Integrated microcolumn and scanning probe microscope arrays

Radiant energy – Inspection of solids or liquids by charged particles

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C250S310000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06369385

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to electron beam technology. More particularly, the present invention relates to an apparatus including a microcolumn and a scanning probe microscope for surface inspection and microfabrication.
2. Description of the Related Art
The recent trend in electron beam technology is toward low voltage scanning electron microscopy. Low voltage scanning electron microscopy has applications in surface inspection, metrology, testing and lithography.
Conventional scanning electron microscopes (SEMs) are large immobile devices. Although SEMs have many applications, such as semiconductor-related inspection and testing, conventional SEMs are limited in their usefulness because of their size, immobility and associated costs. For instance, because the sample being observed, as opposed to the SEM, must be moved during the inspection process, a conventional SEM requires the use of a vacuum chamber that is much larger than the sample. Further, the sample must be positioned at an angle relative to a conventional SEM to produce a beam incidence angle required for three-dimensional-like surface feature imaging. This makes handling of large or delicate samples difficult. Moreover, throughput of a conventional SEM is limited because only one microscope can observe a sample at a time.
An effort to improve SEMs has resulted in miniature electron beam microcolumns (“microcolumns”). Microcolumns are based on microfabricated electron optical components and field emission sources operating under the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) feedback principle. Microcolumns are discussed in general in T. H. P. Chang et al., “Electron Beam Technology—SEM to Microcolumn,” 32
Microelectronic Engineerng
113-30 (1996) and T. H. P. Chang et al., “Electron-Beam Microcolumns for Lithography and Related Applications,” B 14(6)
Journal of Vacuum Science Technology
3774-81 (November/December 1996), which are incorporated herein by reference.
Although microcolumns provide high resolution at a high scanning speeds, they are unable to provide atomic resolution. Information at the atomic level, such as spectroscopy or topography, may be necessary for in-line quality control or registration in microfabrication. In addition, for lithography, microcolumns are limited in their ability to write very small features. Thus, it would be advantageous to provide an apparatus having a wider range of resolution than that of a microcolumn and capable of writing atomic-scale features.
SUMMARY
The present invention addresses these problems by combining a microcolumn and a scanning probe microscope in a single apparatus. The apparatus provides a greater range of resolution and scan area size than either the microcolumn or scanning probe microscope alone. In addition, the small size of the apparatus makes it suitable for use in confined spaces. This versatile apparatus has applications in the areas of imaging, lithography and spectroscopy.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, an apparatus for surface inspection or microfabrication of a wafer includes a microcolumn and an associated scanning probe microscope. Both may be mounted on a single support structure. The scanning probe microscope, which, for example, can be a scanning tunneling microscope or an atomic force microscope, provides atomic resolution of features on the wafer, while the microcolumn allows coarse rapid scanning of the overall sample.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, an apparatus for surface inspection or microfabrication of a wafer includes an array of microcolumns and at least one scanning probe microscope. The at least one scanning probe microscope is associated with at least one microcolumn in the array of microcolumns to provide atomic resolution of features on the wafer.
In accordance with still another aspect of the present invention, a method for inspecting or patterning a wafer includes providing an array that includes multiple microcolumns and at least one scanning probe microscope and placing the array above the wafer such that each microcolumn of the array of microcolumns is situated above a respective die of the wafer. The method further includes inspecting or patterning the dice of the wafer or selectively exposing patterns on the dice with the microcolumns. The scanning probe microscope precisely positions the array above the wafer and/or patterns and inspects atomic-scale features on the dice. The simultaneous operation provides a fast inspection or lithography process.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4874945 (1989-10-01), Ohi
patent: 5015850 (1991-05-01), Zdeblick et al.
patent: 5081353 (1992-01-01), Yamada et al.
patent: 5126574 (1992-06-01), Gallagher
patent: 5155359 (1992-10-01), Monahan
patent: 5227626 (1993-07-01), Okada et al.
patent: 5229607 (1993-07-01), Matsui et al.
patent: 5231286 (1993-07-01), Kajimura et al.
patent: 5333495 (1994-08-01), Yamaguchi et al.
patent: 5345815 (1994-09-01), Albrecht et al.
patent: 5510615 (1996-04-01), Ho et al.
patent: 5581082 (1996-12-01), Hansma et al.
patent: 5618760 (1997-04-01), Soh et al.
patent: 5689063 (1997-11-01), Fujiu et al.
patent: 0531779 (1993-03-01), None
E. S. Snow and P. M. Campbell, “Fabrication of Si nanostructures with an atomic force microscope,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 64, No. 15, Apr. 11, 1994, pp. 1932-1934.
E.S. Snow, P.M. Campbell, and P. J. McMarr, “Fabrication of silicon nanostructures with a scanning tunneling microscope,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 63 (6), Aug. 9, 1993, pp. 749-751.
Christie R. K. Marrian, Elizabeth A. Dobisz and John A. Dagata, “Low Voltage E-Beam Lithography With The STM,” Technology of Proximal Probe Lithography, pp. 58-73.
Dawen Wang, Liming Tsau and K.L. Wang, “Nanometer-structure writing on Si(100) surfaces using a non-contact-mode automic force microscope,” Appl. Phys. Lett 65 (11), Sep. 12, 1994, pp. 1415-1417.
H. J. Mamin and D. Rugar, “Thermomechanical writing with an atomic force microscope tip,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 (8), Aug. 24, 1992, pp. 1003-1005.
A. Majumdar, P. I. Oden, J. P. Carrejo, L. A. Nagahara, J. J. Graham and J. Alexander, “Nanometer-scale lithography using the atomic force microscope,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 (19), Nov. 9, 1992, pp. 2293-2295.
Chang et al., “Electron Beam technology—SEM to microcolumn,” Sep. 1996, Microelectronic Engineering vol. 32, No. 1, p. 113-130.
Ehrichs et al., “A scanning tunneling microscope/scanning electron microscope system for the fabrication of nanostructures,” Mar. 1, 1992, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology: Part B, US, American Institute of Physics, New York, vol. 9, No. 2 Part 02, p. 1380-1383.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Integrated microcolumn and scanning probe microscope arrays does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Integrated microcolumn and scanning probe microscope arrays, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Integrated microcolumn and scanning probe microscope arrays will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2888880

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.