Optics: measuring and testing – By configuration comparison – With comparison to master – desired shape – or reference voltage
Reissue Patent
1995-01-17
2002-06-11
Turner, Samuel A. (Department: 2877)
Optics: measuring and testing
By configuration comparison
With comparison to master, desired shape, or reference voltage
C356S636000, C356S446000
Reissue Patent
active
RE037740
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to automated inspection of surfaces such as printed wiring boards and the like, and more particularly to the automated high speed inspection of surfaces using a TDI sensor as a detector.
A printed wiring board (pwb) comprises a pattern of electrical conductors (made of a material such as 1.4-mil-thick copper) residing on a non-conducting substrate (made of a material such as FR-
4
epoxy-fiberglass composite). During the manufacture of pwb's, the top surface of the conductive material is often intentionally roughened, in order to promote adhesion of photoresist to the conductor. Among the methods of roughening are mechanical abrasion, chemical etching, and application of a textured surface layer by electroplating (as in so-called “double-treat copper”). Each roughening method produces its own characteristic surface texture.
It is therefore a requirement, in the design of a machine for the optical inspection of pwb's that the machine be able to cope effectively with a wide variety of surface textures. It is also desirable, in order that the machine be as flexible in application as possible, that it be able to correctly inspect pwb's in which the conductors have smooth surfaces.
The most common and straightforward way to illuminate opaque optical surfaces for inspection is to provide illumination through the same lens that will be used to view the inspected surface, and to collect with that lens the light which is reflected or scattered from the surface. This method is commonly known as brightfield vertical illumination, or simply as brightfield illumination.
FIG. 2
illustrates the problem which is inherent in using brightfield illumination to inspect pwbs. A copper conductor
8
(shown in cross-section) resides on an insulating substrate
9
. The top surface of conductor
8
is shown to be rough (the characteristic dimension of the roughness is greatly exaggerated for illustrative purposes). Illumination is provided through lens
11
, which is also used for viewing light reflected or scattered from the surface.
Consider now the behavior of this system in inspecting a particular point
13
on the conductor surface. Point
13
has been selected, for illustrative purposes, to be within a small area that is sloped substantially away from level. Illumination rays
1
and
2
arrive at point
13
from the extreme edges of lens
11
. All other light rays striking point
13
will arrive at angles between rays
1
and
2
. The inclination of the surface at point
13
is such that ray
1
is reflected into ray
3
, and ray
2
is reflected into ray
4
, both of these rays lying outside the aperture of lens
11
. All other illumination rays will reflect somewhere between ray
3
and ray
4
, which is to say that none of the illuminating light will be reflected back into lens
11
. Any optical sensor that is placed above lens
11
, so as to view he returning rays, will see point
13
as being black, because none of the light leaving point
13
gets through the lens.
The general point being illustrated here is that when a rough surface is viewed by brightfield vertical illumination, the steeply inclined portions of that surface will tend to appear dark, and the overall appearance of the surface will be strongly mottled.
It is necessary for the optical inspection machine to distinguish between regions of copper and regions of insulator. This is often done by taking advantage of the fact that conductive regions are more reflective than are insulating regions, at least at selected wavelengths. Electronic logic can be employed which identifies dark regions as being insulative and bright regions as being conductive. If an optical illumination system causes conductive regions to appear mottled, then some parts of the conductive regions will be falsely identified as being insulative.
A known cure for this problem is to average observed reflectance values over a relatively large region, so as to take advantage of the fact that the average reflectance, even of rough-textured copper, is often higher than the average reflectance of substrate materials. This method has the disadvantage, however, that it makes it impractical to detect actual missing-copper defects of a size smaller than the averaging region.
Defining Numerical Aperture (NA) of the illuminator in the conventional way, which is to say that NA=sin (&thgr;), &thgr; being the angle between a normal to the surface and the extreme illuminating ray, the NA of illumination should be at least about 0.7 NA, and preferably greater than 0.8 NA. In addition, the illumination should be of constant intensity (watts/steradian/cm
2
) over all angles of incidence (i.e. quasi-Lambertian).
An achievement of the present invention is that, by reducing optically the apparent mottling of rough-textured surfaces, it is made possible to avoid large-area averaging, and consequently it becomes possible to detect smaller regions of missing conductive material.
It is not new to provide focussed illumination from a large range of angles, up to a numerical aperture which may even exceed 0.9. Such illumination is achieved, for example, in brightfield vertical illuminators used in high-magnification microscopes employing high-NA objectives. The best of such microscopes achieve ilumination NA's on the order of 0.95. The intensity of illumination in such microscopes in not, however, independent of the angle of incidence. The falloff in transmission of strongly-curved lens elements at large angles causes the illumination provided by such objectives to be significantly weaker at angles far from the normal.
Thus, the present invention is distinguished by the fact that it provides quasi-Lambertian focussed illumination.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the preferred embodiments of the present invention there is provided substrate inspection apparatus and methods, and illumination apparatus. The inspection apparatus and method includes memory for storing the desired features of the surface of the substrate, and a focussed illuminator for substantially uniformly illuminating a region of the surface of the substrate to be inspected. Additionally there is a sensor for imaging the region of the substrate illuminated by the illuminator, and a comparator responsive to the memory and sensor for comparing the imaged region of the substrate with the stored desired features of the substrate.
The illumination apparatus is designed to provide substantial uniform focussed illumination along a narrow linear region. This apparatus includes first, second and third reflectors elliptically cylindrical segments in shape, each with its long axis substantially parallel to the long axes of each of the others. Fourth and Fifth reflectors are also included with each being flat and mounted parallel to each other and at opposite ends of each of said first, second and third reflectors, and first, second and third linear light sources each mounted parallel to a corresponding one of said first, second and third reflectors with each of the light sources mounted so that it is at the first focus of the corresponding reflector and the illuminated linear region is at the second focus of each of the first, second and third reflectors.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3833762 (1974-09-01), Gudmundsen
patent: 4160169 (1979-07-01), Endicott, Jr., et al.
patent: 4264921 (1981-04-01), Pennington et al.
patent: 4280141 (1981-07-01), McCann et al.
patent: 4314275 (1982-02-01), Chapman
patent: 4319847 (1982-03-01), Howarth
patent: 4348593 (1982-09-01), Seachman
patent: 4375652 (1983-03-01), White
patent: 4382267 (1983-05-01), Angle
patent: 4421410 (1983-12-01), Karasaki
patent: 4449818 (1984-05-01), Yamaguchi et al.
patent: 4500202 (1985-02-01), Smyth
patent: 4614430 (1986-09-01), Hara et al.
patent: 4660066 (1987-04-01), Reid
patent: 4692690 (1987-09-01), Hara et al.
patent: 4718767 (1988-01-01), Hazama
patent: 4735497 (1988-04-01), Elterman
patent: 4761681 (1988-08-01), Reid
patent: 4806774 (1989-02-01), Lin et al.
patent: 4845558 (
Bell William
Chadwick Curt H.
Fein Michael E.
Greene John D.
Harvey David J.
Burns Doane Swecker & Mathis
KLA-Tencor Corporation
Turner Samuel A.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for optical inspection of substrates does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for optical inspection of substrates, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for optical inspection of substrates will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2926515