Process for charged particle beam micro-machining of copper

Chemistry: electrical and wave energy – Processes and products – Coating – forming or etching by sputtering

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C204S192350, C204S192370, C216S066000, C216S078000, C216S079000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06824655

ABSTRACT:

TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to micro-machining copper using a charged particle beam in the presence of an etching assisting agent.
BACKGROUND
Aluminum, tungsten, and copper have been used for metal interconnections in integrated circuits. Copper is particularly desirable, especially in high performance integrated circuits, because of its low resistivity. In a typical operation, the copper is deposited into spaces micro-machined, using a global lithographic process, into the surface of a dielectric material such as silicon dioxide, to yield a series of metal interconnections in a predetermined pattern.
Charged particle beam micro-machining, assisted by a specific chemistry process, has been a useful process for local micro-machining metal interconnections during integrated circuit design and troubleshooting. Focused ion beam (FIB) micro-machining has been particularly useful in this regard, especially in debugging, editing, validation, metrology, and process control. In charged particle beam micro-machining, a metal trace is exposed to a beam of, e.g., gallium ions, often in the presence of a specific chemistry to assist removal of the metallization. Charged particle beam micro-machining has been used successfully to micro-machine aluminum and tungsten traces, resulting in fast and clean cutting.
Problems have arisen, however, in the case of copper. Certain chemistries, such as those based on iodine are generally inapplicable to copper metallizations. Iodine-based chemistries can spontaneously etch copper and corrode exposed copper within hundreds of microns from the initial beam exposure point. This corrosion can present serious reliability issues such as high resistivity, electrical leakage, and ultimately, conductor failure.
Copper traces consist of micro grains with various crystallographic orientations, causing the micro grains to etch at different rates. The presence of these micro grains leads to strongly pronounced channeling in the copper at some orientations. The net result is that the copper etches unevenly, thereby limiting the utility of charged particle beam processes in micro-machining copper interconnections. Furthermore, an underlying dielectric layer can experience some damage due to the uneven etching.
What is desired is a process that enhances the use of charged particle beam processes so that etching can be performed with minimal re-deposition and provide clean electrical isolation. It would also be desirable to provide a process that gives the capability of precisely milling copper, to ensure high isolation resistance so as to provide the electric isolation necessary for circuit modifications.
SUMMARY
The invention provides a process for micro-machining semiconductor materials that advantageously improves the etching and separation (e.g. cutting) of copper interconnections. Deeply buried traces can be cut in a substrate using the inventive process.
In one aspect of the invention, the process includes micro-machining a substrate in the presence of an etch assisting agent using a charged particle beam and thereby, forming a disconnection or separation in the copper. The process includes: (a) providing a substrate that includes a dielectric layer and copper overlying the dielectric layer; and (b) etching the copper with a charged particle beam in the presence of an etch assisting agent. The etch assisting agent can include ammonia, acetic acid, thiolacetic acid, or combinations thereof.
The invention provides a process for etching copper using a compatible chemistry, where the chemistry assists in achieving a relatively high selectivity of copper with respect to the underlying dielectric layer, resulting in cleaner, more even milling and cuts. By increasing the selectivity of copper, surface roughness development is decreased under ion bombardment. Reductions are also achieved in the re-deposition of the etched material and the electrical conductivity of any material that may be re-deposited.
DEFINITIONS
The following terms are intended to have the following meanings:
“Selectivity” is the ratio between the removal rates of copper (Cu) and the dielectric material (measured under the same conditions); and
“Removal rate” and “etch rate” is the average thickness change per unit time, and is provided in e.g., microns/per sec.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5140164 (1992-08-01), Talbot et al.
patent: 5336363 (1994-08-01), Morita
patent: 5616921 (1997-04-01), Talbot et al.
patent: 5700526 (1997-12-01), Ximen et al.
patent: 5747818 (1998-05-01), Cecere
patent: 5766379 (1998-06-01), Lanford et al.
patent: 5798529 (1998-08-01), Wagner
patent: 5840630 (1998-11-01), Cecere et al.
patent: 5851413 (1998-12-01), Casella et al.
patent: 5899740 (1999-05-01), Kwon
patent: 5958799 (1999-09-01), Russell et al.
patent: 5959358 (1999-09-01), Lanford et al.
patent: 6031229 (2000-02-01), Keckley et al.
patent: 6057223 (2000-05-01), Lanford et al.
patent: 6140655 (2000-10-01), Russell et al.
patent: 6322672 (2001-11-01), Shuman et al.
patent: 6407001 (2002-06-01), Scott
patent: 6509276 (2003-01-01), Scott
patent: 6514866 (2003-02-01), Russell et al.
patent: 2001/0053605 (2001-12-01), Phaneuf et al.
patent: 2002/0094694 (2002-07-01), Russell et al.
patent: 2002/0195422 (2002-12-01), Sievers et al.
patent: 2003/0038113 (2003-02-01), Makarov et al.
patent: 2003/0060048 (2003-03-01), Russell et al.
patent: 02-295117 (1990-06-01), None
patent: 04-173988 (1992-06-01), None
Goldblatt et al., “Unique and Practical IC Timing Analysis Tool Utilizing Intrinsic Photon Emission,”Microelectronics Reliability Conference, 2001, 41(9-10):1507-1512.
Knebel et al., “Diagnosis and Characterization of Timing-Related Defects by Time-Dependent Light Emission,”IEEE International Test Conference, 1998, pp. 733-739.
Lundquist et al., “Ultra-Thinning of C4 Integrated Circuits for Backside Analysis during First Silicon Debug,”Microelectronics Reliability Conference, 2001, 41(9-10):1545-1549.
Lundquist amd McManus, “Characterize Gate-Level Transistor Performance with PICA,”Semiconductor International, 2001, 4 pgs.
Makarov et al., “Practical FIB Chemistry for Etching Copper,”Present atAVS Third International Conference on Microelectronics and Interfaces(ICMI), Feb. 12, 2002, 3 pgs.
Musil et al., “Focused Ion Beam Microsurgery for Electronics,”IEEE Electron Device Letters, 1986, EDL-7(5):285-287.
Edinger, “Gas assisted etching of copper with focused ion beams,”J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 1999, 17(6):3058-3062.
Igarashi et al., “Dry Etching Technique or Subquarter-Micron Copper Interconnects,”J. Electrochem. Soc., 1995, 142(3):L36-L37.
R. Bender et al., “Focused Ion Beam Analysis of Organic Low-k Dielectrics,” Proceeding from the 26th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Nov. 12-16, 2000, pp. 397-405.
K. Edinger, et al., “Study of precursor gases for focused ion beam insulator deposition,” J.Vac.Sci.Technol.B 19(6), Nov./Dec. 1998, pp. 3311-3314.
J. Gonzalez et al., “Chemically enhanced focused ion beam micromachining of copper,” J.Vac.Sci.Technol.B 19(6), Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2539-2542.
J. Gonzalez et al., “Improvements in focused ion beam micromachining of interconnect materials,” J.Vac.Sci.Technol.B 20(6), Nov./Dec. 2002, pp. 2700-2704.
S. Herschbein et al., “The Challenges of FIB Chip Repair & Debug Assistance in the 0.25um Copper Interconnect Millenium,” Proceedings from the 24th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Nov. 15-19, 1998, four pages.
P.Ho et al., Low Dielectric Constant Materials for IC Applications, Springer Verlag, 2003, Chapter 1, pp. 1-21.
V. Makarov et al., “Dry Etching Considerations fro Copper Metallizations,” Proceedings of the 4th AVS International Conference on Microelectronics and Interfaces, Mar. 3-6, 2003, p. 198 (3 pages).
J.Phillips et al., “Channeling effects during focused-ion-beam micromachining of copper,” J.Vac.Sci.Technol.B 18(4), Jul./Aug. 2000, pp. 1061-1065.
J.Phillips et al., “H2O enhanced focused ion beam micromachining,” J.Vac.Sci.Technol.B 13(6), Nov./Dec. 1995, pp. 2565-2569.
S.Pauthner, “Devicce modification and gas assisted etc

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Process for charged particle beam micro-machining of copper does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Process for charged particle beam micro-machining of copper, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Process for charged particle beam micro-machining of copper will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3335365

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.