DOME CEILING and assigned to the assignee of the present application. Such coil geometries govern the vertical displacement of the coil from the plasma or workpiece and are critical in achieving a more uniform plasma ion density distribution over the wafer or workpiece surface. As circuit device geometries become smaller, variations in the vertical height from the optimal coil geometry have greater effect on plasma processing results. In other words, the process is very sensitive to deviations in height of the coil antenna from the ideal geometry. One consequence of this is that processing performance is inconsistent and not reproducible between reactors of the identical design. It is felt that a principal cause is the variations in coil antenna geometry between different plasma reactors.
A related problem is that in those reactors having a multi-radius dome ceiling of the ideal shape for enhancing plasma uniformity, the coil antenna must conform closely to the ceiling, and must be located close to the ceiling along the entire length of the coil. One result of this is that the coil induces sputtering of the ceiling near the high voltage end of the coil due to the coil's close proximity to the ceiling. Such sputtering produces contaminants that degrade the performance of the plasma reactor. Because of the concerns described above about maintaining a uniform plasma ion density across the wafer or workpiece surface, the proximity of the coil to the ceiling cannot be modified to solve this problem.
Another problem with inductively coupled reactors is that the reactance of the coil antenna is primarily inductive, while plasma ignition is best facilitated by capacitive coupling. As a result, plasma ignition using a coil antenna with certain gases such as SF6 that are relatively difficult to ignite requires a large amount of power, sometimes exceeding the power level of the desired process recipe.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is embodied in a plasma reactor including a chamber enclosure capable of containing process gases, a workpiece support for supporting a semiconductor workpiece within the chamber enclosure, a coil antenna adjacent an exterior surface of the chamber enclosure, the coil antenna having plural windings of a conductor, the windings having a flattened cross-sectional shape defining a major flattened surface thereof generally facing an interior of the chamber enclosure, and an RF power supply connected to the coil antenna.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4123316 (1978-10-01), Tsuchimoto
patent: 4261762 (1981-04-01), King
patent: 4350578 (1982-09-01), Frieser et al.
patent: 4368092 (1983-01-01), Steinberg et al.
patent: 4371412 (1983-02-01), Nishizawa
patent: 4427516 (1984-01-01), Levinstein et al.
patent: 4427762 (1984-01-01), Takahashi et al.
patent: 4430547 (1984-02-01), Yoneda et al.
patent: 4457359 (1984-07-01), Holden
patent: 4512391 (1985-04-01), Harra
patent: 4565601 (1986-01-01), Kakehi et al.
patent: 4572759 (1986-02-01), Benzing
patent: 4579080 (1986-04-01), Martin et al.
patent: 4711698 (1987-12-01), Douglas
patent: 4755345 (1988-07-01), Baity, Jr. et al.
patent: 4756810 (1988-07-01), Lamont, Jr. et al.
patent: 4786352 (1988-11-01), Benzing
patent: 4786359 (1988-11-01), Stark et al.
patent: 4793897 (1988-12-01), Dunfield et al.
patent: 4793945 (1988-12-01), Siren
patent: 4795529 (1989-01-01), Kawasaki et al.
patent: 4807016 (1989-02-01), Douglas
patent: 4810935 (1989-03-01), Boswell
patent: 4828369 (1989-05-01), Hotomi
patent: 4842683 (1989-06-01), Cheng et al.
patent: 4844775 (1989-07-01), Keeble
patent: 4849675 (1989-07-01), Muller
patent: 4859908 (1989-08-01), Yoshida et al.
patent: 4870245 (1989-09-01), Price et al.
patent: 4918031 (1990-04-01), Flamm et al.
patent: 4948458 (1990-08-01), Ogle
patent: 4948750 (1990-08-01), Kausche et al.
patent: 4990229 (1991-02-01), Campbell et al.
patent: 5000113 (1991-03-01), Wang et al.
patent: 5006220 (1991-04-01), Hijikata et al.
patent: 5015330 (1991-05-01), Okumura et al.
patent: 5074456 (1991-12-01), Degner et al.
patent: 5085727 (1992-02-01), Steger
patent: 5122251 (1992-06-01), Campbell et al.
patent: 5169487 (1992-12-01), Langley et al.
patent: 5173412 (1992-12-01), Kiener et al.
patent: 5187454 (1993-02-01), Collins et al.
patent: 5203956 (1993-04-01), Hansen
patent: 5210466 (1993-05-01), Collins et al.
patent: 5226154 (1993-07-01), Kondoh
patent: 5241245 (1993-08-01), Barnes et al.
patent: 5249251 (1993-09-01), Egalon et al.
patent: 5258824 (1993-11-01), Carlson et al.
patent: 5276693 (1994-01-01), Long et al.
patent: 5277751 (1994-01-01), Ogle
patent: 5326404 (1994-07-01), Sato
patent: 5346578 (1994-09-01), Benzing et al.
patent: 5349313 (1994-09-01), Collins et al.
patent: 5392018 (1995-02-01), Collins et al.
patent: 5399237 (1995-03-01), Keswick et al.
patent: 5401350 (1995-03-01), Patrick et al.
patent: 5414246 (1995-05-01), Shapona
patent: 5421891 (1995-06-01), Campbell et al.
patent: 5423945 (1995-06-01), Marks et al.
patent: 5449432 (1995-09-01), Hanawa
patent: 5468341 (1995-11-01), Samukawa
patent: 5477975 (1995-12-01), Rice et al.
patent: 5529657 (1996-06-01), Ishii
patent: 5556501 (1996-09-01), Collins et al.
patent: 5607542 (1997-03-01), Wu et al.
patent: 5688357 (1997-11-01), Hanawa
patent: 5935373 (1999-08-01), Koshimizu
patent: 5998931 (1999-12-01), Donohoe
patent: 6087778 (2000-07-01), Benjamin et al.
patent: 6155203 (2000-12-01), Kennedy et al.
patent: 6164241 (2000-12-01), Chen et al.
patent: 6177646 (2001-01-01), Okumura et al.
patent: 39 42964 (1991-06-01), None
patent: 0 403 418 (1990-12-01), None
patent: 0 413 282 (1991-02-01), None
patent: 0 520 519 (1992-12-01), None
patent: 0 552 490 (1993-07-01), None
patent: 0 552 491 (1993-07-01), None
patent: 0 596 551 (1994-05-01), None
patent: 0 601 468 (1994-06-01), None
patent: 0 641 013 (1995-03-01), None
patent: 0 702 391 (1995-03-01), None
patent: 0 651 434 (1995-05-01), None
patent: 0 680 072 (1995-11-01), None
patent: 0 710 055 (1996-05-01), None
patent: 0 727 807 (1996-08-01), None
patent: 0 727 923 (1996-08-01), None
patent: 0 742 577 (1996-11-01), None
patent: 0 756 309 (1997-01-01), None
patent: 0 807 952 (1997-11-01), None
patent: 0 892 422 (1999-01-01), None
patent: 231197 (1990-11-01), None
patent: 55-9464 (1980-01-01), None
patent: 55-154582 (1980-12-01), None
patent: 57-155732 (1982-09-01), None
patent: 61-147531 (1984-12-01), None
patent: 61-91377 (1986-05-01), None
patent: 61-142744 (1986-06-01), None
patent: 62-12129 (1987-01-01), None
patent: 62-249422 (1987-10-01), None
patent: 62-254428 (1987-11-01), None
patent: 63-9120 (1988-01-01), None
patent: 63-155728 (1988-06-01), None
patent: 64-15928 (1989-01-01), None
patent: 4-94121 (1992-03-01), None
patent: 62-7268 (1997-01-01), None
patent: WO 91/10341 (1991-07-01), None
patent: WO 92/20833 (1992-11-01), None
pat

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Plasma reactor inductive coil antenna with flat surface... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Plasma reactor inductive coil antenna with flat surface..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Plasma reactor inductive coil antenna with flat surface... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2971512

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.