Electrical computers and digital processing systems: support – Computer power control – Having power source monitoring
Reexamination Certificate
2001-01-24
2004-08-03
Lee, Thomas (Department: 2115)
Electrical computers and digital processing systems: support
Computer power control
Having power source monitoring
C307S140000, C702S059000, C714S036000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06772357
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
This disclosure relates generally to fault-detection and fault-isolation techniques for electronic equipment and, more particularly, to a technique for detecting and isolating faults or defects related to the operation of a power supply in a personal computer system.
Computer systems in general and personal computer systems in particular have attained widespread use within many segments of today's society, and may be viewed as information handling systems that afford independent computing power to one user or to a plurality of users. A personal computer system can conveniently be classified as a desktop, floor standing, or portable microcomputer.
A personal computer system will likely include one or a plurality of peripheral devices that are coupled to the system processor and that perform specialized functions. Examples of peripheral devices include modems, sound and video devices or specialized communication devices. Mass storage devices such as hard disks, CD-ROM drives and magneto-optical drives are also considered peripheral devices.
FIG. 3
is a block diagram of an exemplary computer system
300
. The computer system depicted in
FIG. 3
is seen to include a microcomputer that includes a microprocessor (or simply “processor”)
310
, associated main memory
350
and control logic and a number of peripheral devices
330
,
387
,
391
that provide input and output for the system
300
. A typical computer system
300
includes a power supply
110
connected to a voltage regulator
315
providing power to the processor
310
. Peripheral devices shown in
FIG. 3
include keyboards
391
, graphics devices
330
, and traditional I/O devices
387
that often include display monitors, mouse-type input devices, floppy and hard disk drives, CD-ROM drives and printers.
The number and kinds of peripheral devices that are appended to personal computers continue to expand. For example, many computer systems also include network capability, terminal devices, modems, televisions, sound devices, voice recognition devices, electronic pen devices, and mass storage devices such as tape drives, CD-R drives or DVDs. The peripheral devices usually communicate with the processor over one or more buses
320
,
360
,
380
, with the buses communicating with each other through the use of one or more bridges
340
and
370
.
One skilled in the art will recognize that the foregoing components and devices are used as examples for sake of conceptual clarity and that various configuration modifications are common. For example, the processor
310
is used as an exemplar of any general processing unit, including but not limited to multiprocessor units; host bus
320
is used as an exemplar of any processing bus, including but not limited to multiprocessor buses; and host-to-PCI bridge
340
and PCI-to-ISA bridge
370
are used as exemplars of any type of bridge.
PC systems typically include a system board to interconnect system components and peripheral devices and include a power supply to provide specified DC output voltages to system components and peripherals. For example, the power supply in a desktop computer typically converts 110 volts AC to various DC voltages that are distributed to PC subsystems and peripherals. Typically, 3.3 VDC may be provided to a modem, 5.0 VDC to a hard drive, and 12.0 VDC to a CD-ROM drive.
FIG. 2
is a rendition, in block diagram form, of a conventional power supply system
200
, such as may readily be used with PC systems. Power supply
110
converts a nominal 110-volt AC input at terminals
220
and
221
to a plurality of DC voltage outputs at terminals
230
,
240
and
250
. Power supply
110
incorporates a self-test procedure that is initiated when a predetermined signal is applied to an input terminal
160
. In practice, the required signal may appear between terminal
160
and system ground (GND)
180
. In general, if the self-test procedure indicates that the power supply performance complies with predetermined criteria, an appropriate signal indicating such compliance is caused to appear at output terminal
150
.
Specifically, it is common that commercially available power supply systems undertake the self-test function during the PC start-up process. The self-test procedure is often initiated by applying a predetermined voltage to a Power Supply Enable (PS
E
) input, or the equivalent, on the power supply. In one embodiment, the necessary voltage may be, for example, a logic-level ZERO. Power supply self-test is largely defined by the operation of a fault detector in the power supply. For the purposes of this Description, it may be assumed that the fault detector measures each of the power supply output voltages to determine whether those voltages reside within respective specified predetermined ranges, ±5% being commonplace. If the observed output voltages comply with this specification, then the fault detector will issue an affirmation that no fault exists within the power supply. The affirmation may take the form of a logic-level ZERO at the output of the fault detector, but other prescribed outputs may be encountered. The output of the fault detector is routed from the power supply through a connector to the PC system board. This signal, which may be colloquially referred to as the PS Good (PS
G
) output of the power supply, is then used to drive an indicator, usually a light-emitting diode (LED). Power supplies that operate generally as described above are commercially available from Lite-On Electronics, Inc., Milpitas, Calif. (Model #PS-520-7D), and from Delta Electronics, Taipei, Taiwan (Model # NPS-200PB-73). Activation of the LED serves as an indication that the power supply is operating, as is the entire PC. Conversely, failure of the LED to light may justify an inference that the power supply, or some other aspect of the PC, is not operative.
However, failure of the LED indicator to light cannot be conclusively taken as confirmation that the power supply is itself defective. The ambiguity derives from an existing PC design in which the PS
E
input to the power supply is generally contingent on the combination of a number of inputs to logic circuitry that generates the PS
E
signal. Simply, a power-supply-enabling PS
E
input becomes available only when the PC ON/OFF control has been activated, and when selected other PC components, subsystems, or peripherals have been determined to be operating properly. Therefore, failure of the LED indicator to light may be taken to indicate a fault or defect, but does not serve to specifically localize the defect. This uncertainty is, of course, an impediment to a troubleshooting and repair process. Clearly, if a defect could be confidently isolated to the power supply, then a malfunctioning PC could be returned to operation simply be replacing a defective power supply. On the other hand, if the fault is not able to be localized to the power supply, the entire PC may need to be taken out of service for repair, perhaps for an unnecessarily extensive duration.
Accordingly, what is desired is a simple, expedient and effective mechanism for isolating faults in a PC. Specifically, the mechanism should confidently determine whether the cause of an inoperative PC resides within the PC power supply or may be found elsewhere. Currently, a user has no means to accurately determine when a power supply system has failed. An indicator associated with the self-test function may respond indiscriminately to the failure of a power supply or, alternatively, to the grounding of the system board due to unrelated causes. When a power supply system fails, the user (or a repair technician) must isolate each component from the circuit and connect each component to the indicator using a jumper or other connector. Only after a repair technician isolates and tests the power supply can the repair technician determine whether failure of the indicator to illuminate, or otherwise provide an affirmative indication, is due to a fault in the power supply or a fault in the system board.
Accordingly, aspects of th
Billick Stephen J.
Kazmi Ariff
Dell Products L.P.
Haynes and Boone LLP
Lee Thomas
Wang Albert
LandOfFree
Computer system testing by simulating a power supply enable... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Computer system testing by simulating a power supply enable..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Computer system testing by simulating a power supply enable... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3295561