Set of three level concurrent word line bias conditions for...

Semiconductor device manufacturing: process – Making field effect device having pair of active regions... – Having insulated gate

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C438S014000, C438S061000, C365S185040

Reexamination Certificate

active

06777292

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to semiconductor memories and in particular a three level concurrent word line bias condition for NOR type flash memory arrays.
2. Description of the Related Art
In today's flash EEPROM technology, a plurality of one-transistor EEPROM cells has been configured into either NAND-type or NOR-type memory arrays. For the NAND type cell array, the sources and drains of the flash cells are connected in series to save die size for the reason of cost reduction. In contrast, for NOR-type cell array, the drains and sources of the cells are connected in parallel to bit lines and source lines, respectively, to achieve high read speed at sacrifice of the increase in die size. It is well known that the NAND-type cell array suffers no over-erase problem due to its unique array structure allowing no leakage path during read. For a one transistor (non-split gate) NOR-type cell array, the over erase problem may or may not occur, and the over erase problem is subject to the choice of erase and program methods. Conventionally, a program operation is performed on the basis of bit-by-bit method but erase is performed collectively on all cells in a block. In both the NOR-type or NAND-type flash memory, the entire flash chip is divided into several blocks, and typically, the size of each flash block ranges from 64 Kbits to 512 Kbits. An erase operation is performed prior to program operation, and in a NAND-type flash memory, the erase is performed on a block (sector) basis and program is performed on a page basis.
A page is usually defined as a word line and a block is defined as many word lines which share common bit lines within the same divided block. Although several methods of erase and program operations have been proposed, in the current NAND type flash memory, the definition of erase and program operations is unified. The erase operation is to decrease the Vt (threshold voltage) of the cells that are physically connected to the same erased word line or the word lines in the same block. In contrast, the program operation is to increase the Vt of cells of selected erased word line or word lines in the selected block. The non-selected cells in the non-selected word lines in the selected block or the non-selected blocks remain undisturbed.
The following U.S. patents of prior art are directed toward the detailed description of NAND type flash EPROM's.
A) U.S. Pat. No. 6,038,170 (Shiba) is directed toward a nonvolatile memory of a hierarchical bit line structure having hierarchical bit lines which includes, a plurality of sub-bit lines.
B) U.S. Pat. No. 5,464,998 (Hayakawa et al.) is directed toward a non-volatile semiconductor memory device including NAND type memory cells arranged in a matrix pattern over a semiconductor substrate.
Up to the present, the definition of erase and program operations for a one-transistor cell, NOR-type flash memory is inconsistent. Erase could be defined to increase cell's Vt and program to decrease cell's Vt or vise versa depending on the preferred flash technology and its design techniques. The following is a summary of erase and program operations for state of the art one-transistor (non-split-gate) NOR-type flash EEPROM technologies.
I) FN (Fowler-Nordheim) Block erase, CHE (channel hot electron) program, one-transistor cell, NOR-type flash ,EEPROM technology. The typical example is an ETOX flash cell. In this prior art, programming is performed on bit-by-bit basis to increase the Vt of the cells by using the CHE method while erase is performed on block basis to decrease the Vt of the cells by using FN-tunneling method. The CHE program consumes more than 300 uA per bit, therefore only a few bits can be programmed at a time by an on-chip charge pump having an economic semiconductor area. Unlike CHE, FN-tunneling erase requires only 10 nA per flash cell so that a big block size of 512 Kb can be erased simultaneously. For a Vdd voltage of 3V or lower, about 4 bits of ETOX cells are programmed in state-of-the art design. In a CHE operation, hot electrons are injected into cell's floating gate with an increase in Vt. In contrast, in the FN tunneling operation, the electrons are extracted out of the floating gate with a decrease in Vt . The erase operation is called an edge erase operation which is done at edge of the thin tunnel oxide between the floating gate and the source junction. In the ETOX flash cell, the source junction of N+ is used for an erase operation only which is made to be much deeper than the drain node. The source junction of N+ is surrounded with lightly doped N-implant to reduce the peak electrical field generated during erase operation at the tunneling edge. The drain junction is formed with a shallow N+, with a P+ implanted underneath to enhance the electrical field for CHE program. The ETOX cell is made non-symmetrical with respect to source and drain junctions of the cell in terms of cell structure and operating conditions; therefore it is very difficult to shrink the cell using technology below 0.18 um for Ultra-high integrated memory.
The key operating conditions for the ETOX technology with a cell made on a P-substrate are as follows:
Source
Gate
Drain
Bulk
a) Erase (edge)
+5 V
−10 V
Floating
OV
b) Program (channel)
OV
+10 V
+5 V
OV
c) Read
OV
Vdd + &dgr;V
  1 V
OV
Erase
Program
d) Current per cell
10 nA
>300 uA
The drawbacks of the ETOX flash cell are: a) a low cell scalability resulting from an asymmetrical cell structure with a deep source junction; b) a high program current caused by the CHE program scheme; c) a high erase current resulting from using an edge-FN scheme with large substrate leakage current; d) severe over erase potential caused by decreasing the Vt of cells during erase operation; e) a channel punch through problem in short channel lengths due to the edge erase.
The following U.S. patents of prior art are directed toward the detailed description of ETOX flash cell operations:
A) U.S. Pat. No. 5,712,815 (Colin et al.) is directed toward an improved programming structure for performing a program operation in an array of multiple bits-per-cell flash EEPROM memory cells is provided.
B) U.S. Pat. No. 5,790,456 (Haddad) is directed toward an improved method for performing channel hot-carrier programming in an array of multiple bits-per-cell Flash EEPROM memory cells in a NOR memory architecture so as to eliminate program disturb during a programming operation.
C) U.S. Pat. No. 6,011,715 (Pasotti et al.) is directed toward a programming method for a nonvolatile memory which includes several steps that are repeated until a final threshold value is obtained.
D) U.S. Pat. No. 5,825,689 (Wakita) is directed toward a nonvolatile semiconductor memory device including a memory cell array in which the threshold voltage of a transistor constituting the memory cell is at ground potential or less, and the source voltage condition is changed by a source potential setting circuit in accordance with a detection result from a data detecting circuit.
II) AND one-transistor cell, NOR-type flash EEPROM technology. Unlike ETOX technology, in the AND one transistor prior art the program is performed on bit-by-bit basis to decrease the Vt of cells while erase is performed on block basis to increase the Vt of cells. Both erase and program operations use the FN-tunneling method which consumes only about 10 nA per bit; therefore, a large number of flash cells within a large block can be erased simultaneously by an on-chip charge pump which utilizes a small area on the chip. For a single low power supply, Vdd, is at 3V or below, and as many as 16 Kb of cells of the AND technology in a block can be erased. In the AND prior art, the erase operation is carried out by FN block channel erase, and the program operation is carried out by page FN edge program. The edge program is at the drain edge formed by a buried N+ bit line. The electrons are injected into cell's floating gate b

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Set of three level concurrent word line bias conditions for... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Set of three level concurrent word line bias conditions for..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Set of three level concurrent word line bias conditions for... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3305529

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.