Optical: systems and elements – Lens – With reflecting element
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-10
2002-07-23
Epps, Georgia (Department: 2873)
Optical: systems and elements
Lens
With reflecting element
C359S649000, C359S727000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06424471
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention concerns a catadioptric projection objective with an object plane, a physical beam splitter, a concave mirror, a image plane, a first objective part, a second objective part, as well as a third objective part.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Optical projection systems with great resolution are used for projection exposure devices, with which patterns of photomasks or reticles, which are designated below generally as masks or reticles, are projected or exposed on semiconductor wafers or glass plates coated with photosensitive materials. In order to further reduce the structural width, which is essentially limited by the diffraction-limited resolution, preferably DUV and VUV radiation with a wavelength ≦260 nm are used for projection of such small structures. Catadioptric systems are used for such projection devices as projection objectives, among others. Catadioptric systems permit a large bandwidth, whereby the costs of the laser exposure source can be kept small and the efficiency is high.
A catadioptric projection system with intermediate image has been made known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,636,066. Beam splitting is produced geometrically by means of a deflecting mirror, which is perforated in the center of the mirror, and represents a diaphragm for the beam reflected by the catadioptric part at the concave mirror.
The system according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,636,066 is constructed in such a way that the intermediate image is formed in the diaphragm plane of the deflecting mirror.
Another system with geometric beam splitter, which is designed as a deflecting mirror, has become known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,691,802. In the projection objective known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,691,802 with an intermediate image, the intermediate image is formed in front of the catadioptric objective in the first objective part. A disadvantage of the system known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,691,802 is the fact that this necessarily involves an eccentric system due to the geometric beam splitting.
A system with a physical beam splitter has become known from EP-A-0 475,020. The system shown in EP-A 0 475,020 comprises at least one catadioptric input system as well as a dioptric output system. The mask to be imaged is applied directly onto a beam splitter, which is preferably a prism. A part of the light reflected by the catadioptric system is deflected to the dioptric system by means of the beam splitter.
A disadvantage of the arrangement according to EP-A 0 475,020 is the fact that the object to be imaged is arranged directly on the beam splitter and the correction of the intermediate image limits the possibilities for correction of the entire system.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,302,079 is shows a system with a polarization-optical beam splitter. The change of the direction of polarization of the beam reflected by the concave mirror in the catadioptric objective part is varied by means of induced double refraction.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,896,952 shows a system with polarization-optical beam splitter, whereby the change of the direction of polarization in the catadioptric objective part is achieved by means of a &lgr;/4 plate.
DD-C-215,179 also shows a system with a physical beam splitter, which is formed as a partially transparent beam-splitting prism. The system according to DD-C-215,179 has two identical mirrors on two of the four sides of the beam-splitting prism perpendicular to a pregiven plane as well as two dioptric structural groups on the other two sides of the beam splitting prism. The dioptric structural groups are designed in such that the Petzval sum of the two systems largely compensates for that of the mirror.
A catadioptric projection objective without intermediate image has become known from EP-A 0 350,955, in which a first lens group or a first objective part is provided between the object, e.g., the reticle, and the physical beam splitter, a second lens group is provided between the physical beam splitter and the concave mirror, and a third lens group is provided between the physical beam splitter and the image plane.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,805 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,333 show a catadioptric objective with intermediate image and beam splitter as well as at least two partial objectives, whereby the partial objectives are constructed such that the intermediate image lies in the vicinity of the beam splitter surface of the physical beam splitter. According to U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,805, a physical beam splitter, for example, a beam-splitting prism, is used as the beam splitter; U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,333 also shows the use of a mirror as a geometric beam splitter.
A disadvantage of the system with a geometric beam splitter is the fact that this involves an eccentric system. Both the system known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,805 as well as that from U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,333 have a very high range of angle of incidence of the returning beams reflected by the concave mirror and impinging on the surface of the beam splitter.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,861,997 shows a system similar to U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,805 as well as of U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,333 with two intermediate imaging systems, whereby one intermediate image lies in the vicinity of the beam splitter, so that high angles of incidence occur at the beam splitter.
The main disadvantage of the objectives known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,302,079; U.S. Pat. No. 4,896,952; EP-A-0 350,955; DD-C-215,179; U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,805; U.S. Pat. No. 5,861,997; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,333 is the fact that the beams impinging on the beam splitter layer have a broad range of angles. This is true particularly for the embodiments shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,850; U.S. Pat. No. 5,861,997; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,333, in which the intermediate image is formed in the vicinity of the beam-splitter surface.
The image quality is reduced by the large range of angles of the radiation impinging on the beam-splitter layer, since the reflectivity and the transmission of the beam-splitter layer depend on the angle of incidence onto the beam-splitter layer and insofar different intensity distributions result for different incidence angles.
In order to avoid this disadvantage, EP-A-0 602,923 proposes providing a lens in front of the physical beam splitter, by means of which the radiation impinging on the beam splitter is made parallel.
A parallel beam path is also produced in the catadioptric projection system known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,771,125. A disadvantage of the objectives according to EP-A 0 602,923 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,771,125 is that the positive refractive power of the mirror is not compensated for in the catadioptric part. This means that in fact, the beam impinging on the beam-splitter layer is made parallel, but not the beam returning after reflection at the concave mirror. The beam-splitter layer is then loaded in a direction under larger aperture angles. This in turn has the consequence that a pure splitting into the polarization directions cannot be achieved. Double images and a loss of contrast result from this.
In order to minimize the angle of incidence onto the beam-splitter layer, DE-A 4,417,489 proposes arranging at least one convergent lens for making the light beam impinging on the beam-splitter layer parallel in the case of a catadioptric projection system with physical beam splitter on the object side in front of the physical beam splitter, and a divergent lens group with one divergent lens after the physical beam splitter in the catadioptric objective part, in order to compensate for the effect of the convergent lens for making the beam impinging on the beam-splitter layer parallel. Further, another convergent lens is provided on the image side after the beam-splitter prism, in order to compensate for the effect of the divergent lens group in the case of a beam returning from the concave mirror in double passage.
The disadvantage of the arrangement according to DE-A 4,417,489 is the fact that the correction of longitudinal chromatic aberration (CHL) is insufficient due to the over-correcting catadioptric objective part.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTI
Beierl Helmut
Ulrich Willi
Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung
Epps Georgia
Ohlandt, Greeley, Ruggiero & Perle L.L.P
Spector David N.
LandOfFree
Catadioptric objective with physical beam splitter does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Catadioptric objective with physical beam splitter, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Catadioptric objective with physical beam splitter will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2911965