Semiconductor device manufacturing: process – Chemical etching – Combined with the removal of material by nonchemical means
Reexamination Certificate
2001-03-12
2002-12-24
Mills, Gregory (Department: 1765)
Semiconductor device manufacturing: process
Chemical etching
Combined with the removal of material by nonchemical means
C438S692000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06498102
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to the manufacture of semiconductor devices, and more particularly, the present invention relates to the planarization of the surface of an insulation layer by chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) using a ceria-based slurry.
2. Description of the Related Art
As the degree of integration of microelectronic devices continues to increase, planarization processes used in the fabrication of such devices become more and more critical. That is, efforts to achieve highly integrated semiconductor devices are typically attended by the stacking of multiple interconnection and other layers on a semiconductor wafer. The resultant unevenness of the wafer surface presents a variety of problems which are well-documented in the art. Planarization processes are thus adopted at various stages of fabrication in an effort to minimize irregularities in the wafer surface.
One such planarization technique is chemical/mechanical polishing (CMP). In CMP, the wafer surface is pressed against a polishing pad in relative rotation. During polishing, an abrasive and chemically reactive solution known as a CMP slurry is made to flow into the polishing pad. This CMP technique planarizes the wafer surface by means of chemical and physical reactions, that is, by supplying the chemically reactive slurry as a thin film on a patterned surface of the wafer while at the same time physically pressing the relative rotating surface of the polishing pad against the surface of the wafer.
One common application of CMP is in shallow trench isolation (STI). In STI techniques, relatively shallow isolation trenches are formed which function as field regions used to separate active regions on a wafer. In this process, a nitride (SiN) stop layer is deposited over on a semiconductor substrate. The nitride stop layer is then patterned and etched to form trenches which extend through the nitride stop layer and into the semiconductor substrate. Thereafter, an insulating oxide layer (which will ultimately forms the trench oxide regions) is deposited so as to fill the trenches and cover the surface of the nitride stop layer. The oxide layer is then subjected to CMP so as to remove the oxide layer down to the level of the nitride stop layer. In particular, during the CMP process, the oxide layer is removed until the upper surface of the nitride stop layer is exposed. Due to differing chemical and physical characteristics thereof, the oxide and nitride layers exhibit different removal rates when subjected to CMP using known slurries. The ratio of these removal rates at least partially defines the “selectivity” of the slurry being used. The lower the selectivity of the slurry, the more nitride that will be polished away during the CMP process.
Recently, ceria-based slurries (hereinafter, referred to as “ceria slurries”) have been introduced which contain cerium oxide particles and which provide suitable abrasive characteristics for insulation layers containing SiO
2
as a major component. These ceria slurries have a relatively high oxide-to-nitride selectivity of about 45:1. In contrast, commonly used silica-based slurries (hereinafter, referred to as “silica slurries”) have oxide-to-nitride selectivities of about 4:1. As such, the stopper function of the nitride stop layer is more effective using ceria slurries. Further, variations in the thickness of the nitride layer after CMP processing are minimized.
One drawback of ceria slurries, however, resides in fact that the oxide removal rate thereof drops sharply in the case where the oxide surface being polished is uneven and/or contains pattern steps. In contrast, the oxide removal rate of silica slurries is not dependent on whether the oxide surface being polished is uneven and/or contains pattern steps.
Two examples in which the oxide surface being polished is uneven or contains pattern steps are described below with reference to FIG.
1
and
FIG. 2
, which are sectional views for use in explaining conventional trench refill processes in the manufacture of semiconductor devices at a comparatively small design rule.
In
FIG. 1
, a nitride pattern
12
having a predetermined surface configuration is formed over a semiconductor substrate
10
. Exposed portions of the semiconductor substrate
10
are then etched to a predetermined depth to form a plurality of trenches. These trenches are then filled with a material which is highly flowable and thus exhibits a favorable filling property, such as a high density plasma oxide (HDP) material, thereby resulting in a first oxide layer
22
. The favorable filling property of the material ensures sufficient step coverage (without voids) even for trenches having high aspect ratios which are typically resident in a cell array region. Further, as shown in
FIG. 1
, the HDP material is also deposited on the nitride layer
12
between the trenches. These portions of the first oxide layer
22
are shown in
FIG. 1
as having triangular cross-sections. Then, a conformable material which forms a second oxide layer
24
is deposited to a uniform thickness over the first oxide layer
22
. Examples of the material of the second oxide layer
24
include borophosphosilicate glass (BPSG), undoped silicate glass (USG), and plasma-enhanced tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS). The cross-sectional profile of the first oxide layer
22
is reflected in the surface configuration of the second oxide layer
24
. That is, as shown in
FIG. 1
, local steps A are formed in the surface of the second oxide layer
24
. In addition, local steps B are formed between the cell array region having relatively narrow trenches and a peripheral circuit region having relatively wide trenches.
The configuration of
FIG. 2
differs from that of
FIG. 1
in that a single oxide layer
24
is deposited in the configuration of
FIG. 2
(i.e., the deposition of a highly flowable layer
22
of
FIG. 1
is omitted). As shown, even in the absence of the initial deposition of the layer
22
, the underlying trenches of the cell array region create local steps C in the surface of the second oxide layer
24
(e.g., USG layer). Also, as shown, local steps similar to the steps B of
FIG. 1
are formed between the cell array region having relatively narrow trenches and a peripheral circuit region having relatively wide trenches.
FIG. 3
is a graph which comparatively shows CMP performances of silica and ceria slurries in the polishing of the stepped-surface cell array region to reduce or eliminate the local steps B shown in FIG.
1
. The results of
FIG. 3
were measured with respect to a semiconductor substrate
10
in which an HDP first oxide layer
22
and a PE-TEOS second oxide layer
24
were deposited in sequence. In
FIG. 3
, the plot “a” for silica slurry shows an oxide removal rate of about 3000 Å/min in the cell array region. The same result is observed when the CMP is applied under the same conditions to an oxide layer which does not have a stepped surface. In contrast, the plot “b” for ceria slurry shows an oxide removal rate of about 160 Å/min in the cell array region. This oxide removal rate is very low when compared to the CMP performance of ceria slurry (about 3300 Å/min, not shown) when applied to a oxide layer which does not have surface steps. The sharp degradation of the oxide removal rate of the ceria slurry tends to occur where the oxide layer surface of the cell array region contains steps as shown in FIG.
1
and FIG.
2
.
For these reasons, the conventional CMP process is carried out in two stages. In a first stage, the silica slurry is first utilized to polish the oxide layer since is has a high removal rate that is not degraded by the presence of steps in the oxide surface. Then, in a second stage, the ceria slurry is utilized to again polish the oxide layer since it exhibits a high oxide-to-nitride selectivity and thus enhances the stopper function of the nitride pattern. This need for two different process stages using two different slurries increases the overall compl
Hah Sang-rok
Kim Jung-yup
Park Young-rae
Chen Kin-Chan
Samsung Electronics Co,. Ltd.
Volentine & Francos, PLLC
LandOfFree
Method for planarizing a semiconductor device using... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method for planarizing a semiconductor device using..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method for planarizing a semiconductor device using... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2957597