Computer aided design apparatus for aiding design of a...

Computer-aided design and analysis of circuits and semiconductor – Nanotechnology related integrated circuit design

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C716S030000, C716S030000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06631509

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a CAD (Computer Aided Design) apparatus for aiding design of a printed wiring board, and in particular to placing components to effectively reduce noise, and confirmation of the placement of the components.
(2) Description of the Related Art
In the design of wiring of printed wiring boards, it is imperative to take measures to suppress noise during operation. In particular, electronic circuits that operate with high frequency are prone to generate noise and it is important to take sufficient measures. Conventionally one measure against noise during operation is in the manner of placement of bypass capacitors on the board.
In particular, in printed wiring boards with high frequency signal wires, absorption of high frequency power ripple that happens at the rising edge of a high frequency signal, in other words supply of high frequency current to an IC, is mainly performed by a capacitor. Therefore, in order to reduce electromagnetic noise and improve quality of wiring boards, it is desirable to place the capacitor as close as possible to the IC power pin. This kind of technique is described in “Printed Circuit Board Techniques for EMI Compliance”, Mark I Montrose, IEEE Order No. PC5595 and “HIGH-SPEED DIGITAL DESIGN A Handbook of Black Magic”, Howard W. Johnson and Martin Graham, PTR Prentice-Hall.
Furthermore, conventionally in wiring board placement/wiring CAD, small components such as capacitors, coils (inductors), resistors, filters etc are assigned to large components such as ICs and connectors according to conventional component types or the state of net connection The components are placed by treating these sets of mutual components as one component, reducing the number of components to be considered on the wiring board overall. This kind of technique is described in “A Method of Suppressing EMI from Printed Circuit Boards by Automatic Placement, Based on Limited Length of Critical Notes”, Shinichi Tanimoto et. al, Shingaku Giho, EMCJ99-92, pp. 17-22, 1999.
However, when components are assigned based on component type, there is no differentiation between capacitors with high capacity for supplying low frequency current such as electrolytic capacitors and tantalum capacitors, and low capacity ceramic capacitors for supplying high frequency current in relation to main, large components (ICs), but rather all are simply treated as capacitors. For this reason, as with capacitors C
6
to C
8
(that have a lower capacity than C
1
to C
3
) in
FIG. 1
, the capacitors are assigned in clusters. Therefore the component assigning is not carried out appropriately, requiring the user to make revisions. Moreover, capacitors that supply higher frequency current should be placed closer to the IC power pin. However, it has become common recently for ICs to have a plurality of power pins, and also many pin pair combinations of IC power pins and power pins of pluralities of capacitors, making selecting and wiring suitable pin pairs difficult.
A CAD apparatus for confirming whether the placement of a bypass capacitor is appropriate is disclosed in Japanese laid-open patent application H10-07560 (Computer Aided Design System).
This CAD apparatus makes confirmation of the placement of bypass capacitors possible by displaying on the board the effective range for eliminating noise for each bypass capacitor.
FIG. 2
shows a display example of a wiring board being designed displayed on the monitor of the CAD apparatus disclosed in Japanese laid-open patent application H10-07560.
At this point, a bypass capacitor
2110
, an IC
2120
, and an IC
2130
have been placed on a wiring board
2101
shown in FIG.
2
.
The effective range for eliminating noise with the bypass capacitor
2110
is shown by an ellipse
2141
and an ellipse
2142
. Here, the ellipse
2141
shows the range in which noise elimination by the bypass capacitor
2110
is highly effective, while ellipse
2124
shows the range in which noise elimination by the bypass capacitor
2110
is moderately effective.
Designers, referring to these effective ranges for eliminating noise, can confirm the placement of bypass capacitors by judging whether each pin of the components placed on a wiring board is in an effective range for eliminating noise by a bypass capacitor.
Here, the 4 pins on the left side of the IC
2120
are within the ellipse
2141
, therefore noise elimination is estimated to be highly effective. The 4 pins on the right side of the IC
2120
are within the ellipse
2142
, therefore noise elimination is estimated to be moderately effective. None of the pins of IC
2130
is within either the ellipse
2141
or the ellipse
2142
, therefore noise elimination is estimated to be less than moderately effective.
However, in a display such as the above, as the number of bypass capacitors placed on a wiring board increases, the number of ellipses also increases. As a result, the ellipses overlap and the display becomes extremely difficult to see when the number of bypass condensers exceeds a certain level.
Furthermore, because each pin of a component has different operating characteristics, such as operation frequency, there are cases in which each pin conforms to a different bypass capacitor. In such cases, in a display such as the above-described, it is difficult to know which bypass capacitor is effective with which pin of which component, possibly resulting in errors in judgement.
In addition, capacitors have capacities, so even if the characteristics match, if the capacity is insufficient the noise elimination effect will be inadequate. However, in a display such as above, the capacity of bypass capacitors is not considered so it is difficult to detect if the capacity is insufficient.
Moreover, a judgement method using a display such as the above-described is inaccurate because the effectiveness of a bypass capacitor is judged by the linear distance on the surface between the bypass capacitor and a pin on the board. The reason for this inaccuracy is that the effectiveness of a bypass capacitor is not determined by the linear distance on a surface, but rather depends on the length of the path determined by the wiring pattern along which the harmonic content of the transient current flows.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is a first objective of the present invention to provide a CAD apparatus for performing component placement to effectively reduce electromagnetic radiation noise.
It is a second objective of the present invention to provide a CAD apparatus for easily confirming whether bypass capacitor placement is suitable.
A CAD apparatus that achieves the above-described first objective includes a determining unit for determining a component order in an ascending order of impedance of passive components amongst components to be placed on the printed wiring board, and placement unit for placing the passive components in the determined component order.
According to this construction, the passive components are placed in ascending order of impedance. The lower the impedance of a component, the higher the component reduces high frequency noise, so passive components are placed in order from high frequency noise to low frequency noise. The earlier a component is placed, the greater freedom there is in placement, therefore, the higher the frequency of the noise, the more effectively a passive component can be placed to reduce the noise.
Here, the placement unit places each of the passive components in a vicinity of a power pin of a non-passive component which is already placed.
According to this structure, high frequency noise in power pins that is caused by current can be effectively reduced.
Here, the determining unit may determine the component order using an ascending order of equivalent series inductance of the passive components as the ascending order of impedance.
According to this construction, the equivalent series inductance is used instead of the impedance of passive components, so that different types of passive components can be treated i

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Computer aided design apparatus for aiding design of a... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Computer aided design apparatus for aiding design of a..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Computer aided design apparatus for aiding design of a... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3113199

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.