Wells – Processes – With indicating – testing – measuring or locating
Reexamination Certificate
2007-02-27
2007-02-27
Dang, Hoang (Department: 3672)
Wells
Processes
With indicating, testing, measuring or locating
C166S051000, C166S066000, C166S278000, C166S305100
Reexamination Certificate
active
10797161
ABSTRACT:
An intelligent well system and method has a sand face completion and a monitoring system to monitor application of a well operation. Various equipment and services may be used. In another aspect, the invention provides a monitoring system for determining placement of a well treatment. Yet another aspect of the invention is an instrumented sand screen. Another aspect is a connector for routing control lines. It is emphasized that this abstract is provided to comply with the rules requiring an abstract which will allow a searcher or other reader to quickly ascertain the subject matter of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. 37 CFR 1.72(b)
REFERENCES:
patent: 4832121 (1989-05-01), Anderson
patent: 5485745 (1996-01-01), Rademaker et al.
patent: 5992250 (1999-11-01), Kluth et al.
patent: 6004639 (1999-12-01), Quigley et al.
patent: 6355928 (2002-03-01), Skinner et al.
patent: 6554064 (2003-04-01), Restarick et al.
patent: 6561278 (2003-05-01), Restarick et al.
patent: 6847034 (2005-01-01), Shah et al.
patent: 2002/0060070 (2002-05-01), Ramos et al.
patent: 0779409 (1997-06-01), None
Docket Sheet forMemry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959 (S.D. Tex.) (PACER Jun. 2, 2005) (5 pages).
Docket Sheet forMemry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.) (PACER Aug. 11, 2005) (23 pages).
Communication from United States District Court Transferring Case,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959 (S.D. Tex.), dated Sep. 7, 2004 (1 page).
Plaintiffs' Original Complaint,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959, (S.D. Tex.), filed May 14, 2004 (20 pages).
Defendants' Motions (1) to Dismiss the Complaint for Insufficiency of Process and Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, (2) to Dismiss Counts I-III of the Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, and (3) in the Alternative, to Transfer This Action to the Federal District Court for the Northern Distric of California,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959, (S.D. Tex.), filed Jul. 7, 2004 (49 pages), 53 pages?
Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug. 19, 2004 (20 pages).
Answer of Defendants and Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.) filed Nov. 2, 2004 (20 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Answer to Kentucky Oil Technology N.V.'s Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Dec. 3, 2004 (10 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corportation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixith Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
[Proposed] Oder Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
First Amended Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 9, 2005 (16 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Schlumberger Technology Corportation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (29 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Memry Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Memory Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
Opposition of Kentucky Oil to Motions of Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation to Dismiss First Amended Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (29 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Opposition to Counterdefendants's Requests for Judicial Notice in Support of Their Motions to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (9 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Request for Judicial Notice,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (4 pages).
Reply of Schlumberger Technology Corporation to Kentucky Oil Technology's Opposition to First Ammended, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (17 pages).
Schlumberger's Response to Kentucky Oil's Opposition to Counterdefendants' Requests for Judicial Notice,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (3 pages).
Schlumberger's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Exhibits 1, 2, and 4 to the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (3 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Opposition to STC's Motion to Strike Exhibits 1, 3 and 4 to the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Declaration of Benjamin Holl and Portions of Counterdefendants' Reply Briefs,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 25, 2005 (4 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Kentucky Oil's Motion to Strike Declaration of Benjamin Hool and Portions of Counterdefendants' Reply Briefs,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 25, 2005 (2 pages).
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Counterdefendants' Motion to Dismiss,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Apr. 8, 2005 (26 pages).
Plain
Bixenman Patrick W.
Danos Jake A.
Howard Peter V.
Johnson Craig D.
Pai Sudhir
Castano Jaime A.
Dang Hoang
Galloway Bryan P.
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Someren Robert A. Van
LandOfFree
Intelligent well system and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Intelligent well system and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Intelligent well system and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3858473