Method and apparatus for scheduling the processing of...

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: virtual mac – Task management or control

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

08065678

ABSTRACT:
A method and apparatus for scheduling the processing of commands by a plurality of cryptographic algorithm cores in a network processor.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3627928 (1971-12-01), Wolper et al.
patent: 3868631 (1975-02-01), Morgan et al.
patent: 4107458 (1978-08-01), Constant
patent: 4434322 (1984-02-01), Ferrell
patent: 4661657 (1987-04-01), Grenzebach et al.
patent: 5070528 (1991-12-01), Hawe et al.
patent: 5161193 (1992-11-01), Lampson et al.
patent: 5235644 (1993-08-01), Gupta et al.
patent: 5307459 (1994-04-01), Petersen et al.
patent: 5377270 (1994-12-01), Koopman et al.
patent: 5592679 (1997-01-01), Yung
patent: 5594869 (1997-01-01), Hawe et al.
patent: 5790545 (1998-08-01), Holt et al.
patent: 5860072 (1999-01-01), Schofield
patent: 5996086 (1999-11-01), Delaney et al.
patent: 6061449 (2000-05-01), Candelore et al.
patent: 6061779 (2000-05-01), Garde
patent: 6064976 (2000-05-01), Tolopka
patent: 6105053 (2000-08-01), Kimmel et al.
patent: 6157955 (2000-12-01), Narad et al.
patent: 6295604 (2001-09-01), Callum
patent: 6341335 (2002-01-01), Kanai et al.
patent: 6363444 (2002-03-01), Platko et al.
patent: 6477646 (2002-11-01), Krishna et al.
patent: 6557095 (2003-04-01), Henstrom
patent: 6606692 (2003-08-01), Hill et al.
patent: 6625150 (2003-09-01), Yu
patent: 6697932 (2004-02-01), Yoaz et al.
patent: 6701432 (2004-03-01), Deng et al.
patent: 6757791 (2004-06-01), O'Grady et al.
patent: 6785390 (2004-08-01), Hiraide
patent: 6829315 (2004-12-01), Cruikshank
patent: 6853635 (2005-02-01), Beshai
patent: 6868082 (2005-03-01), Allen, Jr. et al.
patent: 6898713 (2005-05-01), Joly et al.
patent: 6971006 (2005-11-01), Krishna et al.
patent: 7069447 (2006-06-01), Corder
patent: 7073067 (2006-07-01), Mizrah
patent: 7082534 (2006-07-01), Tardo
patent: 7165824 (2007-01-01), Walmsley et al.
patent: 7245616 (2007-07-01), Elnathan et al.
patent: 7512945 (2009-03-01), Sydir et al.
patent: 7529924 (2009-05-01), Sydir et al.
patent: 7543142 (2009-06-01), Sydir et al.
patent: 2002/0035681 (2002-03-01), Maturana et al.
patent: 2002/0062444 (2002-05-01), Law
patent: 2002/0078342 (2002-06-01), Matthews, Jr.
patent: 2002/0083317 (2002-06-01), Ohta et al.
patent: 2002/0108048 (2002-08-01), Qi et al.
patent: 2002/0184487 (2002-12-01), Badamo et al.
patent: 2002/0188839 (2002-12-01), Noehring et al.
patent: 2002/0188871 (2002-12-01), Noehring et al.
patent: 2002/0188885 (2002-12-01), Sihlbom et al.
patent: 2003/0002509 (2003-01-01), Vandenhoudt et al.
patent: 2003/0046423 (2003-03-01), Narad et al.
patent: 2003/0091036 (2003-05-01), Milliken et al.
patent: 2003/0097481 (2003-05-01), Richter
patent: 2003/0099254 (2003-05-01), Richter
patent: 2003/0108205 (2003-06-01), Joyner et al.
patent: 2003/0118185 (2003-06-01), Lambert
patent: 2003/0135711 (2003-07-01), Shoemaker et al.
patent: 2003/0169877 (2003-09-01), Liu et al.
patent: 2003/0172104 (2003-09-01), Hooman et al.
patent: 2003/0200330 (2003-10-01), Oelke et al.
patent: 2003/0221074 (2003-11-01), Satoyama et al.
patent: 2004/0004964 (2004-01-01), Lakshmanamurthy et al.
patent: 2004/0019782 (2004-01-01), Hawkes et al.
patent: 2004/0019783 (2004-01-01), Hawkes et al.
patent: 2004/0039936 (2004-02-01), Lai
patent: 2004/0117642 (2004-06-01), Mowery et al.
patent: 2004/0131186 (2004-07-01), Kasuya et al.
patent: 2004/0148382 (2004-07-01), Narad et al.
patent: 2004/0225885 (2004-11-01), Grohoski et al.
patent: 2004/0250095 (2004-12-01), Feldman
patent: 2004/0264502 (2004-12-01), Hulmani et al.
patent: 2005/0138368 (2005-06-01), Sydir et al.
patent: 2005/0141715 (2005-06-01), Sydir et al.
patent: 2005/0149725 (2005-07-01), Sydir et al.
patent: 2005/0149744 (2005-07-01), Sydir et al.
patent: 2007/0006150 (2007-01-01), Walmsley
patent: 2009/0287925 (2009-11-01), Sydir et al.
patent: 99/66678 (1999-12-01), None
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,913, mailed on Apr. 7, 2009, 26 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035, mailed on Dec. 18, 2007, 18 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,913, mailed on Sep. 5, 2008, 19 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,913, mailed on Apr. 24, 2008, 24 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,913, mailed on Dec. 26, 2007, 12 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,913, mailed on Jun. 22, 2007, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,913, mailed on Feb. 9, 2007, 12 pages.
“Ultra High Speed ASIC Network Technology that Fully Conforms to International Standard Interface”, FIND, 20(3), 2002, pp. 48-53.
“SATURN User Network Interface for 9.953 Gbit/s”, PMC-Sierra, 2001, 2 pages.
Palkert, T., “Optical Internetworking Forum Report”, Network Elements Incorporated, Nov. 4, 1999,15 pages.
Bergen, C. et al., “Streaming Interface (NPSI) Implementation Agreement”, The Network Processing Forum, Oct. 18, 2002, 87 pages.
“System Packet Interface Level 4 (SPL-4) Phase 2 Revision 1: OC-192 System Interface for Physical and Link Layer Devices”, Optical Internetworking Forum, Oct. 15, 2003, 72 pages.
“Product Brief: Intel IXP2855 Network Processor”, Intel Corporation, 2005, 8 pages.
Venkatachalam, M., “Integrated Data and Control Plane Processing Using Intel(R) IXP23XX Network Processors”, Technology@Intel Magazine, Feb. 2005, 11 pages.
Ramaswamy, R., et al., “Considering Processing Cost in Network Simulations”, ACM SIGCOMM Workshop, Aug. 2003, pp. 47-56.
Chou, W. “Inside SSL: Accelerating Secure Transactions”, IEEE, IT PRO, Sep. 2002, pp. 37-41.
Acharya, M., et al., “Secure Comparison of Encrypted Data in Wireless Sensor Networks”, 2002, 7 pages.
Pereira, R. et al., “The ESP CBC-Mode Cipher Algorithms”, Network Working Group Request for Comments, RFC No. 2451, Nov. 1998, 14 pages.
Yoaz, A. et al., “Speculation Techniques for Improving Load Related Instruction Scheduling”, IEEE, 1999, 12 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,852, mailed on Sep. 3, 2008., 16 pages.
“Intel IXP2850 Network Processor: High-Speed, Secure Content Processing in a Single Chip”, Intel Corporation 2002, pp. 1-6.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,852, mailed on Mar. 19, 2008., 20 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,852, mailed on Dec. 10, 2007, 23 pages.
“Context switch”, Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing, Dec. 18, 1996, 1 page.
Ex Parte Quayle Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035, mailed on Jul. 25, 2008, 5 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035, mailed on Jun. 11, 2008, 18 pages.
Examiner Interview Summary received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035, mailed on Sep. 24, 2007, 3 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035, mailed Jun. 18, 2007, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035, mailed on Dec. 20, 2006, 19 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035, mailed on Mar. 28, 2007, 15 pages.
Intel IXP2850 Network Processor; High-speed, secure content processing in a single chip, Intel Corporation, http://www.intel.com/design
etwork/prodbrf/25213601.pdf,(2002),1-6 pages.
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035 dated Mar. 28, 2007.
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035 dated Dec. 20, 2006.
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035 dated Jun. 18, 2007.
Response to Final Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035 dated Jun. 11, 2008.
Response to Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035 dated Jun. 11, 2008, 10 pages.
Response to Exparte Quayle Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/749,035 dated Jul. 25, 2008.
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,852 dated Mar. 19, 2008.
Response to Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,852, filed Jun. 2, 2008, 19 pages.
Response to Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,852, filed Nov. 3, 2008, 12 pages.
Respo

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and apparatus for scheduling the processing of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for scheduling the processing of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for scheduling the processing of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4260718

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.