MOSCAP design for improved reliability

Active solid-state devices (e.g. – transistors – solid-state diode – Field effect device – Having insulated electrode

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C257S532000, C257S411000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06420747

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) devices such as metal oxide semiconductor capacitors (MOSCAPs), complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) field effect transistors (FETs) and bipolar transistors such as lateral pnp devices, and in particular to an improved design for MOS devices which enhances the reliability of the same. The MOS devices of the present invention have improved reliability since substantially little or no oxide breakdown at the R
x
corner or edge occurs during device biasing.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A major factor that inhibits prior art MOS devices such as MOSCAPs is the overlap of the gate polysilicon and the R
x
edge of the semiconducting substrate. The term “R
x
edge” is used herein to denote the area of the semiconducting material which is bounded by the shallow trench isolation (STI) region. A typical prior art MOSCAP structure is shown in FIGS.
1
(
a
)-(
b
). Specifically, FIG.
1
(
a
) is a top view of a prior art MOSCAP structure, whereas FIG.
1
(
b
) is a cross-sectional view of the same structure. In such structures, the shallow trench isolation (STI) corner or R
x
edge region (hereinafter referred to as just the R
x
edge) becomes an emitter of hot electrons when the base plate becomes negatively biased. These hot electrons degrade the oxide reliability.
The above overlap problem is not something that can be typically avoided since the prior art requires the same for eliminating the possibility of damaging the gate oxide when contacting the gate polysilicon with a metal contact.
For STI designs, the contact problem is alleviated by placing the gate polysilicon over the R
x
edge so that the gate can be contacted over the trench oxide. This design, however, results in a less reliable MOSCAP structure due to the high electrical field formed at the R
x
edge when the bottom plate of the MOSCAP is biased negative. The resulting device is thus unreliable due to a greater potential for oxide breakdown at the R
x
edge.
FIG. 2
shows another prior art MOS device. Specifically,
FIG. 2
illustrates a top view of a prior art field effect transistor (FET) design. In this figure, the gate polysilicon also overlaps the R
x
edge; therefore the above problem exists for this prior art FET design as well.
In view of the above mentioned drawback with prior art MOS designs, there is a need for a new MOS device which eliminates the overlap of the gate polysilicon with the R
x
edge of the device. Such a design would allow for fabricating MOS devices which have a greater reliability than those currently be used.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One object of the present invention is to provide a highly reliable MOS device which eliminates the thin oxide areas over STI corners, i.e. the R
x
edge.
Another object of the present invention is to design a MOS device which provides a solution for contacting the gate polysilicon over an R
x
structure.
A further object of the present invention is to design a MOS device which has improved series resistance to the doped gate region of the device.
These and other objects and advantages are met by utilizing a MOS device which comprises: a semiconducting substrate; a first doped region formed in said semiconducting substrate; a dielectric region formed on said first doped region, wherein said dielectric region has a substantially thicker portion comprising a nitride pad formed over a screen oxide layer; a gate region formed over said dielectric region, said gate region being doped with a n- or p-type dopant; and an electrical contact connected directly to said gate region over the substantially thicker portion of said dielectric region.
The term “MOS device” is used herein to denote MOSCAP devices, FET devices, bipolar transistors such as lateral pnp devices as well as other MOS devices which contain a gate region for controlling the device.
Another aspect of the present invention relates to a method of fabricating the above described MOS devices. Specifically, the method of the present invention comprises the steps of:
(a) providing a MOS structure, said structure comprising a semiconducting substrate having a screen oxide formed on a portion of said semiconducting substrate;
(b) implanting a first impurity region in said semiconducting substrate using said screen oxide as an implantation mask;
(c) forming a nitride pad on said screen oxide;
(d) removing portions of said nitride pad and said screen oxide, but leaving a stack region of said nitride pad and said screen oxide on said semiconducting substrate;
(e) forming a dielectric layer abutting said stack region so as to form a dielectric region having a substantially thicker portion;
(f) forming a gate region over said dielectric region;
(g) patterning said gate region and said dielectric region so as to provide a structure having said gate region over said substantially thicker portion of said dielectric region;
(h) doping said patterned gate region with a n- or p-type dopant; and
(i) forming metal contacts on said doped gate region over said substantially thicker portion and over said first doped region.
In one embodiment of the invention, step (h) occurs before the patterning step, i.e. between steps (f) and (g).


REFERENCES:
patent: 3597667 (1971-08-01), Horn
patent: 3865649 (1975-02-01), Beasom
patent: 4001869 (1977-01-01), Brown
patent: 4212100 (1980-07-01), Paivinen et al.
patent: 4214252 (1980-07-01), Goerth
patent: 4295264 (1981-10-01), Rogers
patent: 4639274 (1987-01-01), Krishna
patent: 4737830 (1988-04-01), Patel et al.
patent: 4758873 (1988-07-01), Monticelli
patent: 4929989 (1990-05-01), Hayano
patent: 5006480 (1991-04-01), Chang et al.
patent: 5264723 (1993-11-01), Strauss
patent: 5296734 (1994-03-01), Satoh
patent: 5341009 (1994-08-01), Young et al.
patent: 5525533 (1996-06-01), Woodruff et al.
patent: 5565699 (1996-10-01), Kaneko et al.
patent: 5608258 (1997-03-01), Rajkanan et al.
patent: 5643820 (1997-07-01), Williams et al.
patent: 5650645 (1997-07-01), Sone et al.
patent: 5739052 (1998-04-01), Krishnan et al.
patent: 5793074 (1998-08-01), Choi et al.
patent: 6087696 (2000-07-01), Li et al.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

MOSCAP design for improved reliability does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with MOSCAP design for improved reliability, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and MOSCAP design for improved reliability will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2865270

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.