Electrical computers and digital data processing systems: input/ – Intrasystem connection – Bus access regulation
Reexamination Certificate
1997-10-01
2001-11-27
Lefkowitz, Sumati (Department: 2181)
Electrical computers and digital data processing systems: input/
Intrasystem connection
Bus access regulation
C361S689000, C361S731000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06324608
ABSTRACT:
RELATED APPLICATIONS
The subject matter of U.S. patent application entitled “FAULT TOLERANT COMPUTER SYSTEM”, filed on Oct. 1, 1997, application Ser. No. 08/942,194, is related to this application.
APPENDICES
Appendix A, which forms a part of this disclosure, is a list of commonly owned copending U.S. patent applications. Each one of the applications listed in Appendix A is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by reference thereto.
COPYRIGHT RIGHTS
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files of records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Network servers and the accompanying local area networks (LANs) have expanded the power and increased the productivity of the work force. It was just a few years ago that every work station had a standalone personal computer incapable of communicating with any other computers in the office. Data had to be carried from person to person by diskette. Applications had to be purchased for each standalone personal computer at great expense. Capital intensive hardware such as printers were duplicated for each standalone personal computer. Security and backing up the data were immensely difficult without centralization.
Network servers and their LANs addressed many of these issues. Network servers allow for resource sharing such as sharing equipment, applications, data, and the means for handling data. Centralized backup and security were seen as definite advantages. Furthermore, networks offered new services such as electronic mail. However, it soon became clear that the network servers could have their disadvantages as well.
Centralization, hailed as a solution, developed its own problems. A predicament that might shut down a single standalone personal computer would, in a centralized network, shut down all the networked work stations. Small difficulties easily get magnified with centralization, as is the case with the failure of a network server interface card (NIC), a common dilemma. A NIC may be a card configured for Ethernet, LAN, or Token-Ring to name but a few. These cards fail occasionally requiring examination, repair, or even replacement. Unfortunately, the entire network has to be powered down in order to remove, replace or examine a NIC. Since it is not uncommon for modern network servers to have sixteen or more NICs, the frequency of the problem compounds along with the consequences. When the network server is down, none of the workstations in the office network system will be able to access the centralized data and centralized applications. Moreover, even if only the data or only the application is centralized, a work station will suffer decreased performance.
Frequent down times can be extremely expensive in many ways. When the network server is down, worker productivity comes to a stand still. There is no sharing of data, applications or equipment such as spread sheets, word processors, and printers. Bills cannot go out and orders cannot be entered. Sales and customer service representatives are unable to obtain product information or pull up invoices. Customers browsing or hoping to browse through a network server supported commercial web page are abruptly cut off or are unable to access the web pages. Such frustrations may manifest themselves in the permanent loss of customers, or at the least, in the lowering of consumer opinion with regard to a vendor, a vendor's product, or a vendor's service. Certainly, down time for a vendor's network server will reflect badly upon the vendor's reliability. Furthermore, the vendor will have to pay for more service calls. Rebooting a network server, after all, does require a certain amount of expertise. Overall, whenever the network server has to shut down, it costs the owner both time and money, and each server shut down may have ramifications far into the future. The magnitude of this problem is evidenced by the great cost that owners of network servers are willing to absorb in order to avoid down time through the purchase of uninterruptible power supplies, surge protects, and redundant hard drives.
What is needed to address these problems is an apparatus that can localize and isolate the problem module from the rest of the network server and allow for the removal and replacement of the problem module without powering down the network server.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention includes methods of removing and replacing data processing circuitry. In one embodiment, the method comprises changing an interface card in a computer comprising removing a network interface module from the computer without powering down the computer and removing an interface card from the network interface module. The further acts of replacing the interface card into the network interface module and replacing the network interface module into the computer without powering down the network computer are also performed in accordance with this method.
Methods of making hot swappable network servers are also provided. For example, one embodiment comprises a method of electrically coupling a central processing unit of a network server to a plurality of network interface modules comprising the acts of routing an I/O bus having a first format from the central processing unit to primary sides of a plurality of bus adaptor chips and routing an I/O bus of the same first format from a secondary side of the bus adaptor chips to respective ones of the network interface modules.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4100597 (1978-07-01), Fleming et al.
patent: 4449182 (1984-05-01), Rubinson et al.
patent: 4692918 (1987-09-01), Elliott et al.
patent: 4695946 (1987-09-01), Andreasen et al.
patent: 4707803 (1987-11-01), Anthony, Jr. et al.
patent: 4774502 (1988-09-01), Kimura
patent: 4821180 (1989-04-01), Gerety et al.
patent: 4835737 (1989-05-01), Herrig et al.
patent: 4894792 (1990-01-01), Mitchell et al.
patent: 4949245 (1990-08-01), Martin et al.
patent: 4999787 (1991-03-01), McNally et al.
patent: 5006961 (1991-04-01), Monico
patent: 5007431 (1991-04-01), Donehoo, III
patent: 5033048 (1991-07-01), Pierce et al.
patent: 5073932 (1991-12-01), Yossifor et al.
patent: 5103391 (1992-04-01), Barrett
patent: 5118970 (1992-06-01), Olson et al.
patent: 5121500 (1992-06-01), Arlington et al.
patent: 5123017 (1992-06-01), Simpkins et al.
patent: 5136708 (1992-08-01), Lapourtre et al.
patent: 5136715 (1992-08-01), Hirose et al.
patent: 5138619 (1992-08-01), Fasang et al.
patent: 5210855 (1993-05-01), Bartol
patent: 5245615 (1993-09-01), Treu
patent: 5247683 (1993-09-01), Holmes et al.
patent: 5261094 (1993-11-01), Everson et al.
patent: 5265098 (1993-11-01), Mattson et al.
patent: 5269011 (1993-12-01), Yanai et al.
patent: 5272382 (1993-12-01), Heald et al.
patent: 5272584 (1993-12-01), Austruy et al.
patent: 5276814 (1994-01-01), Bourke et al.
patent: 5276863 (1994-01-01), Heider
patent: 5277615 (1994-01-01), Hastings et al.
patent: 5280621 (1994-01-01), Barnes et al.
patent: 5283905 (1994-02-01), Saadeh et al.
patent: 5307354 (1994-04-01), Cramer et al.
patent: 5311397 (1994-05-01), Harshberger et al.
patent: 5311451 (1994-05-01), Barrett
patent: 5317693 (1994-05-01), Cuenod et al.
patent: 5329625 (1994-07-01), Kannan et al.
patent: 5337413 (1994-08-01), Lui et al.
patent: 5351276 (1994-09-01), Doll, Jr. et al.
patent: 5367670 (1994-11-01), Ward et al.
patent: 5379184 (1995-01-01), Barraza et al.
patent: 5379409 (1995-01-01), Ishikawa
patent: 5386567 (1995-01-01), Lien et al.
patent: 5388267 (1995-02-01), Chan et al.
patent: 5402431 (1995-03-01), Saadeh et al.
patent: 5404494 (1995-04-01), Garney
patent: 5423025 (1995-06-01), Goldman et al.
patent: 5430717 (1995-07-01), Fowler et al.
patent: 5430845 (1995-07-01), Rimmer et al.
patent: 5432715 (1995-07-01), Shigematsu et al.
patent: 5438678 (1995-08-01), Smith
patent: 544
Agneta Don
Amdahl Carlton G.
Henderson Michael G.
Papa Stephen E. J.
Schiro Don
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
Lefkowitz Sumati
Micron Electronics
LandOfFree
Method for hot swapping of network components does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for hot swapping of network components, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for hot swapping of network components will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2614337