Rating calculations
Here's an explanation of how our rating system works.
The rating scale goes from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest).
Inventor rating questionnaire
Would you give a formal recognition to this person/organization for its patent related work?:
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] I would give my full respect
- [ 4 ] Worth mentioning
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] Most likely not
- [ 1 ] Never
Rate how useful are patents this person/organization has invented/approved.:
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Very useful
- [ 4 ] Mostly useful
- [ 3 ] Don't know
- [ 2 ] A few are useful
- [ 1 ] Useless
Do you think you would do his/her/its job better?:
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] No, he/she/it is a proven expert
- [ 4 ] No, but I could try
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] Most likely with the adequate training
- [ 1 ] Yes, when can I start?
Do you think that the work of this person/organization is useful for the community?:
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Very useful
- [ 4 ] I am not sure
- [ 3 ] Not useful
- [ 2 ] Useless
- [ 1 ] Contra-productive
What is the main driving force for this inventor/examiner/corporation/other?:
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Humanitarian work
- [ 4 ] Protection of idea
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] Money and glory
- [ 1 ] Pure greed
Can the public trust this person/organization?:
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Always
- [ 4 ] Sometimes
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] Rarely
- [ 1 ] Never
Patent rating questionnaire
What is the true purpose of this patent?: Does this patent serve only to stop other inventors persuing an idea, or it is patented to solve a specific problem?
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Patented to preserve knowledge
- [ 4 ] Defensive patent
- [ 3 ] I am not sure
- [ 2 ] Manufacturing base and used to stop/slow down rivals
- [ 1 ] Serves only patent trolls
Does this invention solve a specific problem? :
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Yes
- [ 4 ] It might
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] Bloory idea and bloory practical use
- [ 1 ] Very broad patent, without practical use
If you were patent examiner would you approve this patent?:
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Yes
- [ 4 ] Most likely
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] Probably not
- [ 1 ] Definitively not
Is it obsolete or futuristic?:
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Well ahead of time
- [ 4 ] Somewhat futuristic
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] Somewhat obsolete
- [ 1 ] Completely obsolete
Rate originality.: plagiarist, copy or a brand new idea
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Genial
- [ 4 ] Original
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] Copied from somewhere
- [ 1 ] Already used for thousands of years
How useful is this invention?: Does humanity need patent for this invention?
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Very useful
- [ 4 ] Somewhat useful
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] Somehow useless
- [ 1 ] Completely useless
Rating scheme
We use the following scheme to convert the number scale into descriptive ratings:
4.75 – 5.00
Superior
4.25 – 4.75
Excellent
3.75 – 4.25
Very good
3.25 – 3.75
Good
2.75 – 3.25
Not bad
2.25 – 2.75
Questionable
1.75 – 2.25
Very bad
1.25 – 1.75
Extremely bad
0.00
Not rated yet
All data on this website is collected from public sources.
Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.