Organic compounds -- part of the class 532-570 series – Organic compounds – Silicon containing
Reexamination Certificate
2001-05-24
2004-03-30
Barts, Samuel (Department: 1621)
Organic compounds -- part of the class 532-570 series
Organic compounds
Silicon containing
C556S453000, C556S431000, C556S462000, C502S158000, C502S401000, C502S407000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06713643
ABSTRACT:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
None
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to organofunctionalized microporous to mesoporous silica compositions. In particular, the present invention relates to mesostructured silica compositions in which an open framework structure is formed through a high degree of linking between adjacent LSiO
3
, O
3
Si—R—siO
3
, and SiO
4
units, where L and R are organofunctional groups.
(2) Description of Related Art
Organofunctional, mesostructured silica compositions have been recognized as useful materials, particularly molecular as sieves, for use as catalysts for a variety of organic chemical transformations, as trapping agents for metal cation contaminants, as adsorbents for the separation of organic molecules, and as film-forming compositions for electronic applications. These hybrid organic-inorganic compositions can be prepared through two conceptually and practically distinct chemical pathways. The first pathway, denoted the “grafting pathway”, is based on the post-synthesis functionalization of a pre-formed pure silica mesostructure. This approach relies on the grafting of organofunctional silanes to the surface silanol groups, denoted ≡SiOH, of the pre-formed mesostructure. Suitable organofunctional silane reagents have at least one hydrolyzable group attached to the organofunctional silicone center.
Theses grafting reagents have the general formula: L
4-x
SiY
x
where L is one or more of the desired organofunctional groups and Y is a hydrolyzable group (typically alkoxide or halide) and x is 1, 2, or 3.
The condensation reaction of a surface silanol groups on the surface of the pre-formed molecular sieve with hydrolyzable groups on the grafting reagent couples the functional organo groups to the surface according to the overall reaction represented below to produce an organofunctional surface.
Here ≡Si—OH represents the surface silanol group and
represents the grafting agent.
Depending on the initial silanol group density on the silica surface and the number of hydrolyzable Y groups on the coupling agent, a distribution of one-, two-, or three Si—O—Si covalent linkages are formed between the silica surface and the organofunctional grafting reagent. If only one linkage is formed between the silica surface and the organosilane containing the organofunctional groups, the linkage can be easily broken through hydrolysis reaction upon exposure to water and the organofunctional group is lost. Three linkages to the silica surface avoids loss of the organic functionality through hydrolysis reaction and two bonds would provide intermediate stability. However, even with LSiY
3
grafting agents, it is virtually impossible to bind all the organofunctional groups to a silica surface through three Si—O—Si covalent linkages. Such grafting reactions always result in the formation of one, two, as well as three, covalent linkages to the surface of the silica because of spatial mismatches between the surface silonol groups on the surface and the hydrolyzable groups on the coupling reagent. A recent review by Liu et al. (J. Phys. Chem. 104, 8328 (2000)) reveals that the reaction of LSiX
3
grafting reagents with mesostructured silica surfaces not only results in fewer than three Si—O—Si linkages to the SiL groups but, in addition, the distribution of the organo groups on the surface is not uniform. Thus, organo-functional molecular sieve silicas formed through coupling reactions with silane grafting reagents are inherently unstable toward hydrolysis and a large portion of the organofunctional groups can be easily dissociated from the surface.
A much more promising approach to forming stable organofunctional mesostructures is to incorporate the organofunctional groups into the molecular sieve framework as it is being assembled from mixtures of organosilicon and silica precursors in the presence of a structure-directing surfactant. In this direct assembly approach the precursor to the organosilicon LSiO
3
units is an organosilane reagents of the type LSiY
3
, where L is the desired organofunctional group and Y is a hydrolyzable group such as an alkoxide or a halogen. The silica precursor to the SO
4
units in the framework is typically a SiY
4
species containing four hydrolyzable groups. The Si—OH groups formed through the hydrolysis of Si—Y bonds in the precursors have a sterically favorable chance of undergoing condensation-polymerization reaction to form fully crosslinked Si—O—Si linkages in the framework. Thus, in comparison to the grafting pathway, the direct assembly method should result in optimal framework crosslinking for improved stability, as well as in a more uniform distribution of organofunctional groups for improved access in the framework pores.
There have been several attempts to prepare organofunctional molecular sieve silicas by direct assembly methods from LSiY
3
and SiY
4
precursors using both ionic surfactants, as well as electrically neutral surfactants as the structure directors (Lim et al., Chem. Mater. 10 467 (1998); Fowler et al., Chem. Commun., 201 (1998); Maquarrie et al., Stud. Surf. Sci, Catal. (2000); Mercier et al., Chem. Mater. 12 188 (2000); Hall et al., Chem. Commun., 201 (1999); Margolese et al., Chem. Mater. 12 2448 (2000); Van Rhijn et al., Chem. Commun. 317 (1998); Richer et al., Chem. Commun. 1775 (1998)). The resulting products all had compositions corresponding to (SiO
2
)
1-x
(LSiO
1.5
)
x
, when written in surfactant-free, dehydroxylated and anhydrous form. However, x-ray diffraction analysis indicated that the compositions were reliably mesostructured only when x, the fraction of functionalized silicon centers in the framework, was less than about 0.20. At x values greater than 0.20, the long-range mesostructured order was normally lost, as indicated by the absence of an x-ray diffraction peak, thus preventing access to most of the organofunctional groups in the composition. Lim et al. (Chem. Mater. 10, 467 (1998)) represents the only report among many that claims an organofunctional silica mesostructure with an x value somewhat greater than 0.20. In this latter case, the x value was said to be 0.28 when L is a mercaptopropyl group and the structure director is a quaternary ammonium ion surfactant. This is the only organofunctional mesostructure said to have an x value that exceeded the normal limiting value of 0.20 when prepared through direct assembly methods. Even if the claimed value x was accurate, the product was microporous (not mesoporous), and the ionic surfactant was difficult to remove. Thus, there is a need to provide for mesostructured organofunctional (SiO
2
)
1-x
(LSiO
1.5
)
x
compositions with x values substantially greater than 0.20, regardless of the nature of the organofunctional group L and a process for producing them.
Another approach to the design of organofunctional mesostructures is based on the surfactant-directed assembly of so-called “bis-silyl” mesostructures with compositions corresponding to [O
1.5
Si—R—SiO
1.5
] when written in surfactant-free, dehydroxylated and anhydrous form (Inagaki, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 121 9611 (1999); Aseta et al., Nature 402 867 (1999); Holland et al., 121 4308 (1999)). Here the R group is an organo group that links two tetrahedrally coordinated silicon centers together through silicon-carbon covalent bonds. These mesostructured compositions are prepared through the hydrolysis of a Y
3
Si—R—SiY
3
precursor, where Y is a hydrolyzable group, in the presence of a suitable surfactant. A typical organic linker group is the ethylene group, —CH
2
CH
2
—. Most but not all of the oxygen atoms on the O
3
Si—R—SiO
3
units comprising the framework bridge adjacent silicon centers to form a framework around the structure-directing surfactant. Hexagonal, cubic, and wormhole framework structures have been reported. Removal of the structure-directing surfactant by solvent extraction produces an open framework structure with atomically disordered (amorphous) [O
1.5
Si—R—SiO
1.5
] walls.
Mori Yutaka
Pinnavaia Thomas J.
Barts Samuel
Board of Trustees of Michigan State University
McLeod Ian C.
LandOfFree
Ultrastable organofunctional microporous to mesoporous... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Ultrastable organofunctional microporous to mesoporous..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Ultrastable organofunctional microporous to mesoporous... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3215246