Abrading – Precision device or process - or with condition responsive... – With indicating
Reexamination Certificate
1999-11-05
2001-09-04
Rose, Robert A. (Department: 3723)
Abrading
Precision device or process - or with condition responsive...
With indicating
C451S288000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06283829
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND ART
Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is generally known in the art. For example U.S. Pat. No. 5,177,908 to Tuttle issued in 1993 describes a finishing element for semiconductor wafers, having a face shaped to provide a constant, or nearly constant, surface contact rate to a workpiece such as a semiconductor wafer in order to effect improved planarity of the workpiece. U.S. Pat. No. 5,234,867 to Schultz et. al. issued in 1993 describes an apparatus for planarizing semiconductor wafers which in a preferred form includes a rotatable platen for polishing a surface of the workpiece and a motor for rotating the platen and a non-circular pad is mounted atop the platen to engage and polish the surface of the semiconductor wafer. Fixed abrasive finishing elements are also known for polishing semiconductor layers. An example is WO 98/18159 PCT application by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing.
Semiconductor wafer fabrication generally requires the formation of layers of material having particularly small thickness. A typical conductor layer, such as a metal layer, is generally 2,000 to 6,000 angstroms thick and a typical insulating layer, for example a an oxide layer, is generally 3,000 to 5,000 angstroms thick. The actual thickness is at least partially dependent on the function of the layer along with the function and design of the semiconductor wafer. A gate oxide layer can be less than 100 angstroms while a field oxide is in the thousands of angstroms in thickness. In higher density and higher value semiconductor wafers the layers can be below 500 angstroms in thickness. Generally during semiconductor fabrication, layers thicker than necessary are formed and then thinned down to the required tolerances with techniques needed such as Chemical Mechanical Polishing. Because of the strict tolerances, extreme care is given to attaining the required thinned down tolerances. As such, it is important to accurately determine just when enough of the layer has been removed to reach the required tolerances, this is the end point for the thinning or polishing operation. One method to remove selected amounts of material is to remove the semiconductor wafer periodically from polishing for measurements such as thickness layer measurements. Although this can be done it is time consuming and adds extra expense to the operation. Further the expensive wafers can be damaged during transfer to or from the measurement process further decreasing process yields and increasing costs.
Confidential applicant evaluations also suggest that lubricants supplied to the interface between the workpiece surface being finished and the polishing pad polishing surface can improve finishing. Addition of lubricants to the interface between the workpiece surface being finished and the polishing pad polishing surface can improve finishing but also changes the friction at this interface. In situ process control where lubricants are added or changed during the finishing process can change finishing performance. A method to detect in process changes due to lubricant additions is needed in the industry.
As discussed above, there is a need for a in situ detector for CMP and other finishing techniques which will function with or without the addition lubrication to the finishing interface. There is a need for an in situ detector and control of CMP and other finishing control parameters which account for and adjust for the addition and/or control of lubrication at the finishing interface. There is a need for an in situ detector and control of CMP and other finishing control parameters which detect the endpoint and/or/stop the CMP and/or other finishing processes.
It is an advantage of this invention to develop an in situ friction sensor subsystem and finishing sensor subsystem for CMP and other finishing techniques and methods which function with or without the addition lubrication to the finishing interface. It is an advantage of this invention to develop an in situ friction sensor subsystem and finishing sensor subsystem for control of CMP and other finishing control parameters which account for and adjust for the addition and/or control of lubrication at the finishing interface. It is an advantage of this invention to develop an in situ friction sensor subsystem and finishing sensor subsystem CMP and other finishing control parameters which detect the endpoint and stop the CMP and/or other finishing processes.
These and other advantages of the invention will become readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art after reading the following disclosure of the invention.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5036015 (1991-07-01), Sandhu et al.
patent: 5352277 (1994-10-01), Sasaki
patent: 5597442 (1997-01-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5759917 (1998-06-01), Grover et al.
patent: 5860847 (1999-01-01), Sakurai et al.
patent: 5876470 (1999-03-01), Ronay
patent: 5954977 (1999-09-01), Kaufman et al.
patent: 5993298 (1999-11-01), Duescher
patent: 6046111 (2000-04-01), Robinson
patent: WO 98/08919 (1998-03-01), None
patent: WO 99/64527 (1999-12-01), None
patent: WO 00/00561 (2000-01-01), None
patent: WO 00/00576 (2000-01-01), None
Beaver Creek Concepts Inc
Rose Robert A.
LandOfFree
In situ friction detector method for finishing semiconductor... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with In situ friction detector method for finishing semiconductor..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and In situ friction detector method for finishing semiconductor... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2484339