X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices – Specific application – Lithography
Reexamination Certificate
2000-08-31
2002-04-30
Bruce, David V. (Department: 2882)
X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices
Specific application
Lithography
C378S034000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06381300
ABSTRACT:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from the prior Japanese Patent Application No. 11-280499, filed Sep. 30, 1999, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an exposure mask suitable for various beam exposure schemes using a charged beam or X-rays and, more particularly, to an exposure mask in which positional distortion of a mask pattern due to internal stress is corrected, and a method of manufacturing the exposure mask.
In recent years, circuit devices represented by LSI devices are rapidly shrinking in feature size, and therefore photolithography currently used as a micropatterning technique on the commercial level will soon become unable to form a minimum line width of several ten nm or less because of its resolution capability limit. Demand has arisen for the development of a microfabrication technique that can take the place of the current photolithography. A candidate that can meet this requirement is lithography using short wavelength VUV (Vacuum Ultra Violet) light, X-rays, or an electron beam.
A
1
X X-ray lithography exposure using X-rays irradiates a wafer
33
with X-rays
31
through an X-ray exposure mask
30
with a mask pattern to transfer the mask pattern onto an X-ray resist
32
, as shown in FIG.
1
. The X-ray exposure mask
30
has a structure having a 1- to 5-&mgr;m thick membrane (X-ray transparent supporting film)
2
made of an element with light weight which transmits X-rays, such as silicon nitride, silicon carbide, silicon, or diamond, and an X-ray absorber pattern
4
formed on the membrane
2
to absorb X-rays, and is supported by a reinforcing frame
7
and Si substrate frame
1
. The Si substrate frame
1
is used to minimize distortion in the X-ray absorber pattern
4
because the membrane
2
is very thin and mechanically weak.
To manufacture this X-ray exposure mask, first membrane films are formed on both surfaces of an Si substrate, and an etching stopper & anti-reflection film, X-ray absorber film, and pattern transfer etching hard mask film are formed on one surface. Next, the membrane film on the lower surface side of the Si substrate is removed by etching, the Si substrate at the opening portion is removed by back etching, and the Si substrate frame is reinforced by bonding a reinforcing frame. Then, a resist pattern is formed by electron beam exposure and development, the pattern transfer etching hard mask film is etched, and the resist is removed. Finally, the X-ray absorber film is etched, and the pattern transfer etching hard mask is removed to form an X-ray absorber pattern on the membrane film, thus completing to fabricate an X-ray exposure mask.
The in-plane pattern image placement accuracy of the conventional X-ray exposure mask obtained by the above method is evaluated by measuring displacements (in-plane distortion; IPD) of the formed pattern with respect to a desired pattern using an image placement measurement apparatus (LMS-IPRO available from Leica). As shown in
FIG. 2
, pattern displacements are observed. Referring to
FIG. 2
, the broken lines indicate the desired positions, and the solid lines indicate the actually measured positions.
Generated IPD values are 11 nm on average and 43 nm for 3&sgr;. The maximum displacement amount is 49 nm. The displacements occurred almost in one direction. For example, the overlay accuracy required to realize a 150-nm rule device by X-ray lithography is 50 nm for ⅓ the design rule. If this includes 30 nm as a value allowable for the mask, the pattern accuracy measured above is insufficient.
Required image placement accuracy cannot be obtained probably because each of the resist film, pattern transfer hard mask film, absorber film, membrane film, and etching stopper film, which form the mask, has (1) internal stress, (2) film thickness distribution, and (3) internal stress distribution. The pattern position is displaced in proportion to the difference in the product of film thickness by stress (forces acting inside the film) in each region of films forming the X-ray exposure mask. As examples,
FIGS. 3A and 3B
show pattern distortions generated by tensile stress and compression stress of the X-ray absorber film, respectively.
When an X-ray absorber pattern is formed from the X-ray absorber film
4
having tensile stress at a desired (resist) pattern position by etching, the absorber pattern position is displaced outward from the center, as shown in
FIG. 3A
, because internal stress at the etched (removed) portion of the absorber film is released. On the other hand, when the X-ray absorber film has compression stress, the absorber pattern position after etching is displaced toward the central portion, as shown in
FIG. 3B
, relative to the (resist) pattern at the desired position. If the pattern density changes all over the pattern area, the pattern position is displaced from the desired position in accordance with the pattern density.
In not only the X-ray absorber film but all films forming the mask, if internal stress is present, a displacement from a desired position occurs. Since the pattern position is displaced in proportion to the product of film thickness by stress (forces acting inside the film), the pattern position is largely displaced from the desired position if the film thickness changes in the plane. Even when the film has internal stress distribution, IPD occurs.
In the conventional X-ray exposure mask manufacturing, mainly, the materials and processes are optimized to uniform the in-plane distribution of internal stress in each film of the mask, and for a film (except the membrane film) formed by etching, internal stress is reduced, thereby suppressing IPD. However, these methods are still poor in film reproducibility and have problems in obtaining a required image placement accuracy.
A method of improving image placement accuracy after mask formation has been proposed in which ions are implanted into a membrane film immediately under a pattern, and film stress is changed using the effect that the ions enter the crystal of the membrane film to increase the lattice spacing, thereby suppressing distortion attributed to an X-ray absorber pattern using the out-plane distortion of the membrane film (Jpn. Pat. Appln. KOKAI Publication No. 4-196211).
Another method of improving image placement accuracy after pattern formation has been proposed in which a membrane film is etched, or ions are implanted into the membrane film to increase/decrease the film thickness or film stress (Jpn. Pat. Appln. KOKAI Publication No. 7-94395). Still another method of improving the pattern accuracy of a mask has been proposed in which a stretchable film is deposited on the lower surface of a mask substrate around the X-ray exposure region, thereby reducing the concave mask distortion to planarize the film (Jpn. Pat. Appln. KOKAI Publication No. 5-90137).
In all of the prior-art techniques, any pattern distortion due to degradation in planarity can be reduced, though fabrication of a considerably uniform membrane film, non-warp frame, and X-ray absorber film controlled to low stress is required, resulting in technical difficulty. Requirements for in-plane uniformity such as film thickness and stress are also severe. When a membrane film is etched, the X-ray transparency largely changes to result in a variation in pattern size. In addition, since the membrane film serves as a supporter, its etching is undesirable from the viewpoint of stability.
An electron beam projection lithography mask using a reduction image projection technique, a SCALPEL (SCattering with Angular Limitation for Projection Electron Lithography) mask, or a stencil mask also has a structure in which an electron scattering pattern is formed on a membrane film, as in the X-ray exposure mask. Requirements for formation of a low-stress thin film and in-plane uniformity such as film thickness and stress are severe, and prior-art techniques have the same technical diff
Bruce David V.
Hobden Pamela R.
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
LandOfFree
Exposure mask, exposure mask manufacturing method, and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Exposure mask, exposure mask manufacturing method, and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Exposure mask, exposure mask manufacturing method, and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2843207