Processing chamber for atomic layer deposition processes

Coating apparatus – Gas or vapor deposition – Work support

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C118S715000, C118S719000, C118S725000, C118S728000, C219S451100, C219S465100, C219S466100

Reexamination Certificate

active

06387185

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention is in the field of apparatus and methods for performing Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD), and relates more particularly to Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) Processes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the field of thin film technology requirements for thinner deposition layers, better uniformity over increasingly larger area substrates, larger production yields, and higher productivity have been, and still are, driving forces behind emerging technologies developed by equipment manufactures for coating substrates in the manufacturing of various semiconductor devices. For example, process control and uniform film deposition achieved in the production of a microprocessor directly effect clock frequencies that can be achieved. These same factors in combination with new materials also dictate higher packing densities for memories that are available on a single chip or device. As these devices become smaller, the need for greater uniformity and process control regarding layer thickness rises dramatically.
Various technologies well known in the art exist for applying thin films to substrates or other substrates in manufacturing steps for integrated circuits (ICs). Among the more established technologies available for applying thin films, Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) and a variation known as Rapid Thermal Chemical Vapor Deposition (RTCVD) are often-used, commercialized processes. Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD), a variant of CVD, is a relatively new technology now emerging as a potentially superior method for achieving uniformity, excellent step coverage, and transparency to substrate size. ALD however, exhibits a generally lower deposition rate (typically about 100 A
0
/min) than CVD and RTCVD (typically about 1000 A
0
/min).
Both CVD and RTCVD are flux-dependent applications requiring specific and uniform substrate temperature and precursors (chemical species) to be in a state of uniformity in the process chamber in order to produce a desired layer of uniform thickness on a substrate surface. These requirements becomes more critical as substrate size increases, creating a need for more complexity in chamber design and gas flow technique to maintain adequate uniformity. For example, a 75 mm substrate processed in a reactor chamber would require less process control relative to gas flow, uniform heat, and precursor distribution than a 200 mm substrate would require with the same system; and substrate size is going to 300 mm dia., and 400 mm. dia is on the horizon.
Another problem in CVD coating, wherein reactants and the products of reaction coexist in a close proximity to the deposition surface, is the probability of inclusion of reaction products and other contaminants in each deposited layer. Also reactant utilization efficiency is low in CVD, and is adversely affected by decreasing chamber pressure. Still further, highly reactive precursor molecules contribute to homogeneous gas phase reactions that can produce unwanted particles which are detrimental to film quality.
Companies employing the RTCVD process and manufacturers of RTCVD equipment have attempted to address these problems by introducing the concept of Limited Reaction Processing (LRP) wherein a single substrate is positioned in a reaction chamber and then rapidly heated with the aid of a suitable radiative source to deposit thin films. Rapid heating acts as a reactive switch and offers a much higher degree of control regarding thickness of films than is possible with some other processes. RTCVD offers advantages over CVD as well in shorter process times, generally lower process costs, and improved process control. At the time of the present patent application RTCVD is a promising new technique for deposition of ultra-thin and uniform films. RTCVD is being steadily introduced into the commercial arena from the R&D stages by a number of equipment manufactures.
Although RTCVD has some clear advantages over general CVD, there are inherent problems with this technology as well, such as the temperatures that are used in processing. Larger surfaces require more critically-controlled temperature, which, if not achieved, can result in warpage or dislocations in the substrate. Also, the challenge of providing a suitable chamber that is contaminant-free and able to withstand high vacuum along with rapid temperature change becomes more critical with larger surface area requirements.
Yet another critical area of thin film technology is the ability of a system to provide a high degree of uniformity and thickness control over a complex topology inherent in many devices. This phenomena is typically referred to as step coverage. In the case of CVD, step-coverage is better than in line-of-sight physical vapor deposition (PVD) processes, but, in initial stages of deposition there can be non-preferential, simultaneous adsorption of a variety of reactive molecules leading to discrete nucleation. The nucleated areas (islands) continue to grow laterally and vertically and eventually coalesce to form a continuous film. In the initial stages of deposition such a film is discontinuous. Other factors, such as mean free path of molecules, critical topological dimensions, and precursor reactivity further complicate processing making it inherently difficult to obtain a high degree of uniformity with adequate step coverage over complex topology for ultra-thin films deposited via CVD. RTCVD has not been demonstrated to be materially better than convention CVD in step coverage.
ALD, although a slower process than CVD or RTCVD, demonstrates a remarkable ability to maintain ultra-uniform thin deposition layers over complex topology. This is at least partially because ALD is not flux dependent as described earlier with regards to CVD and RTCVD. This flux-independent nature of ALD allows processing at lower temperatures than with conventional CVD and RTCVD processes.
ALD processes proceed by chemisorption at the deposition surface of the substrate. The technology of ALD is based on concepts of Atomic Layer Epitaxy (ALE) developed in the early 1980s for growing of polycrystalline and amorphous films of ZnS and dielectric oxides for electroluminescent display devices. The technique of ALD is based on the principle of the formation of a saturated monolayer of reactive precursor molecules by chemisorption. In ALD appropriate reactive precursors are alternately pulsed into a deposition chamber. Each injection of a reactive precursor is separated by an inert gas purge. Each precursor injection provides a new atomic layer additive to previous deposited layers to form a uniform layer of solid film The cycle is repeated to form the desired film thickness.
A good reference work in the field of Atomic Layer Epitaxy, which provides a discussion of the underlying concepts incorporated in ALD, is Chapter 14, written by Tuomo Suntola, of the Handbook of Crystal Growth, Vol. 3, edited by D. T. J. Hurle, © 1994 by Elsevier Science B. V.. The Chapter tittle is “Atomic Layer Epitaxy”. This reference is incorporated herein by reference as background information.
To further illustrate the general concepts of ALD, attention is directed to
FIG. 1
a
and
FIG. 1
b
herein.
FIG. 1
a
represents a cross section of a substrate surface at an early stage in an ALD process for forming a film of materials A and B, which in this example may be considered elemental materials.
FIG. 1
a
shows a substrate which may be a substrate in a stage of fabrication of integrated circuits. A solid layer of element A is formed over the initial substrate surface. Over the A layer a layer of element B is applied, and, in the stage of processing shown, there is a top layer of a ligand y. The layers are provided on the substrate surface by alternatively pulsing a first precursor gas Ax and a second precursor gas By into the region of the surface. Between precursor pulses the process region is exhausted and a pulse of purge gas is injected.
FIG. 1
b
shows one complete cycle in the alternate pulse processing used to provide the AB solid material in this example. In a cycle

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Processing chamber for atomic layer deposition processes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Processing chamber for atomic layer deposition processes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Processing chamber for atomic layer deposition processes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2909012

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.