Coating apparatus – Gas or vapor deposition – Crucible or evaporator structure
Reexamination Certificate
1999-05-14
2001-01-30
Lund, Jeffrie R. (Department: 1763)
Coating apparatus
Gas or vapor deposition
Crucible or evaporator structure
C219S394000, C118S715000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06179925
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed toward the field of manufacturing integrated circuits. The invention is more particularly directed toward an improved method and apparatus for introducing process and purge material in a deposition process system.
2. Description of the Related Art
Presently, aluminum is widely employed in integrated circuits as an interconnect, such as plugs and vias. However, higher device densities, faster operating frequencies, and larger die sizes have created a need for a metal with lower resistivity than aluminum to be used in interconnect structures. The lower resistivity of copper makes it an attractive candidate for replacing aluminum.
There are a few well established techniques for depositing copper including, chemical vapor deposition (“CVD”), physical vapor deposition (“PVD”) and electrodeposition. In one known method, chemical vapor deposition of copper is achieved by using a precursor material known as Cupraselect®, which has the formula Cu(hfac)L. Cupraselect® is a registered trademark of Schumacher of Carlsbad, Calif. The Cupraselect® consists of copper (Cu) bonded to a deposition controlling compound such as (hfac) and a thermal stabilizing compound (L). The (hfac) represents hexafluoroacetylacetonato, and (L) represents a ligand base compound, such as trimethylvinylsilane (“TMVS”). This precursor material is vaporized and flowed into a deposition chamber containing a wafer. In the chamber, the vaporized precursor material is heated at the wafer's surface. At the desired temperature the following reaction results:
2 Cu(
hfac
)
L
→Cu+Cu(
hfac
)2+2
L
(Eqn. 1)
The resulting copper (Cu) deposits on the surface of the wafer. The byproducts of the reaction (i.e., Cu(hfac)
2
and (2L) are purged from the chamber which is maintained at a vacuum during wafer processing.
In some instances, a Cupraselect® blend is used as the precursor material. The Cupraselect® blend is Cu(hfac)L with extra (hfac) blended with the Cu(hfac)L for additional stability. One problem associated with using blended Cupraselect® for CVD is the delivery of the material from its liquid storage ampoule to the process chamber in which the CVD occurs. Typically, the liquid Cupraselect® (or blend) is stored in bulk and is passed to the process chamber via a direct liquid injection (DLI) system. The DLI system vaporizes the precursor material in close proximity to the wafer. Such a system is seen and described in commonly assigned patent application entitled, “Method and Apparatus for Improved Control of Process and Purge Material in a Substrate Processing System” by Schmitt, et al. filed Jul. 21, 1998. After vaporization, the Cupraselect® is pumped into the process chamber via a carrier gas such as Argon, Helium or other inert gases. This pumping action tends to pull a high concentration of TMVS out of the Cupraselect® blend leaving the less stable copper and hfac. Under these conditions, deposition is likely to occur at undesirable locations. For example, deposition can occur near the vaporizer, valves, process chamber showerhead, and the like. Deposition changes the dimensions of these critical system components which degrades performance of the chamber and the resultant deposition layer on the wafer. Additionally, unwanted deposition may flake off during the deposition process which can render a processed wafer faulty or unusable. A maintenance cycle would then have to be run on the process chamber to replace or clean the chamber which reduces system productivity.
Similar difficulties exist at other times within the CVD system. For example, when a precursor material ampoule is nearly empty and is to be replaced, the transfer lines between the ampoule and the process chamber must be pumped out. Similar to the process pumping, transfer line purge pumping pulls greater concentrations of TMVS out of the residual Cupraselect® blend remaining in the transfer lines leaving the less stable Cu and (hfac) which can cause particles (deposition) to form in the transfer lines or in the valve that accepts the ampoule. When a new ampoule (under pressure) is installed, the flow of high pressure liquid Cupraselect® can easily dislodge particles formed in the lines and valves and carry such particles down to other delivery equipment or the process chamber.
Additionally, during the deposition process, edge purge gas is provided at the wafer to keep copper from depositing on the edge (exclusion zone) and backside of the wafer. The edge purge gas (typically an inert gas such as Argon) diffuses around the edge of the wafer to redirect the flow of any process gases such as vaporized Cupraselect® away from edge of the wafer. Typically, the wafer is a silicon or silicon dioxide based substrate. In such substrates, copper can easily diffuse into the wafer thereby introducing additional conductive particles. Such contamination can short devices (i.e., gate structures) being fabricated on the wafer. The physical interaction of the purge gas on the process gas that reduces deposition at the exclusion zone and wafer backside. Additionally, metal etching of copper is not easily accomplished; other processes such as Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) are used instead. Unfortunately, CMP can also create particles at the edge of the wafer that can be transferred to subsequent chambers.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide an apparatus and method for improved control and handling of precursor material and purge additives in a substrate process system to reduce the likelihood of deposition or particle formation within the system as well as enhance the edge purge gas capabilities.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The disadvantages associated with the prior art are overcome with the present invention of an apparatus for control of precursor material and purge additive in a deposition process system comprising a vapor-phase purge additive delivery system connected to the deposition process system. Further, a plurality of purge additive transfer lines communicate between the deposition process system and the purge additive delivery system. The purge additive is a gas phase or vapor of the stabilizer liquid (TMVS) The precursor material delivery system further comprises an ampoule, a liquid mass flow controller connected to the ampoule and a vaporizer connected to the liquid mass flow controller. One of the plurality of purge additive transfer lines is connected between the ampoule and the liquid mass flow controller, another is connected between the liquid mass flow controller and the vaporizer and a third is connected to the vaporizer. The apparatus further comprises a process chamber connected to the precursor material delivery system and having a susceptor wherein one of the plurality of purge additive transfer lines is connected to the susceptor.
Additionally, a method for controlling contaminant particle production in a deposition system comprises heating a substrate upon a susceptor in the deposition chamber, introducing a precursor and carrier materials from a precursor material delivery system to begin CVD, introducing purge additive to the chamber and introducing a purge additive to the precursor material delivery system to reduce deposition therein. The step of introducing a purge additive to the chamber further comprises providing a purge additive to an edge of the wafer and the step of providing purge additive to the deposition system further comprises the step of introducing a purge additive to a vaporizer and a connection between the liquid mass flow controller and vaporizer.
With the apparatus and accompanying method, formation of particulate contaminants is greatly reduced. The purge additive provided at strategic locations within the deposition system provides a stabilizing effect to any precursor material that remains in the transfer lines. The presence of the excess (L) greatly reduces the reaction that produces solid Cu. As such, the precursor material is less likely to break down and form particles (e.g., copper
Chang Mei
Schmitt John
Voss Stephen
Zheng Bo
Applied Materials Inc.
Lund Jeffrie R.
MacArthur Sylvia R
Thomason Moser & Patterson
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for improved control of process and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for improved control of process and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for improved control of process and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2537203