Radiant energy – Inspection of solids or liquids by charged particles – Electron probe type
Reexamination Certificate
2003-06-26
2004-10-12
Berman, Jack I. (Department: 2881)
Radiant energy
Inspection of solids or liquids by charged particles
Electron probe type
C250S307000, C250S305000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06803571
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to electron beam (e-beam) apparatus and e-beam inspection methods.
2. Description of the Background Art
Most conventional wafer and mask inspection systems use light optical images. Scanning electron beam microscopes (SEMs) have also been developed for inspection and critical dimension (CD) measurement. These SEM instruments scan a very small beam over the surface, and record the re-emitted secondary electrons in a single detector. Image acquisition tends to be slower for SEMs than for direct imaging light optical instruments because only one image element (pixel) at a time is recorded.
A low energy emission microscope (LEEM) is a direct imaging (as opposed to scanning) electron microscope. A conventional LEEM uses a single illumination beam which is accelerated typically to about 10 to 30 keV in an electron gun. The single beam passes through a separator magnet that bends the beam into the axis of the objective lens. An image of the gun crossover is transferred to the back focal (diffraction) plane of the objective lens, forming a parallel flood beam that uniformly illuminates the substrate. The substrate is electrically floated at approximately the same voltage as the cathode of the electron gun, so that illuminating electrons are decelerated in the objective lens, striking the substrate at energies typically between 0 to about 1000 eV. Some examples of prior art LEEM systems are described in the review paper: “The continuing development of the low energy electron microscope for characterizing surfaces,” L. Veneklasen, Rev. Sci. Inst. 63(12) p. 5513 (December 1992) and its references.
Insulating surfaces are generally not a problem for light optical inspection because the scattering and reflection of light is insensitive to electrostatic surface charge. Unfortunately, surface charging effects can pose a difficulty for electron beam imaging of insulating surfaces (whether scanned or direct imaging). The rate that a given pixel element charges depends upon the difference between electron flux arriving at and leaving each pixel. The high current densities required for imaging at inspection rates imply a likely high rate of charging if the electron flux leaving the surface is not balanced by that entering. Thus, the surface voltage can quickly reach levels detrimental to imaging or even, in some instances, detrimental to sample integrity. Effective means for controlling local surface charging are therefore desirable if e-beam instruments are to be used for inspection of wafers, masks and other non-conductive substrates.
SUMMARY
In accordance with one embodiment, the invention relates to an apparatus for inspection of substrates. The apparatus includes at least a dual-energy e-beam source, an energy-dependent dispersive device, a beam separator, and an objective lens. The dual-energy e-beam source is configured to generate both a higher-energy e-beam component and a lower-energy e-beam component. Said two components exit the dual-energy e-source co-axially. The energy-dispersive device is configured to introduce dispersion between the two components. The components exit the dispersive device at different angles of trajectory. The beam separator is configured to receive the two dispersed components and substantially cancel the dispersion previously introduced by the dispersive device. As a result, the two components are rejoined in trajectory. Finally, the objective lens configured to focus said two rejoined components onto an area of the substrate.
In accordance with another embodiment, the invention relates to a method for in-line inspection of a substrate. A dual-energy e-beam including a higher-energy e-beam component and a lower-energy e-beam component. Dispersion is introduced between the two e-beam components so that the two e-beam components have different angles of trajectory. Subsequently, the dispersion is substantially canceled so that said two e-beam components are rejoined in trajectory. The two rejoined e-beam components are then focused onto an area of the substrate.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4564758 (1986-01-01), Slodzian et al.
patent: 6586733 (2003-07-01), Veneklasen et al.
patent: 6610980 (2003-08-01), Veneklasen et al.
patent: WO 01/88514 (2001-11-01), None
L. Veneklasen, “The continuing development of the low energy electron microscope for characterizing surfaces”, Dec. 1992, pp. 5513-5532, vol. 63, No. 12, Rev. Sci. Institute of Physics.
J. Chmelik et al. “Comparing cathode lens configuration for low energy electron microscopy”, 1989, pp. 155-160, vol. 83, No. 5, Optik.
Adler David L.
Mankos Marian
Berman Jack I.
KLA-Tencor Technologies Corporation
Okamoto & Benedicto LLP
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for dual-energy e-beam inspector does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for dual-energy e-beam inspector, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for dual-energy e-beam inspector will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3302771