Method of operation of punch-through field effect transistor

Semiconductor device manufacturing: process – Making field effect device having pair of active regions... – Having insulated gate

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C438S270000, C438S138000, C438S589000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06444527

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to semiconductor devices and more particular to a trenched field effect transistor especially suitable for low voltage switching applications.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Field effect transistors (FETs) are well known, as are metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs); such transistors are often used for power applications. There is a need for power transistors for relatively low voltage applications, i.e. typically under 50 volts, that have low current leakage blocking capability.
Examples of trench field effect transistors suitable for such applications are disclosed in “Comparison of Ultra Low Specific On Resistance UMOSFET Structures . . . ” by Syau et al.,
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
, Vol. 41, No. 5, May 1994. Inter alia, this publication describes the so-called INVFET structure of present
FIG. 1
, which corresponds to FIG.
1
(
b
) of the publication. Present
FIG. 1
shows only a portion of a single transistor including the polysilicon (polycrystalline silicon) gate electrode
10
which in this case is N-type polysilicon which is insulated by a gate oxide layer
12
on its sides and bottom in a trench
14
and insulated on its top side by an oxide layer
18
. The trench
14
extends through the N+ doped source region
22
through the P doped base region
24
and into the N+ doped drain region
26
. The drain electrode
30
is formed on the underside of the drain region
26
and the source electrode
32
formed on the top side of the source region.
Also described in FIG.
1
(
c
) of this article and shown here in present
FIG. 2
is the somewhat similar so-called EXTFET which is identical to the INVFET except for having an additional N− doped drift region
36
formed underlying the P doped base region
24
. For both of these devices the P base region
24
is formed by diffusion (hence does not exhibit uniform doping) and is fairly heavily doped. It is believed that a typical surface concentration of the P base region
24
is 10
17
/cm
3
.
These devices are both intended to avoid full depletion of the P base (body) region
24
. They each have the gate electrode
10
doped to the same conductivity type as is the drain region
26
(i.e. N type) as shown in
FIGS. 1 and 2
. The “mesa” width, i.e. the width of the source region between two adjacent trenches, is typically 3 &mgr;m and a typical cell pitch for an N-channel device is about 6 &mgr;m. Blocking is accomplished by a quasi-neutral (undepleted) PN junction at a V
gs
(gate source voltage) of zero. The ACCUFET (see Syau et al. article) offers the best specific on resistance at the expense of poor blocking capability, while the INVFET and EXTFET offer improved blocking at the expense of increased specific on resistance.
As is well known, a power MOSFET should have the lowest possible on-state specific resistance in order to minimize conduction losses. On-state resistance is a well known parameter of the efficiency of a power transistor and is the ratio of drain-to-source voltage to drain current when the device is fully turned on. On-state specific resistance refers to resistance times cross sectional area of the substrate carrying the drain current.
However, these prior art devices do not provide the optimum low on-state specific resistance in combination with blocking state low current leakage.
SUMMARY
This disclosure is directed to a MOS semiconductor device suitable especially for low voltage power application where low leakage blocking capability is desirable. In accordance with the invention, the off-state blocking of a trenched field effect transistor is achieved by a gate controlled barrier region between the source and drain. Similar to the above described INVFET, forward conduction occurs through an inversion region between the source and the drain (substrate). Unlike the INVFET, however, blocking is achieved by a gate controlled depletion barrier and not by a quasi-neutral PN junction. The depletion barrier is formed and controlled laterally and vertically so as to realize the benefits of ultra-low on-state specific resistance combined with the low current leakage blocking. Advantageously, this structure is relatively easily fabricated and has blocking superior to that of prior art ACCUFET devices, with low leakage current at zero applied gate-source voltage. Moreover, in the blocking state there is no quasi-neutral PN junction, and therefore, like the ACCUFET, this structure offers the advantage of containing no parasitic bipolar PN junction.
The present device's on-state specific resistance is comparable to that of the ACCUFET, and like the ACCUFET offers on-state specific resistance superior to that of the INVFET and EXTFET as described in the above mentioned article by Syau et al.
In an N-channel embodiment of the present invention, an N+ drain region underlies a lightly doped P− body region which is overlain by an N+ source region. The body region is formed by lightly doped epitaxy with uniform or almost uniform doping concentration, typically in a range of 10
14
to 10
16
/cm
3
. The gate electrodes are formed in trenches which extend through the source region, through the body region, and partially into the drain (substrate) region. Alternatively, the gate electrodes do not extend into the drain region. The polysilicon gate electrodes themselves are P doped, i.e. having a doping type the same as that of the body region. Additionally, the mesas (holding the source regions) located between adjacent gate electrode trenches are less than 1.5 &mgr;m wide, and the cell pitch is less than 3 &mgr;m.
Advantageously in the blocking state the epitaxial P body region is depleted due to the applied drain-source bias V
ds
, and hence a punch-through type condition occurs vertically. However, lateral gate control combined with the narrow mesa width (under 1.5 &mgr;m) increases the effective depletion barrier to majority carrier flow and prevents conduction. Thus, the present device is referred to herein as the PT-FET for “punch-through field effect transistor”.
Thus the blocking characteristics are determined by barrier-limited majority-carrier current flow and not by avalanche breakdown. In accordance with the invention, a complementary P-channel device is implemented and has advantages comparable to those of the above described N-channel device.
The above described embodiment has a floating body region, thus allowing bidirectional operation. In another embodiment a body contact region is provided extending into the body region from the principal surface of the semiconductor structure, thus allowing a source region to body region short via the source metallization for forward blocking-only applications.
Thus advantageously the present PT-FET has a fully depleted (punch-through) lightly doped body region at a small applied drain-source voltage. This differs from the P body region in the above described INVFET and EXTFET which must, by design, be undepleted to avoid punch-through. Advantageously, the threshold voltage is low due to the lightly doped P body region and the device has an on-state specific resistance similar to that of the ACCUFET and superior to that of the INVFET or EXTFET.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4633292 (1986-12-01), Fellinger et al.
patent: 4941026 (1990-07-01), Temple
patent: 5023196 (1991-06-01), Johnsen et al.
patent: 5072276 (1991-12-01), Malhi et al.
patent: 5082795 (1992-01-01), Temple
patent: 5233215 (1993-08-01), Baliga
patent: 5298442 (1994-03-01), Bulucea et al.
patent: 5316959 (1994-05-01), Kwan et al.
patent: 5326711 (1994-07-01), Malhi
patent: 5349224 (1994-09-01), Gilbert et al.
patent: 5378911 (1995-01-01), Murakami
patent: 5405794 (1995-04-01), Kim
patent: 5430315 (1995-07-01), Rumennik
patent: 5468982 (1995-11-01), Hshieh et al.
patent: 6-252408 (1994-09-01), None
Patent Abstracts of Japan—Publication No. 06-252408,published Sep. 9, 1994, *abstract and figure*.
Patent Abstracts of Japan—vol. 017, No. 050 (E-1314), Jan. 29, 1993 and JP 04

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method of operation of punch-through field effect transistor does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method of operation of punch-through field effect transistor, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method of operation of punch-through field effect transistor will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2832028

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.