Stage for charged particle microscopy system

Details Stage for charged particle microscopy system Stage for charged particle microscopy system

1999-05-25

2001-06-26

Nguyen, Thong (Department: 2872)

Optical: systems and elements

Compound lens system

Microscope

C359S391000, C359S394000, C359S383000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06252705

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to charged particle systems, and more particularly to a stage suitable for use in a charged particle system.
2. Description of Related Art
As the critical dimensions of micro-electronic circuits continue to shrink, accuracy of existing optics-based systems in performing such tasks as identifying defects in patterned substrates (e.g., semiconductor wafers, or optical masks) and measuring critical dimensions (e.g., metal line width, contact hole size) declines. For this reason, charged particle microscopy systems, such as charged particle beam (e.g., electron or ion) systems, with their high imaging resolution have gained popularity.
A charged particle microscopy system typically includes a stage moving in two dimensions (X-Y plane) which aims to fulfill these requirements: (i) high mean time before failure (MTBF), (ii) high speed area coverage, (iii) low mechanical vibrations during travel, (iv) high vacuum (1E-6 torr or less) compatibility, (v) minimal interference (from active or passive, static or alternating sources) with the charged particle microscope (lens and beam), (vi) low particle generation, and (vii) a compact structure.
A high MTBF (MTBF is a measure of durability) of the stage is important considering the large volume of wafers moving through a fabrication facility, the number of process steps at which wafer inspection and CD measurements are required, and the relatively small field of view of the microscope's optics column. These considerations also make high speed area coverage essential in achieving a reasonable throughput. Low mechanical vibration is a prerequisite to accurate measurement by the charged particle microscope where, for example, wafer inspection is carried out while the stage is moving (i.e., the magnitude of the stage vibration must be less than the feature size resolvable by the charged particle microscope). High vacuum compatibility is required because in a charged particle beam system the beam cannot travel through air, thus requiring a vacuum environment. The interference with the charged particle microscope from passive or active, static or alternating sources needs to be minimized to ensure high resolution imaging and precision positioning of the beam. Contamination of wafers due to particles generated by the stage must be kept at a minimum to allow the use of the system in-line in the fabrication facility. Lastly, a stage having a compact structure reduces system foot-print. This is particularly important if the system is to be used in a clean room, since the cost of maintaining a clean room is typically proportional to its size. Also, a smaller stage can be housed in a smaller vacuum chamber which is quicker to pump down to the required vacuum.
The X and Y platforms of a stage are typically driven by either magnetic motors (e.g., linear brushless servo motors) or non-magnetic motors (e.g., piezoelectric motors). Because the fixed and moving components of a brushless magnetic motor do not contact one another during operation, both vibration and particle generation by this type of motor are minimal, and its endurance is increased (no wear and tear). These characteristics along with a magnetic motor's high speed and high torque make it a suitable candidate for driving the X and Y platforms. However, magnetic motors contain strong magnets and have a high permeability housing which can severely interfere with the charged particle microscope optics and beam positioning.
Non-magnetic motors do not contain magnetic materials, and are commonly used for precision stage positioning. However, because the fixed and moving components of non-magnetic motors contact one another during operation, they have lower endurance, more vibration, and more particle generation than magnetic motors. Also, non-magnetic motors are generally slower speed and have less torque than magnetic motors.
FIGS. 1
a
and
1
b
show the top (plan) view of a simplified stage
80
which uses magnetic motors to drive both X platform
30
and Y platform
20
(which are stacked). The magnetic motors are located along the edges of the platforms, and are indicated by cross-hatched areas
50
a,
50
b,
60
a,
and
60
b.
In
FIG. 1
a,
the center of a wafer
40
is positioned under a charged particle microscope optics column
10
. As indicated by the distances marked as A and B, column
10
is well separated from magnetic motors
50
a/b
and
60
a/b.
Therefore, the interference by magnetic motors
50
a/b
and
60
a/b
with column
10
is minimal.
However, when the left or right edges of wafer
40
are positioned under column
10
as in
FIG. 1
b,
the distance between column
10
and one of motors
50
a/b
becomes much shorter (as indicated by the distance marked A). Because of the close proximity of motor
50
b
with column
10
, the magnetic material (e.g., magnet assemblies and magnetic shield of the motor) and electro-magnetic field (e.g., motor coils) of motor
50
b
interfere with column
10
.
The interference from the magnetic motors
50
a/b
can be reduced by using a wider platform
20
whereby distance A is increased. However, this results in a larger and heavier platform
20
which requires larger motors for driving both platforms
20
and
30
. This undermines achieving mechanical precision and the above seven requirements for a stage.
Using non-magnetic motors to drive the X and Y platforms eliminates the interference problem, but causes other inhibiting problems such as mechanical vibration, particle generation, slow area coverage, and low endurance.
Given the shortcomings of each of the magnetic and non-magnetic motors, a stage for use in a charged particle microscopy system is needed which fulfills at least the above-mentioned seven requirements.
SUMMARY
In accordance with the invention, a stage suitable for use in a charged particle microscopy system (but not so limited) integrates a magnetic motor and a non-magnetic motor such that: (i) high mean time before failure (MTBF) is achieved, (ii) high speed area coverage is achieved, (iii) mechanical vibrations during travel are minimized, (iv) the stage is high vacuum compatible; (v) interference with the charged particle microscope is minimized, (vi) particle generation is minimized, and (vii) a compact structure is obtained.
The magnetic motor drives the stage along a first axis, and the non-magnetic motor drives the stage along a second axis. In one embodiment, an operational duty cycle of the magnetic motor is substantially greater than the operational duty cycle of the non-magnetic motor.
In another embodiment, the magnetic motor is a brushless linear servo motor, and the non-magnetic motor is a linear piezoelectric motor.
In another embodiment, a constant distance is maintained between the magnetic motor and a microscope located to observe a work-piece on the stage.
In another embodiment, a non-magnetic rotary motor provides rotary motion, wherein an operational duty cycle of the magnetic motor is substantially greater than the operational duty cycle of the non-magnetic rotary motor.
In another embodiment, the magnetic motor, the non-magnetic motor, the non-magnetic rotary motor, and the stage are vacuum compatible.
In another embodiment, the stage includes a first platform which is coupled to the magnetic motor and is movable on a base along the first axis, a second platform which is coupled to the non-magnetic motor and is movable on the first platform along the second axis.
In another embodiment, a rotary table is coupled to the non-magnetic rotary motor and is capable of rotating on the second platform. A microscope is fixed to the base and is located to observe a work-piece on the stage.
In another embodiment, the non-magnetic motor is fixed to the first platform and is enclosed by the first and second platforms. The magnetic motor includes a magnet track assembly which is fixed to the base and defines an opening for receiving a coil assembly, the opening facing away from the microscope.
In another embodiment, the stag

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Stage for charged particle microscopy system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Stage for charged particle microscopy system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Stage for charged particle microscopy system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2529331