Wafer area pressure control for plasma confinement

Details Wafer area pressure control for plasma confinement Wafer area pressure control for plasma confinement

2002-08-21

2004-11-30

Lee, Wilson (Department: 2821)

Coating apparatus

Gas or vapor deposition

With treating means

C315S111210

Reexamination Certificate

active

06823815

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the processing equipment for the fabrication of semiconductor-based devices. More particularly, the present invention relates to improved techniques for confining and controlling the pressure of the plasma in plasma processing chambers.
In the fabrication of semiconductor-based devices (e.g., integrated circuits or flat panel displays) layers of material may alternately be deposited onto and etched from a substrate surface (e.g., the semiconductor wafer or glass panel). As is well known in the art, the etching of the deposited layer(s) may be accomplished by a variety of techniques including plasma-enhanced etching. In plasma-enhanced etching, the etching of the deposited layer(s) on the substrate takes place inside a plasma processing chamber. During etching, a plasma is formed from a suitable etchant gas source to etch areas of the deposited layer(s) on the substrate that are unprotected by the mask, leaving behind the desired pattern.
Among different types of plasma etching systems, those utilizing methods to confine the plasma to a volume immediately above the substrate have proven highly suitable for efficient production and/or for forming the ever-shrinking features on the substrate. An example of such a system may be found in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 5,534,751, which is incorporated by reference herein. Although plasma confinement results in a significant improvement in the performance of plasma processing systems, current implementations can be improved. In particular, it is realized that improvements can be made in the control of the pressure of the confined plasma and the accessibility of the plasma processing volume for substrate transport.
To facilitate discussion,
FIG. 1A
depicts an exemplary plasma processing chamber
100
, including confinement rings
102
as they are currently implemented. Within plasma processing chamber
100
, the substrate
106
is positioned upon the lower electrode
104
. The lower electrode
104
incorporates a suitable substrate chucking mechanism (e.g., electrostatic, mechanical clamping, or the like) for holding the substrate
106
. The reactor top
110
incorporates an upper electrode
112
disposed immediately opposite the lower electrode
104
. The upper electrode
112
, lower electrode
104
, and confinement rings
102
define the confined plasma volume
116
. Gas is supplied to the confined plasma volume
116
by etchant gas source
114
and is exhausted from the confined plasma volume
116
through the confinement rings
102
and exhaust port
120
by a vacuum pump. With gas flowing and an appropriate pressure established within the confined plasma volume, a plasma is formed within this volume by application of RF power to the lower electrode by RF source
108
while grounding upper electrode
112
. Alternately, as is well known in the art, the plasma may be formed by applying RF power to both lower electrode
104
and upper electrode
112
, or by grounding lower electrode
104
and applying RF power to upper electrode
112
.
The confinement rings
102
serve both to confine the plasma to the volume
106
and to control the pressure of the plasma. The confinement of the plasma to the volume
116
is a function of many factors including the spacing between the confinement rings
102
, the pressure in the volume outside the confinement rings and in the plasma, the type and flow rate of the gas, as well as the level and frequency of RF power. For effective plasma confinement, the pressure outside the confinement rings
102
should be as low as possible, preferably less than 30 millitorr. Confinement of the plasma is more easily accomplished if the spacing between the confinement rings
102
is very small. Typically, a spacing of 0.15 inches or less is required for confinement. However, the spacing of the confinement rings also determines the pressure of the plasma, and it is desirable that the spacing can be adjusted to achieve the pressure required for optimal process performance while maintaining plasma.
Commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,060 entitled “Cam-Based Arrangement for Positioning Confinement Rings In A Plasma Processing Chamber” by Eric H. Lenz, issued Feb. 1, 2000, incorporated by reference, taught that the pressure drop across the confinement rings is approximately proportional to the expression 1/(X
2
+Y
2
+Z
2
) where X, Y and Z are the distances between confinement rings as shown in FIG.
1
B. Lenz provided a single movable ring and a stationary ring (X=constant, Y+Z=constant in FIG.
1
B). By adjusting the distances Y and Z by moving the single movable confinement ring, as taught by Lenz, a plasma pressure control range can be obtained.
FIG. 2
illustrates the relative pressure predicted by the expression above obtained by moving a single ring for of various fixed gaps, X. The expression predicts a. control range of 67-100% can be obtained, as illustrated in
FIG. 2
, while experiments found the achievable range to be approximately one half those values. In many cases, a wider plasma pressure range is required to achieve optimal process results on various types of films and devices within the same processing system.
In addition, in the method taught by Lenz, the confinement rings
102
are constrained between the upper and lower electrode assemblies and thus can restrict access to the interelectrode space for loading and unloading of substrates. As shown in
FIG. 1C
, even with the confinement rings
102
lifted to their uppermost position, the access to the interelectrode space is limited to the gap W, which is the difference of the total interelectrode space less the combined thicknesses of the confinement rings.
It is desirable to provide an increased range of pressure control while maintaining plasma confinement. It is also desirable to provide confinement rings that greater facilitate placement and removal of the substrate from the plasma processing system.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
To achieve the foregoing and other objects and in accordance with the purpose of the present invention, a plasma processing device is provided. A vacuum chamber with an exhaust port and vacuum pump in fluid connection with the vacuum chamber and a gas source in fluid connection with the vacuum chamber is provided. Within the vacuum chamber a wafer area pressure control device for providing wafer area pressure control range greater than 500% is placed.
In addition, the present invention provides a method of controlling wafer area pressure. Generally, a substrate is placed in a vacuum chamber. A gas source is provided to the vacuum chamber. Gas is also exhausted from the vacuum chamber. At least one ring is moved to provide wafer area pressure control range greater than 500%.
These and other features of the present invention will be described in more detail below in the detailed description of the invention and in conjunction with the following figures.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5246532 (1993-09-01), Ishida
patent: 5534751 (1996-07-01), Lenz et al.
patent: 5660673 (1997-08-01), Miyoshi
patent: 5998932 (1999-12-01), Lenz
patent: 6008130 (1999-12-01), Henderson et al.
patent: 6019060 (2000-02-01), Lenz
patent: 6068784 (2000-05-01), Collins et al.
patent: 6261408 (2001-07-01), Schneider et al.
patent: 6354241 (2002-03-01), Tanaka et al.
patent: 6433484 (2002-08-01), Hao et al.
patent: 2000058512 (2000-02-01), None
patent: 90124573 (1997-05-01), None
patent: 01/50498 (2001-07-01), None
International Search Report, Date of Mailing: Feb. 25, 2002.
International Search Report, Date of Mailing: May 24, 2002.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Wafer area pressure control for plasma confinement does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Wafer area pressure control for plasma confinement, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Wafer area pressure control for plasma confinement will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3314629