X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices – Specific application – Computerized tomography
Reexamination Certificate
2000-03-31
2004-01-06
Kim, Robert H. (Department: 2882)
X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices
Specific application
Computerized tomography
C378S207000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06674834
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to imaging systems and, more particularly, to a phantom for use in evaluating substance scoring using imaging system-generated images.
Imaging systems include a source that emits signals (including but not limited to x-ray, radio frequency, or sonar signals), and the signals are directed toward an object to be imaged. The emitted signals and the interposed object interact to produce a response that is received by one or more detectors. The imaging system then processes the detected response signals to generate an image of the object.
For example, in computed tomography (CT) imaging, an x-ray source projects a fan-shaped beam which is collimated to lie within an X-Y plane of a Cartesian coordinate system and generally referred to as the “imaging plane”. The x-ray beam passes through the object being imaged, such as a patient. The beam, after being attenuated by the object, impinges upon an array of radiation detectors. The intensity of the attenuated beam radiation received at the detector array is dependent upon the attenuation of the x-ray beam by the object. Each detector element of the array produces a separate electrical signal that is a measurement of the beam attenuation at the detector location. The attenuation measurements from all the detectors are acquired separately to produce a transmission profile.
In known third-generation CT systems, the x-ray source and the detector array are rotated with a gantry within the imaging plane and around the object to be imaged so that the angle at which the x-ray beam intersects the object constantly changes. A group of x-ray attenuation measurements, i.e. projection data, from the detector array at one gantry angle is referred to as a “view”. A “scan” of the object comprises a set of views made at different gantry angles during one revolution of the x-ray source and detector. In an axial scan, the projection data is processed to construct an image that corresponds to a two-dimensional slice taken through the object.
One method for reconstructing an image from a set of projection data is referred to in the art as the filtered backprojection technique. This process converts the attenuation measurements from a scan into integers called “CT numbers” or “Hounsfield units”, which are used to control the brightness of a corresponding pixel on a cathode ray tube display.
To reduce the total scan time required for multiple slices, a “helical” scan may be performed. To perform a “helical” scan, the patient is moved while the data for the prescribed number of slices is acquired. Such a system generates a single helix from a one-fan-beam helical scan. The helix mapped out by the fan beam yields projection data from which images in each prescribed slice may be reconstructed. In addition to reduced scanning time, helical scanning provides other advantages such as improved image quality and better control of contrast.
It is known to use imaging data to identify evidence of disease by detecting and quantifying, i.e. “scoring”, substances that may be present in a patient's system. One known software system, for example, analyzes CT images of the heart to quantify amounts of calcium in coronary regions of interest. Scoring is based upon the volume and Hounsfield unit of a calcified region. A number called the “calcium score” expresses the quantity of calcium present in the patient's arterial system.
It would be desirable to provide a method for verifying accuracy of substance-scoring systems. It also would be desirable to provide a method for measuring the validity, reproducibility and repeatability of a substance score for different imaging systems (e.g. CT single-slice or multi-slice), for different scanning methods (e.g. CT helical or axial), and for different image reconstruction algorithms.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
There is therefore provided, in one embodiment, a method for evaluating substance scoring, the scoring based on imaging system-generated images of an object having regions of interest due to possible presence of the substance, the method including the steps of simulating the regions of interest using a phantom having a plurality of volumes, each volume having dimensions simulating dimensions of a region of interest, each volume having a density representative of a substance density; generating images of the phantom; scoring the substance based on the phantom images; and comparing results of the substance scoring to expected phantom-image results.
The above-described phantom and method allow a scoring system user to verify substance scoring accuracy and to compare scores resulting from different imaging systems, scanning methods and reconstruction algorithms.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4182311 (1980-01-01), Seppi et al.
patent: 4352020 (1982-09-01), Horiba et al.
patent: 4646334 (1987-02-01), Zerhouni
patent: 4837686 (1989-06-01), Sones et al.
patent: 4870666 (1989-09-01), Lonn
patent: 4873707 (1989-10-01), Robertson
patent: 4985906 (1991-01-01), Arnold
patent: 5034969 (1991-07-01), Ozaki
patent: 5335260 (1994-08-01), Arnold
patent: 6154516 (2000-11-01), Heuscher et al.
patent: 6224257 (2001-05-01), Launay et al.
patent: 6233304 (2001-05-01), Hu et al.
patent: 6314313 (2001-11-01), Romeas et al.
patent: 6421552 (2002-07-01), Hsieh
patent: 1 016 376 (2000-07-01), None
patent: 1 092 392 (2001-04-01), None
patent: WO 00/33252 (2000-06-01), None
Lynn S. Broderick et al.; “Measurement of Coronary Artery Calcium with Dual-Slice Helical CT Compared with Coronary Angiography: Evaluation of CT Scoring Methods, Interobserver Variations, and Reproducibility”; AJR:167; Aug. 1996; pp. 439-444.
Hyo-Chun Yoon, MD, PhD., et al.; “Coronary Artery Calcium: Alternate Methods for Accurate and Reproducible Quantitation”; AUR; Oct. 1997; vol. 4, No. 10; pp. 666-673.
Arthur S. Agatston, MD, FACC, et al.; “Quantification of Coronary Artery Calcium Using Ultrafast Computed Tomography”; JACC vol. 15, No. 4; Mar. 15, 1990; pp. 827-832.
Yuji Ukai et al.; “A Coronary Calcification Diagnosis System Based on Helical CT Images”; IEEE; 1998; pp. 1208-1212.
Wilson et al.; “Automated Detection of Microcalcifications in Mammograms through Application of Image Pixel Remapping and Statistical Filter”; Eleventh IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems; pp. 270-274.
Okhashi et al.; “Application of a Neural Network to Automatic Gray-level Adjustment for Medical Images”; IEEE vol. 2 of 3; Nov. 1991; pp. 974-980.
“Catphan”, 32 page (17 page as photocopied) brochure; Product of the Phantom Laboratory.*
PCI SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP, “PCI Local Bus Specification, Revision 2.2,” pp. i-ii, 52-61 (Dec. 1998).
“Liquid-Phil™ Phantoms”; 8-page (4-page as photocopied) brochure; Product ofThe PhantomLaboratory.
“Magphan®”; 24-page (13-page as photocopied) brochure; Product ofThe PhantomLaboratory.
“Quantification of Coronary Artery Calcium Using Ultrafast Computed Technology”; Agatston et al.; Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 827-832 (Mar. 15, 1990).
“R S VP Pelvis™”; 6-page (3-page as photocopied) brochure; Product ofThe PhantomLaboratory.
“R S V P Phantom™ Radiosurgery Verification Phantom”; 8-page (4-page as photocopied) brochure; Product ofThe PhantomLaboratory.
“Sectional Phantoms”; 8-page (4-page as photocopied) brochure; Product ofThe PhantomLaboratory.
“The Phantom Patient™”; 8-page (4-page as photocopied) brochure; Product ofThe PhantomLaboratory.
“The RANDO® Phantom”; 8-page (4-page as photocopied) brochure; Product ofThe PhantomLaboratory.
“Welcome to The Phantom Laboratory”; 28-page (15-page as photocopied) brochure; Product ofThe PhantomLaboratory.
“Three-Dimensional Biomedical Imaging”, Richard A. Robb, Ph.D., vol. 1 Chapter 5, pp. 139-146; CRC Press, Inc. (1985).
“Development and Assessment of Real Cardiac Motion Simulation Phantom”; Article [in Japanese]; Kimura F. et al.; Nippon Acta Radiologica; 61(1):29-32 (Jan. 2001).
“Vascular Surgery” (‘Saphenous Vein Harvesting’, ‘Saphenous Vein Harvesting-Balloon’, ‘Heart Surgery’); 3-page document; [obt
Acharya Kishore C.
Heinold Thad A.
Armstrong Teasdale LLP
GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company LLC
Horton Esq. Carl B.
Kim Robert H.
Song Hoon K.
LandOfFree
Phantom and method for evaluating calcium scoring does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Phantom and method for evaluating calcium scoring, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Phantom and method for evaluating calcium scoring will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3235036