Electronic digital logic circuitry – Multifunctional or programmable – Significant integrated structure – layout – or layout...
Reexamination Certificate
2006-12-05
2006-12-05
Barnie, Rexford (Department: 2819)
Electronic digital logic circuitry
Multifunctional or programmable
Significant integrated structure, layout, or layout...
C326S037000, C326S038000, C326S039000, C326S040000, C326S041000, C326S047000, C326S101000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07145361
ABSTRACT:
Some embodiments provide an IC with a configurable node array that has (1) two similar nodes within the interior of the array, and (2) two different connection schemes. The first connection scheme specifies a set of connections between the first node and a set of nodes in the array, while the second connection scheme specifies a second set of connections between the second node and a set of nodes in the array. The two nodes cannot connect to any nodes on the boundary of the array with any connection that is specified in any connection scheme.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4873459 (1989-10-01), El Gamal et al.
patent: 5349250 (1994-09-01), New
patent: 5357153 (1994-10-01), Chiang et al.
patent: 5365125 (1994-11-01), Goetting et al.
patent: 5521835 (1996-05-01), Trimberger
patent: 5552721 (1996-09-01), Gould
patent: 5610829 (1997-03-01), Trimberger
patent: 5631578 (1997-05-01), Clinton et al.
patent: 5646544 (1997-07-01), Iadanza
patent: 5659484 (1997-08-01), Bennett et al.
patent: 5692147 (1997-11-01), Larsen et al.
patent: 5694057 (1997-12-01), Gould
patent: 5719889 (1998-02-01), Iadanza
patent: 5732246 (1998-03-01), Gould et al.
patent: 5737235 (1998-04-01), Kean et al.
patent: 5745422 (1998-04-01), Iadanza
patent: 5745734 (1998-04-01), Craft et al.
patent: 5764954 (1998-06-01), Fuller et al.
patent: 5777360 (1998-07-01), Rostoker et al.
patent: 5802003 (1998-09-01), Iadanza et al.
patent: 5815726 (1998-09-01), Cliff
patent: 5889411 (1999-03-01), Chaudhary
patent: 5914616 (1999-06-01), Young et al.
patent: 5914906 (1999-06-01), Iadanza et al.
patent: 6002991 (1999-12-01), Conn, Jr.
patent: 6023421 (2000-02-01), Clinton et al.
patent: 6038192 (2000-03-01), Clinton et al.
patent: 6044031 (2000-03-01), Iadanza et al.
patent: 6054873 (2000-04-01), Laramie
patent: 6069490 (2000-05-01), Ochotta et al.
patent: 6075745 (2000-06-01), Gould et al.
patent: 6086631 (2000-07-01), Chaudhary et al.
patent: 6091263 (2000-07-01), New et al.
patent: 6091645 (2000-07-01), Iadanza
patent: 6107821 (2000-08-01), Kelem et al.
patent: 6110223 (2000-08-01), Southgate et al.
patent: 6118707 (2000-09-01), Gould et al.
patent: 6130854 (2000-10-01), Gould et al.
patent: 6140839 (2000-10-01), Kaviani et al.
patent: 6150838 (2000-11-01), Wittig et al.
patent: 6175247 (2001-01-01), Scalera et al.
patent: 6184707 (2001-02-01), Norman et al.
patent: 6233191 (2001-05-01), Gould et al.
patent: 6292019 (2001-09-01), New et al.
patent: 6326651 (2001-12-01), Manabe
patent: 6381732 (2002-04-01), Burnham et al.
patent: 6487709 (2002-11-01), Keller et al.
patent: 6490707 (2002-12-01), Baxter
patent: 6515509 (2003-02-01), Baxter
patent: 6526559 (2003-02-01), Schiefele et al.
patent: 6529040 (2003-03-01), Carberry et al.
patent: 6545501 (2003-04-01), Bailis et al.
patent: 6593771 (2003-07-01), Bailis et al.
patent: 6601227 (2003-07-01), Trimberger
patent: 6603330 (2003-08-01), Snyder
patent: 6629308 (2003-09-01), Baxter
patent: 6636070 (2003-10-01), Altaf
patent: 6642744 (2003-11-01), Or-Bach et al.
patent: 6667635 (2003-12-01), Pi et al.
patent: 6668361 (2003-12-01), Bailis et al.
patent: 6675309 (2004-01-01), Baxter
patent: 6714041 (2004-03-01), Darling et al.
patent: 6806730 (2004-10-01), Bailis et al.
patent: 6831479 (2004-12-01), Lo
patent: 6838902 (2005-01-01), Elftmann et al.
patent: 6992505 (2006-01-01), Zhou
patent: 2002/0008541 (2002-01-01), Young et al.
patent: 2002/0125914 (2002-09-01), Kim
patent: 2002/0163357 (2002-11-01), Ting
patent: 2003/0042931 (2003-03-01), Ting
patent: 2003/0080777 (2003-05-01), Baxter
patent: 2003/0110430 (2003-06-01), Bailis et al.
patent: 2004/0196066 (2004-10-01), Ting
U.S. Appl. No. 10/882,713, filed Jun. 30, 2004, Rohe.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/882,945, filed Jun. 30, 2004, Rohe.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/883,502, filed Jun. 30, 2004, Rohe.
“§3 Programmable Logic Devices,”Digital System Design, 2001, pp. 3.1-3.28, month n/a.
“Design for Low Power in Actel Antifuse FPGAs”, Actel Application Note, 2000 Actel Corporation, Sep. 2000, pp. 1-8.
“The Effect of SRAM Table Sharing and Cluster Size on FPGA Area”, pp. 1-10, date n/a.
“The Xilinx Virtex Series FPGA,” Jan. 22, 2001, slides 1-22.
“Unifying Sequential and Spatial Computing with a Single Instruction Set Architecture,”ISCA '04, 2004, ACM, Munchen, Oberbayern, Germany, month n/a.
Agrawal, O., et al., “An Innovative, Segmented High Performance FPGA Family with Variable-Grain-Architecture and Wide-gating Functions,”FPGA 99, 1999, pp. 17-26, ACM, Monterey, CA, USA, no month.
Ahmed, E., et al., “The Effect of LUT and Cluster Size on Deep-Submicron FPGA Performance and Density,”FPGA 2000, 2000, ACM, Monterey, CA, USA, no month.
Altera Corp., “6. DSP Blocks in Stratix II Devices,”SII52006-1.0, Feb. 2004, pp. 1-32.
Altera, “Stratic II DSP Performance,”White Paper, Feb. 2004, pp. 1-9, ver. 1.0, Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA.
Backus, J., “Can Programming be Liberated from the Von Neumann Style? A Functional Style and its Algebra of Programs,”Communications of the ACM, Aug. 1978, pp. 613-641, vol. 21, No. 8, ACM.
Barker, R., “QuickSilver ACM SilverStream Design Methodology with the Inspire SDK Tool Set,”A Technology Application Whitepaper, 2004, pp. 1-8, QuickSilver Technology, Inc., San Jose, California, month n/a.
Butts, M., “Future Directions of Dynamically Reprogrammable Systems,”IEEE 1995 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1995, pp. 487-494, IEEE, month n/a.
Camposano, R., “The Growing Semiconductor Zoo: ASICs, CSSP, ASSP, ASIP, Structured Arrays, FPGAs, Processor Arrays, Platforms . . . and Other Animalia,” 2003, pp. 1-74, Synopsys, Inc., no month.
Caspi, E., et al., “A Streaming Multi-Threaded Model,”MSP-3, Dec. 2, 2001, pp. 1-23.
Caspi, E., et al., “Stream Computations Organized for Reconfigurable Executiion (SCORE): Introduction and Tutorial,” Aug. 25, 2000, pp. 1-31, Version 1.0.
Compton, K. et al., “An Introduction to Reconfigurable Computing,” date n/a.
Compton, K. et al., “Reconfigurable Computing: A Survey of Systems and Software,”ACM Computing Surveys, Jun. 2002, pp. 171-210, vol. 34, No. 2, ACM, New York, NY.
Cong, J., et al., “Combinational Logic Synthesis for LUT Based Field Programmable Gate Arrays,”ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems, Apr. 1996, pp. 145-204, vol. 1, No. 2, ACM, Inc.
Davare, A., et al., “The Best of Both Worlds: The Efficient Asynchronous Implementation of Synchronous Specifications,”DAC '04, Jun. 7-11, 2004, ACM, San Diego, California, USA.
Dehon, A., Balancing Interconnect and Computation in a Reconfigurable Computing Array (or, why don't you really want 100% LUT utilization). pp. 1-10. (Applications believe that this article also appears inProceedings of the International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays, Feb. 1999, pp. 125-134.)
Dehon, A., “DPGA Utilization and Application.” Feb. 11-13, 1996.
Dehon, A., “Dynamically Programmable Gate Arrays: A Step Toward Increased Computational Density,”Proceedings of the Fourth Canadian Workshop on Field-Programmable Devices, May 1996, pp. 47-54.
Dehon, A., “Reconfigurable Architectures for General-Purpose Computing,”A.I. Technical Report No. 1586, Oct. 1996, pp. i-353.
Dehon, A., “The Density Advantage of Configurable Computing,” Apr. 2000, pp. 41-49, IEEE.
Dehon, A., “Transit Note #121: Notes on Programmable Interconnect,”M.I.T. Transit Project, Feb. 1995, pp. 1-13.
Dehon, A., et al., “Design Patterns for Reconfigurable Computing,”Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines, Apr. 2004.
Dehon, A., et al., “DPGA-Coupled Microprocessors: Commodity ICs for the Early 21stCentury,”FCCM '94-IEEE Workshop on FPGAs for Custom Computing Machines, Apr. 10-13, 1994.
Dehon, A., et al., “Reconfigurable Computing: What, Why and Implications for Design
Rohe Andre
Teig Steven
Barnie Rexford
Stattler Johansen & Adeli LLP
White Dylan
LandOfFree
Configurable integrated circuit with different connection... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Configurable integrated circuit with different connection..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Configurable integrated circuit with different connection... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3720085