Adhesive bonding and miscellaneous chemical manufacture – Differential fluid etching apparatus – With microwave gas energizing means
Reexamination Certificate
1999-10-05
2002-04-23
Lund, Jeffrie R. (Department: 1763)
Adhesive bonding and miscellaneous chemical manufacture
Differential fluid etching apparatus
With microwave gas energizing means
C118S7230CB, C315S111810
Reexamination Certificate
active
06375790
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the field of gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) smoothing of surfaces.
Surfaces of microelectronic materials such as semiconductors, dielectrics and metals (often as thin films on a substrate) need to be smoothed after their fabrication by deposition, crystal growth, etching or similar processing. The close proximity of microelectronic components, either as multiple layers or as interacting/interconnected subcomponents requires a high figure of merit for surface quality.
Smoothing methods can be classed roughly as mechanical or chemical, and these are carried out in ambient, wet solution or in a vacuum-chamber environment. Ion beams are superior in several important respects to traditional lapping, grinding, sanding, acid/base etching, etc. In particular, the vacuum environment of the ion-beam apparatus provides contamination control for the workpiece surface that can not be attained with any wet or atmospheric-based methods. The ion beam (dry) etches, i.e., sputters, away the surface, and if the surface is initially rough the etching may reduce the roughness.
As the surface reaches a smoothness near that of the atomic dimensions of the material, the ion-beam smoothing capability reaches its intrinsic limit, i.e., its asymptotic value. That limiting amount of roughness is due to the basic or intrinsic nature of both the surface and the ion interaction with that solid surface. Unfortunately, the limiting roughness for conventional ion-beam etching methods is not sufficiently smooth to make possible many of the applications requirements that have been widely projected to be necessary for future generations of microelectronics and photonics.
It has been recognized by specialists working with ion-beam processing of surfaces that beams composed of clusters of gas atoms, roughly 100 to 10,000 atoms in each cluster, can be singly ionized, accelerated and upon impact with a surface provide superior smoothness of many materials. This is the GCIB method of etching and smoothing. The efficiency of this method is limited partly by the ion dose required to accomplish reduction of roughness to within desired limits. Ion cluster beams may be composed of various gas species, each with a range of etching and smoothing capabilities. Noble gas ion beams (such as argon) interact with a surface by physical means (called sputter etching) while other gas types (e.g., oxygen) beams will interact both physically and chemically, i.e., reactively.
The chemical ion etch is generally a faster etch, but is highly specific to the composition of the particular surface being etched. Much less composition specific, the physical ion etch will generally have the lower residual roughness for all kinds of surfaces, i.e., leave a less rough surface after an arbitrarily long exposure (high dose). Larger clusters will provide the highest final surface finish but their formation in a GCIB apparatus is less efficient such that the highest beam currents may not be attained with the largest clusters.
Beams of higher energy, occurring as a consequence of the use of a higher accelerating potential, etch faster, but are expected to have a higher residual roughness for the same cluster size or size distribution. The greater residual roughness is due to (shallow) implantation and effects referred to as ion mixing, which cause the ion beam to etch material from (shallow) subsurface regions. Higher beam currents (flux of clusters upon the surface) will also etch faster but may result in higher residual roughness than would lower beam currents as a consequence of nonlinear effects in the surface etching physics and stochastic phenomenon.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides a method and apparatus for adapting the nature of an ion beam during processing of the surface of a solid work piece so as to improve the reduction of surface roughness (smoothing) by using a GCIB. In addition, the invention provides surface smoothing in combination with etching to predetermined depths and surface contamination removal. Advantages are minimum required processing time, minimum remaining roughness of the final surface, and reduction in the amount of material that must be removed in order to attain a desired level of smoothness.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4152478 (1979-05-01), Takagi
patent: 4522886 (1985-06-01), Chin et al.
patent: 4559096 (1985-12-01), Friedman et al.
patent: 4737637 (1988-04-01), Knauer
patent: 4740267 (1988-04-01), Knauer et al.
patent: 4762728 (1988-08-01), Keyser et al.
patent: 4799454 (1989-01-01), Ito
patent: 4833319 (1989-05-01), Knauer
patent: 4935623 (1990-06-01), Knauer
patent: 5019712 (1991-05-01), Knauer
patent: 5031408 (1991-07-01), Horne et al.
patent: 5110435 (1992-05-01), Haberland
patent: 5147823 (1992-09-01), Ishibashi et al.
patent: 5211994 (1993-05-01), Tsukazaki et al.
patent: 5264724 (1993-11-01), Brown et al.
patent: 5376223 (1994-12-01), Salimian et al.
patent: 5459326 (1995-10-01), Yamada
patent: 5561326 (1996-10-01), Ito et al.
patent: 5582879 (1996-12-01), Fujimura et al.
patent: 5657335 (1997-08-01), Rubin et al.
patent: 5731238 (1998-03-01), Cavins et al.
patent: 5754008 (1998-05-01), Wartski et al.
patent: 5796111 (1998-08-01), Mahoney
patent: 5814194 (1998-09-01), Deguchi et al.
patent: 5849093 (1998-12-01), Andrä
patent: 0 551 117 (1993-07-01), None
patent: 0 516 480 (1998-12-01), None
patent: 56074836 JP (1981-06-01), None
patent: 61-5440 (1986-01-01), None
patent: 61-210615 (1986-09-01), None
patent: 61268016 (1986-11-01), None
patent: 62100705 JP (1987-05-01), None
patent: 3-127321 (1991-05-01), None
patent: 4-8507 (1992-02-01), None
patent: 5-17309 (1993-03-01), None
patent: 06275545 JP (1994-09-01), None
patent: 08120470 JP (1996-05-01), None
patent: 08127867 JP (1996-05-01), None
patent: 08319105 JP (1996-12-01), None
Wesley Skinner, et al., “Clusters extend ion-beam technology”, Vacuum Solutions, Mar./Apr. 1999, pp. 29-32.
I. Yamada & J. Matsuo, “Cluster ion beam processing”, Materials Science In Semiconductor Processing 1, (1998) pp. 27-41, Ion Beam Engineering Experimental Laboratory, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-01, Japan.
J. Matsuo, et al., “Cluster ion assisted thin film formation”, Proceedings of the 14thInternational Conf. on application of Accelerators in Research and Industry. Denton, TX USA Nov. 6-9, 1996, AIP CP392, (1997) pp. 499-502.
I. Yamada et al., “Surface processing by gas cluster ion beams at the atomic (molecular) level”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14 (3), May/Jun. 1996, pp. 781-785.
N. Toyoda et al., “The sputtering effects for cluster ion beams”, Proceedings of the 14thIntl. Conf. on Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry. Denton, TX USA Nov. 6-9, 1996, AIP CP392, (1997) pp. 483-486.
“On the History of Cluster Beams” by E.W. Becker; Atom, Molecules and Clusters 3, pp. 101-107; 1986.
“Nucleation and Growth of Clusters In Expanding Nozzle Flows” by Otto. F. Hagena; Surface Science; pp. 101-116; 1981.
“Cluster Formation in Expanding Supersonic Jets: Effect of Pressure, Temperature, Nozzle Size and Test Gas” by Hagena et al.; The Journal of Chemical Physics; vol. 56, No. 5; Mar. 1, 1972.
“Oxidation of silicon with a 5 eV O-beam” by Hecht et al., American Institute of Physics; pp. 421-423.
“Effects of post-nitridation anneals on radiation hardness in rapid thermal nitrided gate oxides” by Lo et al., American Institute of Physics; Dec. 4, 1989; pp. 2405-2407.
“Surface Modification With Ionized Gas-Cluster Beams” by Marek Sosnowski; Advanced Materials; vol. 17, 1993.
“A method and apparatus for surface modification by gas-cluster ion impact” by Nothby et al.; Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research; 1993; pp. 336-340.
“Clusters of Atoms and Molecules” by H. Haberland; Springer-Verlag; 1994; pp. 207-252.
“Cluster-solid interaction experiments” by Brown et al.; Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research; Book 102; 1995; pp. 305-311.
“Sputtering effect of gas cluster ion beams” by Yamaguchi et al.; Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research; Book 99; 1995; pp. 237-239.
“SiO
Cohen Jerry
Epion Corporation
Lund Jeffrie R.
Perkins Smith & Cohen LLP
LandOfFree
Adaptive GCIB for smoothing surfaces does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Adaptive GCIB for smoothing surfaces, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Adaptive GCIB for smoothing surfaces will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2916549