Electric lamp and discharge devices – With electrical shield or static charge distribution means
Patent
1997-06-05
1999-09-28
Patel, Vip
Electric lamp and discharge devices
With electrical shield or static charge distribution means
335211, H04N 929
Patent
active
059593920
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to a cathode ray tube (CRT) display apparatus with reduced stray magnetic fields.
2. Prior Art
The picture on a CRT display device, such as computer visual display unit or a television receiver, is typically produced by scanning an electron across the CRT screen in a raster pattern. The picture is then sequentially generated by amplitude modulating the electron beam with an input video signal as the electron beam is scanned across the screen.
The raster scan is produced by deflecting the electron beam with time-varying magnetic fields produced within the CRT. The magnetic fields are produced in the CRT by energising line and frame scan coils mounted in a yoke around the neck of the CRT with line and frame scan currents each having a sawtooth waveform. The time-varying magnetic fields also extend beyond the confines of the CRT and the yoke and may radiate from the display device as stray magnetic fields. The stray fields can produce an unwanted deflection in neighbouring display devices. The unwanted deflections can produce undesirable visual disturbances in pictures displayed on the neighbouring devices. The stray field from the frame scan coil tends to produce more objectionable disturbances than that from the line scan coil. If the unwanted deflection is exactly the same frequency and phase as the normal deflection, then there is no visible interference. However, this is usually not the case. The following two arrangements are more typical. In the first arrangement, adjacent CRT displays are displaying pictures based on video signals in the same video format, but from different system units. Thus, the line and frame scan frequencies received by the displays are slightly different and are not phase-locked. The resulting visual disturbance is a dark (or light depending on the display orientation) bar slowly rolling up or down the screen. The bar is the result of the fast field change of the vertical retrace of the interfering display. In the second arrangement, adjacent displays receive video signals in different video formats, so that the related scan frequencies are different. Vertical retrace interference occurs in the same way as mentioned above in connection with the first arrangement, but this time at random phases so that the interference is seen as an undesirable flicker effect.
The above mentioned problems caused by placing CRT displays next to each have been solved by enclosing at least the electron guns and the yokes of the CRTs in high magnetic permeability, ferro-magnetic shields. Examples of such solutions are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,864,192 and EP-A-0 348 205. The shields prevent stray fields generated in adjacent display devices from entering the CRT. Conventionally, the shields are formed from Mumetal (trade mark of Telcon Metals Limited, Crawley, Sussex, England). However, Mumetal shields are relatively expensive, thereby mitigating against volume manufacture.
Another conventional solution is to mount cancellation coils on the yoke of the CRT in a CRT display device. The cancellation coils are connected in series with the frame scan coils. In operation, the sawtooth scan current flowing in the frame scan coils also flows in the cancellation coils. The cancellation coils are oriented to generate, as a function of the sawtooth current flow, a magnetic cancellation field in anti-phase with the stray field from the yoke. The cancellation field destructively interferes with the stray field to reduce the net magnetic field strength of the stray field. Thus, the interference effect on any adjacent display is reduced. Such coils do not prevent external field sources from affecting the display device to which they are fitted. Therefore, to be effective, all displays in an installation should be fitted with cancellation coils. The problem with this arrangement is that the cancellation coils complicate the construction of the yoke assembly resulting in a more expensive end product. Furthermore, the space occupied by t
REFERENCES:
patent: 4864192 (1989-09-01), Buchwald et al.
patent: 5563476 (1996-10-01), Smith et al.
Gerike Matthew J.
International Business Machines - Corporation
Morris, Esq. Daniel P.
Patel Vip
LandOfFree
Cancellation coil arrangement for reducing stray magnetic field does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Cancellation coil arrangement for reducing stray magnetic field , we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Cancellation coil arrangement for reducing stray magnetic field will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-706958