Electronic digital logic circuitry – Function of and – or – nand – nor – or not – Field-effect transistor
Reexamination Certificate
1999-07-07
2001-02-06
Nguyen, Tan T. (Department: 2819)
Electronic digital logic circuitry
Function of and, or, nand, nor, or not
Field-effect transistor
C326S098000, C326S095000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06184718
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to electronic circuits and, more particularly, relates to implementing logic functions using a high-speed dynamic logic circuit.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Dynamic circuits have achieved widespread use because they require less silicon area and have superior performance over conventional static circuits. Unlike static circuits, dynamic circuits store data in the form of charge that dissipates in a short period of time due to leakage current. Consequently, dynamic circuits must periodically refresh the charge in order to properly retain data. A well-known dynamic circuit is a dynamic random access memory (DRAM) that stores data on charged capacitors.
Dynamic circuits can also be used to implement logic functions. An example of a dynamic logic circuit is shown in
FIG. 1A
, where a four-input logic function is implemented. A circuit
100
includes a precharge transistor
112
tied to power (Vdd), an evaluation transistor
114
tied to ground and a logic block
116
(shown in dashed lines) coupled between the precharge and evaluation transistors. Logic block
116
has a group of three input transistors
118
,
120
,
121
coupled in series and one input transistor
122
coupled in parallel across the other input transistors. A clock signal path
123
is coupled to the precharge and evaluation transistors.
FIG. 1B
shows a waveform of a clock signal on the path
123
. The signal has precharge And evaluation portions in its clock cycle which correspond to precharge and evaluation phases of the circuit. During the precharge phase, transistor
112
is activated (operating in saturation), charging a precharge node
124
and the logic block
116
to a logic high voltage level. Conversely, transistor
114
is inactive (substantially turned off) during the precharge phase. With precharge node
124
at a high voltage level, a primary output
126
is at a logic low voltage level because inverting buffer
128
inverts the output of node
124
.
During the evaluation phase, the evaluation transistor
114
is active and the precharge transistor is inactive. If each serially coupled input transistor
118
,
120
,
121
in logic block
116
is activated or if input transistor
122
is activated, then the logic block is said to be “conducting” (substantially a short circuit), and the evaluation transistor pulls the precharge node
124
and the logic block
116
low. Otherwise, the precharge node and the logic block remain at their precharged level.
Each transistor in the logic block has an associated capacitance (not shown). The precharge transistor
112
must be large enough to charge all of the transistors in the logic block
16
during the precharge phase. If the precharge transistor is too small, the capacitance of the transistors in the logic block may absorb enough charge to prevent the voltage on node
124
from rising to a high voltage level.
The more sophisticated the circuit, the more input transistors are needed in the logic block, and the larger the precharge transistor must be in order to overcome the capacitance of the logic block. Increasing the size of the precharge transistor increases the area and power used by the circuit. Moreover, increasing capacitance of the logic block increases the propagation delay (i.e., slows the speed) of the circuit. The speed of the circuit is determined by how fast the evaluation transistor can remove charge from the precharged logic block and the precharge node. The more inputs in the logic block, the greater the charge that the evaluation transistor must remove, and, hence the slower the circuit. Thus, power, area and speed are all related to the number of inputs to the circuit. The greater the number of inputs, the greater the amount of power needed to run the circuit, the greater the area the circuit uses, and the greater the circuit's propagation delay.
Using the circuit of
FIG. 1
, designers must weigh the advantages of including new features into a circuit against the increase in power, area and propagation delay as a result of the new features.
It is, therefore, desirable to have a circuit that has constant power and propagation delay regardless of the number of inputs to the dynamic logic block.
FIG. 2
shows a known dynamic logic circuit that attempts to overcome the problems of the
FIG. 1
circuit. A precharge transistor
200
is isolated from a logic block
202
by an evaluation transistor
204
. Each transistor T
0
-T
4
in the logic block
202
has an associated capacitance that is represented by capacitors C
0
-C
4
. A precharge node
206
also has capacitance associated with it as represented by a capacitor C
5
. Unlike
FIG. 1
, the precharge transistor
200
does not charge the logic block
202
to an appropriate high voltage level during the precharge phase. Instead, the evaluation transistor
204
is off during the precharge phase, isolating the precharge transistor from the logic block. The precharge transistor of
FIG. 2
may be smaller, consequently, than the precharge transistor in the circuit of
FIG. 1
, thereby saving power and area.
Nonetheless, the circuit of
FIG. 2
is generally considered a poor design because charge-sharing between the logic block and the precharge node during the evaluation phase can cause the precharge node to undesirably go low. See
Principles of CMOS VLSI Design: A System Perspective
, 2nd Edition, by Neil Weste and Kamran Eshraghian, FIG. 5.37(
a
). For example, assume the inputs I
1
-I
4
are high (transistors T
1
-T
4
are active), while input I
0
is low (transistor T
0
is inactive). When the evaluation phase begins, all of the charge associated with capacitor C
5
(stored during the precharge phase) is shared with capacitors C
1
-C
4
because the elevation transistor allows current to flow therebetween. Given the inputs, the output is supposed to be a logic low (since T
0
is inactive). Instead, the capacitors C
1
-C
4
absorb enough charge from capacitor C
5
that the circuit output erroneously goes high. The larger the number of inputs, the more charge-sharing that occurs and the more likely the circuit will improperly operate.
An objective of the invention, therefore, is to provide an improved dynamic logic circuit that overcomes the deficiencies of the prior art.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a dynamic logic circuit that has increased speed and reduced power. Moreover, particularly for cells with higher drive capacity, the power and speed of the circuit are substantially constant, for a wide range of inputs the circuit contains. The circuit also allows for a precharge transistor that is a substantially constant size, regardless of the number of inputs.
In one embodiment, a dynamic logic circuit includes a precharge transistor for precharging a precharge node of the circuit to a predetermined voltage level, such as a logic high or a logic low. A logic block contains one or more input transistors that receive input signals to the dynamic logic circuit. An evaluation transistor is positioned between the logic block and the precharge transistor and electrically uncouples the logic block from the precharge node during a precharge phase so that the precharge node is unaffected by the capacitance of the logic block. A delay is coupled to the precharge transistor and ensures that the precharge transistor is activated for at least a portion of an evaluation phase to charge the logic block. Thus, charge-sharing between the precharge node and the dynamic logic block is overcome by an influx of additional charge at the start of the evaluation phase.
The delay can be accomplished a number of ways, including transmission line delays or RC delays. The delay can also be a buffer, such as a pair of inverters.
In another aspect of the invention, an anti-float device, such as a latch, is used to prevent the output node from floating or otherwise losing the current state of the circuit.
In yet another aspect of the invention, the dynamic logic circuit may provide a buffered clock signal used to drive subsequent sta
Acuff Mark Warren
Tran Dzung Joseph
Klarquist Sparkman Campbell Leigh & Whinston, LLP.
Nguyen Tan T.
Translogic Technology, Inc.
LandOfFree
Dynamic logic circuit does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Dynamic logic circuit, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dynamic logic circuit will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2579140