Data processing: software development – installation – and managem – Software program development tool – Translation of code
Reexamination Certificate
1999-06-30
2002-11-12
Dam, Tuan Q. (Department: 2124)
Data processing: software development, installation, and managem
Software program development tool
Translation of code
C717S146000, C717S130000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06481008
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to programming tools, and more particularly to tools for instrumenting and optimizing heterogeneous programs written for different computer architectures.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE/PERMISSION
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. The following notice applies to the software and data as described below and in the drawings hereto: Copyright © 1998, Microsoft Corporation, All Rights Reserved.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In a new programming paradigm, a program is now a collection of components. Each component publishes an interface without exposing its inner details. Thus, a component can internally exist in any form: Intel x86 binary, Intel IA-64 binary, Visual Basic (VB) byte codes, Java class files, or any Virtual Machine (VM) binary. A heterogeneous program consists of components in different forms. Heterogeneous programs already exist in some environments: in the Microsoft Windows 32-bit environment, a Visual Basic program is compiled into VB byte codes that can call native-compiled functions in a separate dynamic linked library. Similarly Java class files can call native functions. Intel's IA-64 architecture allows IA-64 code to co-exist with x86 code.
To understand the behavior of a heterogeneous program, all its components, regardless of their form, have to be instrumented and analyzed in the same framework, otherwise, only partial information will be collected. It is important to note that systems that have been ported to several architectures are not sufficient to handle heterogeneous programs. For example, a system for VB byte codes that has been ported to x86, cannot provide a complete execution time analysis of a heterogeneous program consisting of VB byte codes and native x86 because each system operates in isolation on its own input.
Further, a heterogeneous program may consist of heterogeneous components. A heterogeneous component is a single component consisting of routines in different instruction sets. As the interface is well defined, components internally can use any instruction set. Each instruction set has its own advantages such as execution time, portability, and size.
All previous systems have been designed for homogeneous programs: conventional programs consisting of components in the same form. Some systems have been targeted to different architectures, but cannot work with heterogeneous programs. None of these systems can generate a heterogeneous component.
A large number of systems have been developed to help analyze and optimize homogeneous programs. The creation of “Pixie” by MIPS Computers Systems, Inc. in 1986 started a class of basic block counting tools by inserting pre-determined sequence of instructions to record execution frequencies of basic blocks. “Epoxie” extended the technique by using relocations to eliminate dynamic translation overheads. David W. Wall.
Systems for late code modification
, in Code Generation—Concept, Tools Techniques, pp. 275-293, (Robert Giegrich and Susan L. Graham, eds, 1992). “QPT” further extended the technique by constructing spanning trees to reduce the number of basic blocks that are instrumented. James Larus and Thomas Ball,
Rewriting executable files to measure program behavior
, Software, Practice and Experience, vol. 24, no. 2, pp 197-218 (1994). “Purify” instruments memory references to detect out-of-bounds memory accesses and memory leaks. Reed Hastings and Bob Joyce, Purify:
Fast Detection of Memory Leaks and Access Errors
, Proceedings of Winter Usenix Conference, January 1992.
“OM” allowed general transformations to be applied to a binary by converting the binary to an intermediate representation that can be easily manipulated. Amitabh Srivastava and David Wall,
A Practical System for Intermodule Code Optimization at Link Time
, Journal of Programming Language, 1(1):1-18 (1993). OM has been implemented on MIPS, DEC Alpha and Intel x86 architectures. “EEL” uses a similar technique and provides an editing library for Sun SPARC architectures. James R. Larus and Eric Schnarr, EEL:
Machine
-
Independent Executable Editing
, Proceedings of SIGPLAN '95 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (1995). “Alto” and “Spike” are optimizers for the DEC Alpha architectures. K. De Bosschere and S. Debray, Alto:
a Link
-
Time Optimizer for the DEC Alpha
. Technical Report TR-96-16, Computer Science Department, University of Arizona (1996). David W. Goodwin,
Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis in an Executable Optimizer
, Proceedings of SIGPLAN '97 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (1997).
“ATOM” extended OM by providing a flexible instrumentation interface for the DEC Alpha and Intel x86 systems. Amitabh Srivastava and Alan Eustace, ATOM:
A System for Building Customized Program Analysis Tools
, Proceedings of SIGPLAN '94 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (1994). However, ATOM does not allow modifications to a binary. “Etch” provided a similar system for x86 and “BIT” for Java byte codes. T. Romer, G. Voelker, D. Lee, A. Wolman, W. Wong, H. Levy, B. Chen, and B. Bershad,
Instrumentation and Optimization of Win
32/Intel Executables Using Etch, Proceedings of the USENIX Windows NT Workshop (1997). Han Lee and Benjamin Zorn,
BIT: A Tool for instrumenting Java bytecodes
. Proceedings of the 1997 USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (1997).
None of these systems work on heterogeneous programs. Some of them have been ported to multiple architecture but they provide only a partial view when applied to heterogeneous programs as each implementation operates on its input in isolation. Although OM builds a symbolic representation, the representation was primarily designed for applying arbitrary transformations and is not sufficient to handle heterogeneous programs. None of these systems can generate heterogeneous components. ATOM provides a flexible interface for instrumentation only.
To understand the behavior of a heterogeneous program, all its components, regardless of their form, have to be instrumented and analyzed in the same framework, otherwise, only partial information will be collected. It is important to note that systems that have been ported to several architectures are not sufficient to handle heterogeneous programs. For example, a system for VB byte codes that has been ported to x86, cannot provide a complete execution time analysis of a heterogeneous program consisting of VB byte codes and native x86 because each system operates in isolation on its own input. Similarly, optimizing a heterogeneous program can require rearranging instructions across platform boundaries but such whole program optimization is known to provide performance advantages when the program is executed.
Therefore, there is a need to represent a heterogeneous program and its heterogeneous components in a fashion that permits the behavior of the program to be evaluated across architectural boundaries and optimization to be performed on the entire program.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The above-mentioned shortcomings, disadvantages and problems are addressed by the present invention, which will be understood by reading and studying the following specification.
Pre-defined performance tools enable instrumentation and optimization of a heterogeneous program by modifying a platform-neutral intermediate representation (IR) of the program. The intermediate representation is hierarchy of base elements that correspond to instructions, code blocks, procedures and components within the program. Each base element exports an application program interface (API) that provides for navigation, querying and modification of the corresponding element in the hierarchy. An API for th
Chaiken Ronnie I.
Edwards Andrew J.
Lefor John A.
Liu Jiyang
Pierce Ken B.
Dam Tuan Q.
Hennings Mark R.
Merchant & Gould
Microsoft Corporation
LandOfFree
Instrumentation and optimization tools for heterogeneous... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Instrumentation and optimization tools for heterogeneous..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Instrumentation and optimization tools for heterogeneous... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2967788