Method and apparatus for reducing worst case power

Static information storage and retrieval – Read/write circuit – Including specified plural element logic arrangement

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C365S189120, C365S230090

Reexamination Certificate

active

06731545

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention pertains to an electronic system and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for reducing the maximum power drawn by the electronic system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
An electronic system typically has a power supply that is selected to provide a sufficient amount of power to the system under all operating conditions. The size of the power supply is determined by the maximum peak power used by the electronic system because the maximum peak power condition is a condition that needs to be handled by the electronic system. The maximum peak power (also called peak power or worst case power) required by the electronic system can sometimes be a relatively large number as compared with average power required by the electronic system.
High peak power typically results in the need for power supplies that are larger, heavier, more costly, and less energy efficient, which is a disadvantage. Moreover, other more costly electronic components may need to be used for an electronic system with a relatively high peak power characteristic. For example, a higher peak power characteristic may require the need for more bypass capacitors and larger bypass capacitors.
In addition, operating an electronic system at or near peak power is typically disadvantageous. When the system operates at or near worst-case conditions, the operating temperature of the circuits and components in the system is generally elevated. If the system operates at or near the worst-case operating condition for an extended period of time, the elevated temperatures may tend to cause failures in the system resulting in a less reliable system. To help to avoid such failures, cooling systems can be included in the electronic systems. Cooling systems, however, typically add cost, complexity, and weight to a system. If fans are added to cool a system, that can result in noise and in power use by the fan. Heat sinks sometimes mean larger packages are required to accommodate the heat sink and to allow for ventilation.
Operating an electronic system at maximum peak power may also increase the amount of electromagnetic interference (“EMI”) generated over time, which could increase amount of EMI shielding required for the electronic system.
For electronic systems that use complementary metal oxide semiconductor (“CMOS”) logic, the power drawn by a circuit or component is shown in Equation 1 below, wherein P is the power drawn by the system, f is the operating frequency or data rate, C is the capacitance, and V is the voltage swing of the voltage output of the circuit.
P=fCV
2
  (Equation 1)
As shown by Equation 1, the power drawn by a CMOS logic gate is directly proportional to the frequency or data rate of the logic gate. Thus, the greater the rate, the greater the power drawn by the logic gate for a given capacitance and voltage swing. Equation 1 also indicates that, for a given capacitance, a maximum amount of power is drawn by a CMOS logic gate when the voltage swing is a maximum amount (e.g., when changing logic states) in every cycle and the logic gate is operating at a maximum data rate.
CMOS logic gates are often used within an integrated device and between integrated devices to drive relatively high capacitance lines. For example, CMOS logic gates are often used in integrated circuits as output buffers to drive, for example, data bus lines. If these gates switch logic states at the maximum data rate, then large amounts of power may be drawn by the system. Even though the data pattern that corresponds to this is atypical, the cooling mechanism must be designed to handle this event. Otherwise, failures in the electronic system could occur as the result of the elevated temperatures. But, as stated above, cooling systems can add cost, complexity, and weight to a system.
FIGS. 1 and 2
show how prior art circuitry can operate at maximum peak power for a given clock frequency.
FIG. 1
is a diagram of prior art circuitry
19
that includes signal line
3
, which is one of the “N” signal lines of data bus
4
. Each of the signal lines of data bus
4
includes buffers
5
and
10
. Signal line
3
includes parasitic capacitance represented by capacitors
21
and
22
. Waveforms
28
,
30
, and
35
represent possible data patterns at respective points
18
,
20
, and
25
of a waveform that is transmitted along signal line
3
.
FIG. 2
is a table showing the toggling of signals along signal line
3
. Column
40
shows a two-period snapshot of possible waveforms at point “A” (reference number
18
). Column
42
shows the number of signal transitions—i.e., toggles—for the possible respective waveforms at point “A.” Column
46
shows a two-period snapshot—i.e., a two-bit snapshot—of possible waveforms at point “B” (reference number
20
). Column
48
sets forth the number of signal transitions, for the respective waveforms at point B. Column
50
shows a two-period snapshot of possible waveforms at point “C” (reference number
25
). Column
52
refers to the number of toggles for the respective waveforms at point C.
Column
54
of
FIG. 2
sets forth the sum of the toggles occurring at points B and C along signal line
3
. The sum in column
52
is for the same wave front traveling through points B and C along signal line
3
. The sum of the toggles at points B and C is zero for the waveforms that have no signal transitions—i.e., the waveforms that stay at zero or a logic one. For the waveforms that toggle from logic one to a logic zero, or from a logic zero to a logic one, the sum of the toggles at points B and C is two because there is one toggle at point B and another toggle at point C.
For a given waveform, when the sum in column
54
is two, that means that the circuitry shown in
FIG. 1
is operating at maximum peak power. For CMOS circuitry, power is consumed during the signal transitions. The more signal toggles there are, the more power consumed by the circuitry. Thus, when the sum of the toggles at buffered areas B and C totals two, that means that the maximum peak power is being consumed for a given clock frequency.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for reducing the worst-case power drawn by a system.
An apparatus for reducing worst-case power consumption is described. The apparatus includes a first signal that has signal transitions. A circuit path is provided for transmitting a second signal through buffered circuit sections. Logic circuitry is coupled to the circuit path and to the first signal to reduce a sum of signal transitions of the second signal as the second signal propagates from one buffered section of the circuit path to another buffered section of the circuit path in order to reduce worst-case power consumption.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4071889 (1978-01-01), Sumida et al.
patent: 4397022 (1983-08-01), Weng et al.
patent: 4646297 (1987-02-01), Palmquist et al.
patent: 4922122 (1990-05-01), Dubujet
patent: 5295188 (1994-03-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 5592424 (1997-01-01), Maeno
patent: 5614841 (1997-03-01), Marbot et al.
patent: 5680354 (1997-10-01), Kawagoe
patent: 5703830 (1997-12-01), Yasuhiro
patent: 5721503 (1998-02-01), Burns et al.
patent: 5881019 (1999-03-01), Koshikawa
patent: 5950233 (1999-09-01), Chu et al.
The International Search Report mailed Dec. 14, 2000 for PCT Counterpart Application No. PCT/US00/25270.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and apparatus for reducing worst case power does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for reducing worst case power, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for reducing worst case power will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3253240

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.