Etching a substrate: processes – Nongaseous phase etching of substrate – With measuring – testing – or inspecting
Reexamination Certificate
1998-05-06
2001-05-08
Mills, Gregory (Department: 1763)
Etching a substrate: processes
Nongaseous phase etching of substrate
With measuring, testing, or inspecting
C216S090000, C438S692000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06228280
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention is directed to semiconductor processing and more particularly to the detection of the endpoint for removal of one film overlying another film.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the semiconductor industry, critical steps in the production of integrated circuits are the selective formation and removal of films on an underlying substrate. The films are made from a variety of substances, and can be conductive (for example metal or a magnetic ferrous conductive material) or non-conductive (for example an insulator). Conductive films are typically used for wiring or wiring connections. Non-conductive or dielectric films are used in several areas, for example as interlevel dielectrics between layers of metallization, or as isolations between adjacent circuit elements.
Typical processing steps involve: (1) depositing a film, (2) patterning areas of the film using lithography and etching, (3) depositing a film which fills the etched areas, and (4) planarizing the structure by etching or chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP). Films are formed on a substrate by a variety of well-known methods, for example physical vapor deposition (PVD) by sputtering or evaporation, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). Films are removed by any of several well-known methods, for example chemical-mechanical polishing (also known as CMP), dry etching such as reactive ion etching (RIE), wet etching, electrochemical etching, vapor etching, and spray etching.
It is extremely important with removal of films to stop the process when the correct thickness has been removed (the endpoint has been reached). With CMP, a film is selectively removed from a semiconductor wafer by rotating the wafer against a polishing pad (or rotating the pad against the wafer, or both) with a controlled amount of pressure in the presence of a slurry. Overpolishing (removing too much) of a film results in yield loss, and underpolishing (removing too little) requires costly rework (redoing the CMP process). Various methods have been employed to detect when the desired endpoint for removal has been reached, and the polishing should be stopped.
The prior art methods for CMP endpoint detection suitable for all types of films involve the following types of measurement: (1) simple timing, (2) friction by motor current, (3) capacitive, (4) optical, (5) acoustical, and (6) conductive.
An exception to the above is U.S. Pat. No. 5,399,234 to Yu et al, in which a chemical reaction is described between potassium hydroxide in the polishing slurry and the layer being polished. The endpoint for polishing is monitored by sending acoustic waves through the slurry and detecting changes in the acoustic velocity as the concentration of reaction product (thought to be silanol in the case of polishing silicon dioxide) from the layer being polished decreases upon reaching an underlying polish stop layer.
These prior art methods each have inherent disadvantages such as inability for real-time monitoring, the need to remove the wafer from the process apparatus for examining the completion of polishing (not in-situ), or a lack of sensitivity.
These disadvantages have been overcome with an in-situ endpoint detection scheme for conductive films as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,559,428 to Li et al titled “In-Situ Monitoring of the Change in Thickness of Films,” however a suitable endpoint detection for non-conductive films has yet to be described.
Thus, there remains a need for an in-situ, real-time endpoint detection scheme suitable for use with all types of films. Such a scheme should have high detection sensitivity and extremely fast response time, preferably less than 1 or 2 seconds.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for detecting the endpoint for removal of any type of film overlying another film.
Another object of the present invention is to provide for in-situ endpoint detection as the film is being removed.
Yet another object is to provide endpoint detection with high detection sensitivity and extremely fast response time.
In accordance with the above listed and other objects, a method for detecting the endpoint for removal of a target film overlying a stopping film by chemical-mechanical polishing using a slurry, by (a) removing the target film with a process that generates a chemical reaction product in the slurry, (b) adding to the slurry a reagent which produces a characteristic result upon reacting with the chemical reaction product, and (c) monitoring the slurry for the characteristic result as the target film is removed is described.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3503711 (1970-03-01), Skala
patent: 3904371 (1975-09-01), Neti et al.
patent: 4493745 (1985-01-01), Chen et al.
patent: 4512964 (1985-04-01), Vayenas
patent: 4812416 (1989-03-01), Hewig et al.
patent: 4819478 (1989-04-01), Melcher
patent: 4961834 (1990-10-01), Kuhn et al.
patent: 4975141 (1990-12-01), Greco et al.
patent: 5234567 (1993-08-01), Hobbs et al.
patent: 5242532 (1993-09-01), Cain
patent: 5242882 (1993-09-01), Campbell
patent: 5256387 (1993-10-01), Campbell
patent: 5395589 (1995-03-01), Nacson
patent: 5399234 (1995-03-01), Yu et al.
patent: 5405488 (1995-04-01), Dimitrelis et al.
patent: 5439551 (1995-08-01), Meikle et al.
patent: 5559428 (1996-09-01), Li et al.
patent: 5770095 (1998-06-01), Sasaki et al.
patent: 6066564 (2000-05-01), Li et al.
patent: 3277947 (1991-12-01), None
Park, et al, “Real Time Monitoring of NH, Concentration Using Diffusion Scrubber Sampling Technique and Result of Application to the Processing of Chemiacally Amplified Resists”, JPN. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 34 (1995) pp. 6770-6773 Part I No. 12B, Dec., 1995.
Carr, et al, Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “End-Point Detection of Chemical/Mechanical Polishing of Circuitized Multilayer Substrates”, YO887-0456, vol. 34 No. 4B, Sep. 1991 p. 406-407.
Carr, et al, Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “End Point Detection of Chemical/Mechanical Polishing of Thin Film Structures”, YO886-0830, vol. 34 No. 4A, Sep. 1991, p. 198-200.
Rutten, Research Disclosure Endpoint Detection Method for Ion Etching of Material Having a Titanium Nitride Underlayer, BU890-0132, Feb. 1991, No. 322, Kenneth Mason Publications Ltd, England.
Biolsi, et al, “An Advanced Endpoint Detection Solution for <1% Open Areas”, Solid State Technology, Dec. 1996, p. 59-67.
Economou, et al, “In Situ Monitoring of Etching Uniformity in Plasma Reactors”, Solid State Technology, Apr., 1991, p. 107-111.
Roland, et al, “Endpoint Detecting in Plasma Etching”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A3(3), May/Jun. 1985, p. 631-636.
Gilhooly James Albert
Li Leping
Morgan, III Clifford Owen
Wei Cong
Anderson Jay H.
International Business Machines - Corporation
Mills Gregory
Mortinger Alison D.
Powell Alva C
LandOfFree
Endpoint detection by chemical reaction and reagent does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Endpoint detection by chemical reaction and reagent, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Endpoint detection by chemical reaction and reagent will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2492918