Electrical computers and digital processing systems: virtual mac – Task management or control – Process scheduling
Reexamination Certificate
2004-12-16
2010-11-09
Do, Chat C (Department: 2195)
Electrical computers and digital processing systems: virtual mac
Task management or control
Process scheduling
C715S208000, C715S234000, C705S002000, C705S002000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07831978
ABSTRACT:
A method for creating a review task includes receiving task data, the task data including information on a main task to be performed. Delegation data is received, the delegation data including information identifying a first delegator of the main task and a first delegatee to perform the main task. A review task is created, with the review task having as its object at least aspects of the main task. The review task is assigned to the first delegator of the main task, and review task data is stored based on the completed main task.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5490097 (1996-02-01), Swenson et al.
patent: 5530861 (1996-06-01), Diamant et al.
patent: 5799297 (1998-08-01), Goodridge et al.
patent: 5960404 (1999-09-01), Chaar et al.
patent: 6026365 (2000-02-01), Hayashi
patent: 6088679 (2000-07-01), Barkley
patent: 6101481 (2000-08-01), Miller
patent: 6493731 (2002-12-01), Jones et al.
patent: 6507845 (2003-01-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 6539404 (2003-03-01), Ouchi
patent: 6658568 (2003-12-01), Ginter et al.
patent: 6675261 (2004-01-01), Shandony
patent: 6678716 (2004-01-01), Pronsati, Jr. et al.
patent: 6741232 (2004-05-01), Siedlikowski
patent: 6782379 (2004-08-01), Lee
patent: 6850895 (2005-02-01), Brodersen et al.
patent: 6859523 (2005-02-01), Jilk et al.
patent: 7007232 (2006-02-01), Ross et al.
patent: 7032181 (2006-04-01), Farcasiu
patent: 2002/0029272 (2002-03-01), Weller
patent: 2002/0078432 (2002-06-01), Charisius et al.
patent: 2003/0023675 (2003-01-01), Ouchi et al.
patent: 2003/0149714 (2003-08-01), Casati et al.
patent: 2004/0025048 (2004-02-01), Porcari et al.
patent: 2004/0103014 (2004-05-01), Teegan et al.
patent: 2004/0104939 (2004-06-01), Locke et al.
patent: 2004/0133876 (2004-07-01), Sproule
patent: 2004/0143811 (2004-07-01), Kaelicke et al.
patent: 2004/0148213 (2004-07-01), Aziz et al.
patent: 2005/0028158 (2005-02-01), Ferguson et al.
patent: 2005/0038707 (2005-02-01), Roever et al.
patent: 2006/0107265 (2006-05-01), Schulz et al.
patent: 2006/0136495 (2006-06-01), Schaad
patent: 2007/0016465 (2007-01-01), Schaad
patent: WO-01/33468 (2001-05-01), None
patent: WO-03/017055 (2003-02-01), None
“BEA WebLogic Process Integrator Overview 2.0”, available at http://e-docs.bea.com/wlintegration/v2—0/processintegrator/studio/ch1.htm#1216782 (2001), 11 pgs.
“Monitoring Workflows BEA WebLogic Integration, Release 2.1”, available at http://e-docs.bea.com/wlintegration/v2—1/studio/ch10.htm#1220539 (2001), 19 pgs.
“Workflow Management Coalition”, website: http://www.wfmc.org, 4 pgs.
Bertino, E, et al., “An extended authorization model for relational databases”,IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 9(1) (1997), 85-101.
Damianou, Nicodemos, et al., “Ponder: A Language for Specifying Security and Management Policies for Distributed Systems”, The Language Specification, Version 2.1, Imperial College Research Document, available at http://www-dse.doc.ic.ac.uk/policies, (Apr. 3, 2000), 1-42.
Damianou, Nicodemos, et al., “The Ponder Policy Specification Language”, Policies or Distributed Systems and Networks. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Bristol, UK,, (Jan. 29-31, 2001), 18-39.
Fakas, et al., “A peer to peer architecture for dynamic workflow management”,Information and Software Technology 46, Document available at: http://www.docm.mmu.ac.uk/STAFF/G.Fakas/p2pwf-ist-fakas-bill.pdf,(2004), 423-31.
Jackson, Daniel, et al., “A Micromodularity Mechanism”, Joint 8th European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC) and 9th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE-9), Vienna, Austria, (Sep. 10-14, 2001), 1-14.
Joeris, G, et al., “Workflow Support for Inter-Organizational Engineering and Production Processes”, InInternational Journal of Agile Engineering, Special Issue on Information Management for Productivity Enhancement, (2000), 15 pgs.
Minsky, Naftaly H., et al.,Law-Governed Interaction: a Coordination and Control Mechanism for Heterogeneous Distributed Systems, ACM TOSEM, 9(3), (1-31), 2000.
Moffett, Jonathan D., “Delegation of Authority Using Domain-Based Access Rules”, A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London, and the Diploma of Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, (Jul. 1990, Corrected Sep. 1990), 55-76.
Mullins, J, “Delegation and Management”,British Journal of Administrative Management, 31(7), (1981), 218-224.
Pugh, Derek S.,Organization Theory—Selected Readings, Harmondsworth, Middlesex : Penguin Books, 4th Edition, (1997).
Sandhu, R. S., “Role-based Access Control Models”,IEEE Computer, 29(2), (Feb. 1996), 38-47.
Schaad, Andreas, et al., “Delegation of Obligations”, IEEE Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY 2002), (Jun. 5-7, 2002), 1-11.
Schwartz, D, “A loosely coupled peer to peer workflow system”, Masters Thesis, Technical University of Vienna, Complete document available at: http://www.infosys.tuwien.ac.at/Staff/sd/DA/DanielSchwarz.pdf,(May 13, 2004), 21-66.
Yao, Walt, et al., “A Model of OASIS Role-Based Access Control and its Support for Active Security”, SACMAT-01, Chantilly, Virginia, USA. (May 3-4, 2001), 171-181.
Barka, Ezedin , et al., “Framework for Role-Based Delegation Models”,Proceedings of the 16th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, (2000), 1-8.
Christianson, B. , et al., “Delegation of Responsibilities (Position Paper)”,Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996, (Eds) Security Protocols, LNCS 1550 pp. 118,(1998),1-7.
Georgakopoulos, Diimitrios , et al., “An Overview of Workflow Management: From Process Modeling to Workflow Automation Infrastructure”,Distributed and Parallel Databases, 3, 119-153 (1995)Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston Manufactured in the Netherlands, (1995), 119-153.
Kern, Axel , et al., “An administration concept for the enterprise role-based access control model”,Proceedings of the eighth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, (2003),3-11.
No Author Listed, “The Why and How of Delegations in Distributed Security Systems”, (No Date Listed).
Policy 2001, “Workshop Program, Position Papers, Invited Presentations”,Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, (Jan. 2001).
Schaad, Andreas , “A Framework for Organisational Control Principles”,Doctor of Philosophy—University of York, (Jul. 2003),1-288.
Schaad, Andreas , et al., “A Framework for Organisational Control Principles”,Proceedings of the 18th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, (2002),1-10.
Schaad, Andreas , et al., “An Extended Analysis of Delegating Obligations”,SAP Labs France, (Jul. 2004),1-15.
Schaad, Andreas , et al., “Separation, review and supervision controls in the context of a credit application process: a case study of organisational control principles”,Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computing, (2004), 1380-1384.
Schaad, Andreas , et al., “The Incorporation of Control Principles into Access Control Policies”,Policy 2001: Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems&Networks, Bristol UK, (2001),1-4.
Schaad, Andreas , et al., “The role-based access control system of a European bank: a case study and discussion”,Proceedings of the sixth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, (2001),3-9.
Vogt, Gerald , “Delegation of Tasks and Rights”,12th International Worshop on Distributed Systems: Operations and Management, (Oct. 15-17, 2001), 1-11.
Zhang, Longhua , et al., “A Rule-Based Framework for Role-Bases Delegation and Revocation”,ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, vol. 6, No. 3 Aug. 2003, pp. 404-441, (Aug. 2003), 1-38.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/183,272, Response filed Jul. 21
Do Chat C
SAP (AG)
Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
To Jennifer N
LandOfFree
Review mechanism for controlling the delegation of tasks in... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Review mechanism for controlling the delegation of tasks in..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Review mechanism for controlling the delegation of tasks in... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4251119