Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Discount or incentive
Reexamination Certificate
2005-02-08
2005-02-08
Hapiz, Tariq R. (Department: 3623)
Data processing: financial, business practice, management, or co
Automated electrical financial or business practice or...
Discount or incentive
C345S215000, C345S215000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06853975
ABSTRACT:
A method of rating employee performance includes: a) receiving a list of nominated raters from the employee, including at least one manager of the employee, a plurality of the employee's peers, and a plurality of the employee's direct reports; b) electronically soliciting and receiving manager approval of the list of nominated raters; c) electronically notifying the approved raters with instructions for rating the employee; and d) receiving employee ratings data from the approved raters, wherein the steps of electronically soliciting and electronically notifying are automated. The process also includes training all users of the system in a manner in which the ratings are calibrated by comparing case studies to specific behavioral examples to provide immediate feedback to the user in a training process which is fully automated.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4671772 (1987-06-01), Slade et al.
patent: 5602982 (1997-02-01), Judd et al.
patent: 5795155 (1998-08-01), Morrel-Samuels
patent: 5924072 (1999-07-01), Havens
patent: 5926794 (1999-07-01), Fethe
patent: 5987443 (1999-11-01), Nichols et al.
patent: 5991595 (1999-11-01), Romano et al.
patent: 6085184 (2000-07-01), Bertrand et al.
patent: 6119097 (2000-09-01), Ibarra
patent: 6457975 (2002-10-01), Miranda et al.
Tziner et al. “Investigation of raters' and ratees' reactions to three methods of performance appraisal: BOS, BARS, and GRS,” Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, Dec. 1997. [retrieved from Proquest].*
Holtz. “Strategizing a human resources presence on the Internet,” Compensation & Benefits Management, Autumn 1997. [retrieved from Proquest].*
Fink et al. “Training as a performance appraisal improvement strategy,” Career Development International, 1998. [retrieved from Proquest].*
“HR Software Pioneer Criterion Announces New Web-Based Human Resource Planning Software,” Business Wire, May 20, 1998. retrieved from Proquest].*
Lumpur et al. “The essential requirements of an effective appraisal system,” New Straits Times, Sep. 14, 1998. [retrieved from Proquest].*
Hamilton, Martha. “Mantra for a Company Man; New Age Approaches Increasingly Popular in Management Training,” The Washington Post, Jun. 30, 1996. [retrieved from Proquest].*
“Geac SmartStream Delivers New Self-Service Web Application for Human Resources,” Business Wire, Jun. 29, 1998. [retrieved from Proquest].*
Hucke, Mark. “Auckland firm unveils electronic staff review,” Dominion, Sep. 14, 1998. [retrieved from Proquest].*
Poe, Randall. “Fast forward,” Across the Board, Jul./Aug. 1998. [retrieved from Proquest].*
Longenecker et al. “Performance Appraisal Effectiveness: A Matter of Perspective,” S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, Spring 1992. [retrieved from Proquest].*
Arvey et al. “Performance evaluation in work settings,” Annual Review of Psychology, 1998. [retrieved from Proquest].*
Boice et al. “Designing effective performance appraisal systems” Work Study, 1997. [retrieved from Proquest].*
Yehuda et al. “Multi-source performance appraisal: An empirical and methodological note,” Public Administration Quarterly, Spring 1993. [retrieved from Proquest].*
Bracken et al. “High-tech 360,” Training & Development, Aug. 1998. [retrieved from Proquest].*
Hauenstein et al. “From Laboratory to Practice: Neglected Issues in Implementing Frame-of-Reference Rater Training,” 1989. [retrieved from Proquest].
Dirksen William P.
Fish W. Jim
Johnson Staci L.
McDaniel Tamara L.
Rauschenberger John M.
Colon C. Michelle
Ford Motor Company
Hapiz Tariq R.
Kelley David B.
LandOfFree
Method of rating employee performance does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method of rating employee performance, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method of rating employee performance will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3444478