Method and apparatus for determining column dimensions using...

Optics: measuring and testing – Shape or surface configuration

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C356S237500, C356S394000, C438S007000, C438S014000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06650423

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the field of semiconductor device manufacturing and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for determining column dimensions using scatterometry.
2. Description of the Related Art
There is a constant drive within the semiconductor industry to increase the quality, reliability and throughput of integrated circuit devices, e.g., microprocessors, memory devices, and the like. This drive is fueled by consumer demands for higher quality computers and electronic devices that operate more reliably. These demands have resulted in a continual improvement in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, e.g., transistors, as well as in the manufacture of integrated circuit devices incorporating such transistors. Additionally, reducing the defects in the manufacture of the components of a typical transistor also lowers the overall cost per transistor as well as the cost of integrated circuit devices incorporating such transistors.
The technologies underlying semiconductor processing tools have attracted increased attention over the last several years, resulting in substantial refinements. However, despite the advances made in this area, many of the processing tools that are currently commercially available suffer certain deficiencies. In particular, such tools often lack advanced process data monitoring capabilities, such as the ability to provide historical parametric data in a user-friendly format, as well as event logging, real-time graphical display of both current processing parameters and the processing parameters of the entire run, and remote, i.e., local site and worldwide, monitoring. These deficiencies can engender nonoptimal control of critical processing parameters, such as throughput, accuracy, stability and repeatability, processing temperatures, mechanical tool parameters, and the like. This variability manifests itself as within-run disparities, run-to-run disparities and tool-to-tool disparities that can propagate into deviations in product quality and performance, whereas an ideal monitoring and diagnostics system for such tools would provide a means of monitoring this variability, as well as providing means for optimizing control of critical parameters.
Semiconductor devices are manufactured from wafers of a substrate material. Layers of materials are added, removed, and/or treated during fabrication to create the electrical circuits that make up the device. The fabrication essentially comprises four basic operations. Although there are only four basic operations, they can be combined in hundreds of different ways, depending upon the particular fabrication process.
The four operations typically used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices are:
layering, or adding thin layers of various materials to a wafer from which a semiconductor device is produced;
patterning, or removing selected portions of added layers;
doping, or placing specific amounts of dopants in the wafer surface through openings in the added layers; and
heat treatment, or heating and cooling the materials to produce desired effects in the processed wafer.
Among the important aspects in semiconductor device manufacturing are rapid thermal annealing (RTA) control, chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) control, etch control, and photolithography control. As technology advances facilitate smaller critical dimensions for semiconductor devices, the need for reduction of errors increases dramatically. Proper formation of sub-sections within a semiconductor device is an important factor in ensuring proper performance of the manufactured semiconductor device. Critical dimensions of the sub-sections generally have to be within a predetermined acceptable margin of error for semiconductor devices to be within acceptable manufacturing quality.
Generally, most features on a semiconductor device are formed by depositing layers of material (e.g., conductive or insulative) and patterning the process layers using photolithography and etch processes. The various process layers used for forming the features have many specialized functions. Certain layers are used to form conductive features, others are used to form insulating features, and still others are intermediate layers used to enhance the functionality of the processing steps used to pattern and form the functional layers.
There are many variables that affect the accuracy and repeatability of the photolithography and etch processes used to form features from the process layers. Typical metrology data collection for measuring the efficacy of the photolithography and etch processes do not provide data that is sufficiently accurate and timely to facilitate run-to-run control of such processes. Certain techniques, such as scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis, may be used to generate two-dimensional data, such as a critical width dimension, but they cannot be used to characterize the entire feature. For example, to generate a sidewall angle measurement, an important measure of quality, a destructive cross-section SEM analysis is required. Destructive tests are expensive, as they require destruction of the wafer, and thus, it is impractical to perform such tests at a frequency that would allow run-to-run control.
The present invention is directed to overcoming, or at least reducing the effects of, one or more of the problems set forth above.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One aspect of the present invention is seen in a test structure including a plurality of trenches and a plurality of columns defined in the trenches.
Another aspect of the present invention is seen in a method for determining column dimensions. The method includes providing a wafer having a test structure comprising a plurality of trenches and a plurality of columns defined in the trenches; illuminating at least a portion of the columns with a light source; measuring light reflected from the illuminated portion of the columns to generate a reflection profile; and determining a dimension of the columns based on the reflection profile.
Yet another aspect of the invention is seen in a metrology tool. The metrology tool is adapted to receive a wafer having a test structure comprising a plurality of trenches and a plurality of columns defined in the trenches. The metrology tool includes a light source, a detector, and a data processing unit. The light source is adapted to illuminate at least a portion of the columns. The detector is adapted to measure light reflected from the illuminated portion of the columns to generate a reflection profile. The data processing unit is adapted to determine a dimension of the columns based on the reflection profile.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5393624 (1995-02-01), Ushijima
patent: 5736863 (1998-04-01), Liu
patent: 5867276 (1999-02-01), McNeil et al.
patent: 5880838 (1999-03-01), Marx et al.
patent: 5920067 (1999-07-01), Cresswell et al.
patent: 6051348 (2000-04-01), Marinaro et al.
patent: 6245584 (2001-06-01), Marinaro et al.
patent: 6259521 (2001-07-01), Miller et al.
patent: 6316276 (2001-11-01), Gregory et al.
patent: 6327035 (2001-12-01), Li et al.
patent: 6391699 (2002-05-01), Madson et al.
patent: 6436247 (2002-08-01), Sandhu
patent: 6464563 (2002-10-01), Lensing
patent: 6486036 (2002-11-01), Miethke et al.
patent: 6489005 (2002-12-01), Armacost et al.
Bishop et al., “Use of Scatterometry for resist process control,”SPIE Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection and Process Control, 1673:441-452, 1992.
Hickman et al., “Use of diffracted light from latent images to improve lithography control,”SPIE Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection and Process Control, 1464:245-257, 1991.
McNeil et al., “Scatterometry applied to microelectronics processing—Part 1,”Solid State Technology, 37(3):29-56, 1993.
Miller and Mellicamp, “Development of an end-point detection procedure for the post-exposure bake process,”Integrated circuit metrology, inspection, and process control IX: Feb. 20-22, 1995, Santa Clara, California, SPIE Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection and Process Control, 2439:7

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and apparatus for determining column dimensions using... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for determining column dimensions using..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for determining column dimensions using... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3114971

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.