Error detection/correction and fault detection/recovery – Data processing system error or fault handling – Reliability and availability
Reexamination Certificate
1998-10-09
2001-07-24
Myers, Paul R. (Department: 2181)
Error detection/correction and fault detection/recovery
Data processing system error or fault handling
Reliability and availability
C714S738000, C702S120000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06266787
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to circuit board testing. More particularly, this invention relates to the identification of manufacturing defects and faulty components on a circuit board.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Generally, a circuit board consists of numerous interconnected components such as semiconductor chips, resistors, capacitors, inductors, etc. After circuit boards have been assembled, but before they can be used or placed into assembled products, they must be tested. Testing verifies that the proper components have been used, that each component performs within test limits, that all required electrical connections have been properly completed, and that all necessary electrical components have been attached to the board in the proper position and with the proper orientation. When a component is not performing within test limits, it is said to be faulty.
A common way to test assembled printed circuit boards is called in-circuit test. In-circuit testing involves probing individual board components through a so-called “bed-of-nails” and verifying their existence and specifications independent of surrounding circuitry. A well known series of circuit board testing machines for in-circuit testing is the Hewlett-Packard Company Model HP-3070 Family of Circuit Board Testers. The BP-3070 Family of board testers are fully described in the HP-3070 Family Operating and Service Manuals available from Hewlett-Packard Company. Other families of circuit board testing machines made by Hewlett-Packard are the HP-3060 and HP-3065 series.
To test each individual board component, in-circuit testing requires access to every node on the circuit board. With through-hole parts, access is directly available at component leads. With surface mount parts, access is provided through vias and test pads that are placed on the circuit board when it is designed. Increases in board density, however, have led to a decrease in the size of vias that has eclipsed the ability of probe technology to contact a smaller target. Vias now are often one hundred times smaller in area than vias used just a few years ago. Furthermore, test pads that are large enough to be probed successfully require a substantial amount of board area that would otherwise be used to place and connect components. Therefore, on many circuit boards it is no longer practical, or desirable, to probe every node on the board.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a test technique and apparatus that can test individual circuit board components having tolerances without requiring access to every node on the circuit board. Such a technique should be generalized so that it can be used with many different circuits and tolerance ranges. Furthermore, it is desirable that such a system be implemented on existing in-circuit testing hardware to preserve existing capital and process investments in that hardware.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In a preferred embodiment, the invention selects stimulus locations in a group of components with inaccessible nodes. The invention provides the ability to choose stimulus locations that maximize test throughput, maximize branch voltages, or trade-off these two goals. The invention is generally applicable to all kinds of circuits and may be implemented using existing computer and tester hardware.
The invention calculates a set of branch voltages for each possible stimulus location on a circuit with inaccessible nodes. The branch voltages are then sorted and assigned a rank order number. These rank orders are then associated with the circuit branches for each stimulus. The rank order numbers of the branch voltages for a each stimulus location are used to calculate a figure of merit for that stimulus location. These figures of merit, and the rank orders of the circuit branches for that stimulus location are then used to choose stimulus locations according to a desired goal. Goals that may be set are to maximize branch voltages, maximize test throughput, or some tradeoff between these two goals.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the invention.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4204633 (1980-05-01), Goel
patent: 5012180 (1991-04-01), Dalymple et al.
patent: 5172378 (1992-12-01), Sugioka et al.
patent: 5732209 (1998-03-01), Vigil et al.
patent: 5734661 (1998-03-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 5808919 (1998-09-01), Preist et al.
Jri Vlach and Kishore Singhal, “Computer Methods For Circuit Analysis and Design,” Van Nostrand Reinhold Publishing, New York, NY, 1983, Chapter 4, “General Formulation Methods,” pp. 100-151, Chapter 5, “Sensitivities.” pp. 152-170.
Leon O. Chua and Pen-Min Lin, “Computer-Aided Analysis of Electronic Circuits: Algorithms and Computational Techniques”, Prentice-Hall, 1975, Chapter 4, “Nodal Linear Network Analysis: Algorithms and Computational Methods,” pp. 166-203, Chapter 17, Advanced Algorithms and Computational Techniques for Computer Simulation Programs, pp. 665-717.
Yoshio Togawa, Takashi Matsumoto, & Hideki Arai, “The Tf-Equivalence Class Approach to Analog Fault Diagnosis Problems”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. CAS-33, No. 10, Oct. 1986, pp. 992-1009.
Jiri Vlach and Kishore Singhal, Computer Methods for Circuit Analysis and Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold Publishing, New York, NY, 1983.
Leon O. Chau & Pen-Min Lin, Computer Aided Analysis of Electronic Circuits: Algorithms and Computational Techniques, Prentis Hall, 1975.
Gary D. Hactel, Robert K. Brayton, and Fred G. Gustavson, “The Sparse Tableu Approach to Network Analysis and Design” IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory, vol. CT-18, No. 1, Jan. 1971, pp. 101-113.
Kenneth P. Parker, John e. McDermid and Stig Oresjo “Structure and Metrology for an Analog Testability Bus” Proceeding of the IEEE International Test Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, Oct. 1993, pp. 309-322.
Juin-Lang Huang & Kwang-Ting Cheng “Analog Fault Diagnosis for Unpowered Circuit Boards” Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference, Washington, DC, Nov. 1997, pp. 640-648.
John McDermid “Limited Access Testing: IEEE 1149.4 Instrumentation & Method”, Proceeding of the IEEE International Test Conference, Oct. 1998, pp. 388-395.
John McDermid, “Limited Access Testing: Ability and Requirements” Proceedings of the Technical Program. NEPCON West '98, Mar. 1998, vol. 2, pp. 736-742.
R. Lui, Testing and Diagnosis of Analog Circuits and Systems, Van Nostrand & Reinhold, NY, 1991.
S.D. Bedrosian, “On Element Value Solution of Single-Element-Kind Networks”, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Dec. 1961.
Timothy N. Trick, Wataru Mayeda, and Adel A. Sakla, “Calculation of Parameter Values from Node Voltage Measurements”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. CAS-26, No. 7, pp. 466-474, Jul. 1979.
Zheng F. Huang, Chen-Shang Lin & Ruey-Wen Liu, “Node-Fault Diagnosis and a Design of Testability”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. CAS-30, No. 5, pp. 257-265, May 1983.
R.M. Biernacki and J.W. Bandler, “Fault Location of Analog Circuits”, Proceedings of the 1980 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits & Systems, NY, 1980, pp. 1078-1081.
R. S. Berkowitz, “Conditions for Networks-Element-Value Solvability”, IRE Transactions on Circuit Theory, Mar. 1962, pp. 24-29.
L. Rapisarda & R.A. Decarlo, “Analog Multifrequency Fault Diagnosis”, IEEE Transactions of Circuits & Systems, vol. CAS-30, No. 4, pp. 223-234, Apr. 1983.
Kwang-Ting (Tim) Cheng, “Test Point Selections for Analog Fault Diagnosis”, Proposal Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of California—Santa Barbarba to Hewlett-Packard Company, 1996.
Ahrikencheikh Cherif
Browen Rodney A.
Darbie William P.
Lannen Kay C.
McDermid John E.
Agilent Technologie,s Inc.
Myers Paul R.
Neudeck Alexander
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for selecting stimulus locations during... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for selecting stimulus locations during..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for selecting stimulus locations during... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2438928