Customizable instant messaging private tags

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: support – Multiple computer communication using cryptography – Particular communication authentication technique

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C713S168000, C713S150000, C713S193000, C380S261000, C380S274000, C380S286000, C709S206000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07945783

ABSTRACT:
Systems for customizing the privatizing of instant messages preferably comprise a processing device configured to detect a marking of select portions of an instant message as sensitive data. The instant message is parsed for marked sensitive data. An encryption engine encrypts the sensitive data. A modified unencoder is also preferably included for converting the encrypted sensitive data into a data stream that complies with an XML format. Other systems and methods are also provided.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5872521 (1999-02-01), Lopatukin et al.
patent: 6941459 (2005-09-01), Hind et al.
patent: 6990513 (2006-01-01), Belfiore et al.
patent: 7315867 (2008-01-01), Kobayashi et al.
patent: 7464268 (2008-12-01), Kent, Jr. et al.
patent: 7546465 (2009-06-01), Kent, Jr. et al.
patent: 2002/0016718 (2002-02-01), Rothschild et al.
patent: 2002/0038289 (2002-03-01), Lawlor et al.
patent: 2003/0046273 (2003-03-01), Deshpande
Kent; Non-Final Rejection mailed Apr. 19, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,099, filed Feb. 18, 2003.
Kent; Non-Final Rejection mailed Oct. 11, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,099, filed Feb. 18, 2003.
Kent; Non-Final Rejection mailed Oct. 30, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,099, filed Feb. 18, 2003.
Kent; Non-Final Rejection mailed May 23, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,197, filed Feb. 18, 2003.
Kent; Advisory Action mailed Jun. 7, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,197, filed Feb. 18, 2003.
Kent; Final Rejection mailed Mar. 9, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,197, filed Feb. 18, 2003.
Kent; Non-Final Rejection mailed Sep. 20, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,197, filed Feb. 18, 2003.
Kent; Non-Final Rejection mailed Oct. 10, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,197, filed Feb. 18, 2003.
Andre; “XMPP Instant Messaging”, Jabber Software Foundation, Jun. 4, 2003, pp. 1-88.
Sugano; “Common Presence and Instant Messaging (CPIM) Presence Information Data Format”, May 2002, pp. 1-23.
Day; A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging; Feb. 2000; pp. 1-17.
Hamner; “Email as a tool for Sharing binary files Among Scientists”, J. Chem. Inf. Computer. Sci.,Jul. 2, 1993, 5 pages, vol. 34, Blacksburg, VA.
M. Day, et al.; Instant Messaging / Presence Protocol Requirements; Feb. 2000; pp. 1-26.
Neuman; Kerberos: An Authentication Service for Computer Networks, 1994, IEEE, vol. 32, pp. 33-38.
Portman; “Selective Security for TLS”, School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, Sydney, Australia, 2001. 6 pages.
Trillian; Features Tour, Messaging Enhancements, Connect to 5 Mediums, Interface Overview, Trillian-Pro Features Tour, Gallery-Contact List, Sending Pictures, Message Windows, Apr. 23, 2003, pp. 1-9.
W3C; Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition—W3C Recommendation; Oct. 6, 2000; pp. 1-59.
Kent; Non-Final Rejection mailed Apr. 7, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,099, filed Feb. 18, 2003.
Kent; Notice of Allowance and Fees Due mailed Sep. 19, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,197, filed Feb. 18, 2003.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Customizable instant messaging private tags does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Customizable instant messaging private tags, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Customizable instant messaging private tags will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2634006

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.