Paper making and fiber liberation – Processes and products – Running or indefinite length work forming and/or treating...
Reexamination Certificate
1999-07-13
2001-07-24
Silverman, Stanley S. (Department: 1731)
Paper making and fiber liberation
Processes and products
Running or indefinite length work forming and/or treating...
C162S343000, C162S336000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06264796
ABSTRACT:
The present invention is directed to a diffuser section for a paper making headbox, and more particularly, to a diffuser system for a paper making headbox which minimizes the wall areas adjacent the inlets of the diffuser system to reduce streaking in the finished paper product.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the paper making industry, paper is ultimately formed from a mixture of fibers suspended in a solution of primarily water. Once the fibrous slurry is produced, it is fed to a headbox including a distribution system, a turbulence generating section, and a nozzle. Flow entering the headbox first enters the distribution system. The distribution system is typically utilized to normalize the properties of the slurry, such as the consistency, pressure, and velocity. Flow exiting the distribution system enters into the turbulence generating section, which is termed a diffuser section in hydraulic headboxes. The turbulence generating section delivers flow to a nozzle. The slurry then flows through the nozzle and is deposited in jet form onto a conveyer or wire. The slurry is then dried and treated to form the finished product.
It is important the slurry be sufficiently agitated while it is transported through the diffuser system and nozzle because the agitation keeps the fibers generally uniformly suspended throughout the fluid, and maintains random fiber orientation. If the fibers are not generally uniformly distributed (i.e., if areas of higher concentration exist), and are not randomly oriented (i.e., if some of the fibers are aligned) the resultant product may have “streaks,” which are areas of structural variation in the paper. Streaks are manifested in paper sheets that are distorted such that the paper sheet does not lie flat.
FIG. 1
illustrates a typical prior art diffuser section wherein the slurry flow, or pulp flow is fed from the distribution system
64
to the diffuser section
50
. The diffuser section
50
is comprised of a series of parallel, bundled tubes
52
that are anchored in an inlet wall
54
. The incoming pulp flow
56
impinges upon the inlet wall
54
and ultimately enters the diffuser pipes
52
at an inlet
58
. The flow through each of the diffuser tubes
52
is exhausted into a nozzle area (not shown). In order to maintain the agitation of the pulp, the walls of the tubes
52
typically diverge in the downstream direction (not shown) to create an adverse pressure gradient (i.e. a pressure gradient that decreases in the downstream direction). The pressure drop created at each tube inlet
58
, in combination with the adverse pressure gradient, introduces small-scale turbulence which maintains fiber suspension in the slurry, and helps to randomize the fiber orientation and distribution. The diffuser section thereby agitates the fluid through “controlled turbulence”.
As noted above, the tubes
52
are fit into holes formed in an inlet wall
54
. The solid portions
60
of the wall are flow stagnation areas, and the tube inlets
58
are flow sinks. The distribution system
64
supplies the pulp flow
56
and is thus a flow source. A model for describing the arrangement of vortices in a two dimensional flow, known at the vonKarman vortex street, predicts that the symmetric positioning of stagnations (
60
) and sinks (
58
) in the presence of a source (
56
) introduces a series of oscillating vortices. Applicant has extended this concept to three dimensions, and applied the concept to headboxes. Applicant has discovered that vortices in the diffuser tubes may be created by dead spots
60
on the diffuser section wall
54
. The vortices may then travel down each diffuser section tube
52
either in succession, or in a set pattern. When the vortices exit the diffuser tubes (indicated at
62
), the exiting vortices create secondary flows, which are flows in a circular direction that causes the fibers to align and/or concentrate. The secondary flows align the fibers in the pulp, and repeated secondary flows cause the aligned fibers to appear as “streaks” in the finished paper products. As noted earlier, streaks are areas of structural variation in the paper believed to be caused by aligned of fibers. Streaks may cause mechanical condition defects in the papers, which can result in paper that will not lie flat (i.e., warped or buckled paper). Therefore, it appears that the presence of streaks may be attributed to the vortices
62
, that in turn may be attributed to stagnation points
60
on the diffuser wall
54
.
There have been prior art attempts to reduce or eliminate the effects of secondary flows. However, most of these efforts focus upon minimizing the effect of secondary flows, and have not addressed the source of secondary flows. Accordingly, there exists a need for a diffuser section which can minimize stagnation areas on the inlet wall and thereby minimize vortices that cause secondary flows and streaking in the finished paper.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a diffuser section which effectively reduces or eliminates the inlet stagnation wall area and thereby minimizes the formation of vortices and secondary flows. The invention utilizes diffuser tubes having inlets that may interfit together, thereby effectively eliminating the inlet wall. More particularly, the present invention is a diffuser section for use in a headbox, the diffuser section comprising a plurality of hollow diffusers, each diffuser having an outlet and an inlet that is shaped as a polygon. The plurality of diffusers are arranged such that the inlet of each the diffuser abuts against an adjacent diffuser inlet such that there are generally no gaps therebetween to minimize stagnation points.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawings and the appended claims.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3272233 (1966-09-01), Trufitt
patent: 3328236 (1967-06-01), Burgess, Jr. et al.
patent: 3400044 (1968-09-01), Justus
patent: 3486972 (1969-12-01), Nagell
patent: 3627039 (1971-12-01), Tiefenbacher
patent: 3725197 (1973-04-01), Dahl et al.
patent: 3770580 (1973-11-01), Kallmes et al.
patent: 3856619 (1974-12-01), Davidson et al.
patent: 3977938 (1976-08-01), Descary et al.
patent: 4206806 (1980-06-01), Togashi
patent: 4897160 (1990-01-01), Wolf et al.
patent: 5019215 (1991-05-01), Fortier et al.
patent: 5183537 (1993-02-01), Hergert et al.
patent: 5510005 (1996-04-01), Gingerich
patent: 5626722 (1997-05-01), Huovila
patent: 5741401 (1998-04-01), Heinzmann
Silverman Stanley S.
The Mead Corporation
Thompson Hine & Flory LLP
Walls Dionne A.
LandOfFree
Headbox diffuser does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Headbox diffuser, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Headbox diffuser will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2446930