Radiant energy – Inspection of solids or liquids by charged particles
Reexamination Certificate
2002-03-07
2004-09-07
Lee, John R. (Department: 2881)
Radiant energy
Inspection of solids or liquids by charged particles
C250S492200, C318S592000, C318S685000, C318S696000, C310S317000, C324S762010, C216S002000, C216S062000, C216S083000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06787768
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention is related generally to the field of Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM), Near field Scanning Optical Microscopy (NSOM), NanoSpectroPhotometry (NSP), NanoPolarimetry (NP), Magnetic Field Microscopy (MFM) and any other methods adaptable and suitable to guide scanning and nanomachining techniques. These technologies are sometimes collectively referred to as Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM). Specifically, the present invention relates generally to micro-objects (structures smaller than 200 microns) and more particularly to micro-objects used as tool tips in a SPM system for making measurements and/or modifications on a target object.
An AFM works by scanning a tip over a surface much the same way as a phonograph needle scans a record. The tip is located at the end of a cantilever beam and positioned over the surface to be scanned. The combination of the cantilever beam and tip is sometimes referred to collectively as a scanning probe or simply a probe.
AFM techniques rely on the effects of the inter-atomic interactions, such as van der Waals forces, that arise between the atoms in the structure of the tip and the atoms at the surface being imaged. As the tip is attracted to the surface, the cantilever beam is deflected. The magnitudes of the deflections correspond to the topological features of the atomic structure of the surface being scanned. The AFM can work with the tip touching the sample (contact mode), or the tip can tap across the surface (tapping mode), or made to not touch the surface at all (non-contact mode, which is the preferred embodiment).
STM techniques rely on the fact that the electron probability cloud associated with the atoms at the surface extends a very small distance above the surface as described by the quantum physical model. When a tip is brought sufficiently close to such a surface, there is an increasingly stronger probability of an interaction (current) between the electron cloud on the surface and that of the tip atom. An electric tunneling current flows when a small voltage is applied. The tunneling current is very sensitive to the distance between the tip and the surface. These changes in the tunneling current with distance as the tip is scanned over the surface are used to produce an image of the surface.
Nanomachining involves removal, addition, or movement of material on a surface in a controlled manner to attain specific surface features. Typically, an appropriate scanning probe is manipulated so that its tip comes into contact with a surface to be nanomachined. The scanning probe is then translated along a pre-programmed vector, producing a scraping action across the contacted surface and removing an amount of material from the surface. An appropriate feed is applied to control the amount of material removed. This is repeated until the desired features are achieved. Any surface which is exposed to contact by the scanning probe can be nanomachined. Thus, for example the walls of a vertical structure can be nanomachined using a scanning probe having an appropriately shaped tip applied to the wall with an appropriate feed force.
FIG. 1
is a generalized diagram illustrating a typical SPM system
10
. A scanning probe
12
is the workhorse of the SPM. A typical probe comprises a cantilever and a tip disposed at the free end of the cantilever. Various tip shapes and configurations suitable for scanning and nanomachining are disclosed in the various above-identified commonly owned issued patents and commonly owned, co-pending patent applications.
FIG. 2
shows a typical arrangement of a scanning probe
12
suitable for use with the present invention. A cantilever
14
is attached to a body member
16
which provides structure for attachment to a probe translation apparatus. Disposed at the free end of the cantilever is an appropriately shaped probe tip
102
.
Referring back to
FIG. 1
, the probe
12
can be coupled to a first translation stage
18
. The first translation stage can provide movement of the probe in the X-Y plane. By convention, the X-Y plane is the plane parallel to the major surface of a workpiece
20
. Thus, the probe can be positioned in the X-Y position relative to the workpiece by the first translation stage. The first translation stage can also provide movement of the probe in the Z-direction and thus position the probe in three-dimensional space relative to the workpiece. Such first translation stages are known and well understood devices. Typically, they are piezoelectric devices.
Alternatively, a second translation stage
22
can be provided. The workpiece
20
can be affixed to the second translation stage to provide X-Y motion of the workpiece relative to the probe
12
. Furthermore, the second translation stage can provide motion of the workpiece in the Z direction relative to the probe. Such stages are typically linear motors, or precision ball screw stages or combinations thereof with linear scale or interferometric position feedback.
The relative motion between the probe
12
and the workpiece
20
can be achieved by any of a number of techniques. The probe can be translated in three dimensions while maintaining the workpiece in a stationary position. Conversely, the workpiece can move relative to a stationary probe. Both the probe and the workpiece can be moved in a coordinated fashion to achieve rapid positioning. The first translation stage
104
might provide only X-Y motion, while Z-axis positioning is provided by the second translation stage
106
; or vice-versa. These and still other combinations of concerted motions of the probe and the workpiece can be performed to effect relative motion between the probe and the workpiece.
A detection module
24
is coupled to detect signal received from the scan probe
12
. Many detection techniques are known. For example, if the probe is operated in AFM (atomic force microscopy) mode, the cantilever resonance point is shifted by the interatomic forces acting between the tip and the surface as the tip is scanned across the surface. A generalized controller
26
can be configured to provide various computer-based functions such as controlling the components of the system
10
, performing data collection and subsequent analysis, and so on. Typically, the controller is some computer-based device; for example, common architectures are based on a microcontroller, or a general purpose CPU, or even a custom ASIC-based controller. A user interface
28
is provided to allow a user to interact with the system. The “user” can be a machine user. A machine interface might be appropriate in an automated environment where control decisions are provided by a machine.
A data store
30
contains various information to facilitate scanning and nanomachining operations and for overall operation of the system
10
. The data store contains the programming code that executes on the controller
26
. The data store shown in the figure can be any appropriate data storage technology, ranging from a single disk drive unit to a distributed data storage system.
In the past, tool tips used to make measurements and/or modifications on a target object in a system such as the system
10
have been unable to measure or modify extremely fine features on the target object because such tool tips have not been successfully reduced to sufficiently small physical dimensions. As features to be modified or measured become smaller and smaller, the relatively immense size of known tool tips has become a limiting factor in the performance achievable using such tool tips. In addition, the shapes of previous tool tips failed to provide measurements that sufficiently resolve particular features and dimensions in a target object. These known shapes also failed to provide modifications requiring certain spatially confined cuts or particular cut angles.
Furthermore, previous tool tips suffered from wear and became dull with usage. The need to sharpen or replace tool tips adds significant costs in both time and expense to reduce the effectiveness of mod
Kley Victor B.
LoBianco Robert T.
General Nanotechnology LLC
Hashmi Zia R.
Lee John R.
Townsend and Townsend / and Crew LLP
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for tool and tip design for... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for tool and tip design for..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for tool and tip design for... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3222241