Electronic digital logic circuitry – Signal sensitivity or transmission integrity – Bus or line termination
Reexamination Certificate
1998-12-17
2002-08-27
Tokar, Michael (Department: 2819)
Electronic digital logic circuitry
Signal sensitivity or transmission integrity
Bus or line termination
C326S026000, C326S082000, C326S086000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06441638
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to technology for signal transmission between devices, such as a processor and a memory (between digital circuits formed by CMOS, for example, or between their functional blocks), and more particularly to technology for high-speed bus transmission among a plurality of devices connected to the same transmission line.
2. Description of Related Art
Among technologies for high-speed transmission between digital circuits formed with semiconductor integrated circuit devices, there is technology related to low-amplitude bus interfaces. Data output drivers used in the bus interface circuits are broadly divided into the open drain type circuits, a representative example of which is the GTL (Gunning Transceiver Logic) circuit, and the push-pull type circuits, representative examples of which are the CTT (Center Tapped Termination) interface circuit and the SSTL (Stub Series Terminated Logic) interface circuit. In data input receivers, the comparator type is generally used which compares input data with a reference voltage (Vref). The above-mentioned low-amplitude bus interfaces are described in detail in Nikkei Electronics, Sep. 27, 1993 issue (No.591) pp. 269-290, published by Nikkei BP.
With the progressive speedup of semiconductor integrated circuits in recent years, the rise time and the fall time of the leading and trailing edges of signal waveforms are decreasing, with the result that the waveform distortion due to mismatch of impedances is becoming too large to disregard. For this reason, as technology for eliminating the mismatch of impedances, the so-called matched termination method has been proposed, which terminates each end of the bus with a resistance equal to the bus line impedance.
FIG. 2
is a schematic block diagram of a bus system to which the conventional matched termination method is applied.
Reference numeral
50
denotes a main line of the bus,
51
a
to
51
e
denote stub lines of the bus,
52
a
to
52
e
denote drivers,
53
a
to
53
e
denote receivers,
54
a
to
54
e
denote modules,
55
denotes terminating resistors (Rtt) and
56
denotes the terminal voltages (Vtt). Reference numerals
57
a
to
57
e
denote branch points (connection points) of the stub lines
51
a
to
51
e
from the main line
50
.
In the bus system in
FIG. 2
, the drivers
52
a
to
52
e
and the receivers
53
a
to
53
e
are arranged in pairs, and those pairs are respectively contained in a plurality of modules
54
a
to
54
e
, and connected through the stub lines
51
a
to
51
e
to the main line
50
. The drivers
52
a
to
52
e
and their corresponding receivers
53
a
to
53
e
form the bus interface circuits of modules, each containing a driver and a receiver.
Though not illustrated, a logic circuit (LSI) for data transfer through the bus interface circuit is included in each module. Each bus interface circuit may be fabricated together with a logic LSI in the same chip or they may be fabricated separately.
Each end of the main line
50
is connected to a terminating resistor (Rtt)
55
that is connected to a terminal end voltage source (Vtt)
56
, by which matched termination is obtained.
As described above, in the conventional bus system, the bus interface circuits (receivers/drivers) are connected through the stub lines to one main line.
In the transfer of data in such a bus system, the time of signal propagation varies with the position of the modules (more specifically, the position of the bus interface circuits) connected to the bus.
For example, when data is transferred from the driver
52
d
to the receiver
53
e
, a data signal goes along the stub line
51
d,
passes through the branch point
57
d
to the branch point
57
e
of the main line
50
, and through the stub line
51
e
, and reaches the receiver
53
e
. On the other hand, when data is transferred from the driver
52
a
to the receiver
53
e
, a data signal travels along the stub line
51
a,
through the branch point
57
a
to the branch point
57
e
of the main line
50
, and through the stub line
51
e
, and reaches the receiver
53
e
. In other words, if the data propagation time is compared between a case where data is transferred from the driver
52
a
to the receiver
53
e
and a case where data is transferred from the driver
52
d
to the receiver
53
e
, the propagation time in the former case is delayed by a period of time corresponding to a length of wiring between the branch points
52
a
and
57
d
of the main line
50
.
The differences in propagation time among the modules at different positions become greater as the number of modules (more specifically, the number of the bus interface circuits) connected to the bus increases. The reason for this is that the wiring length of the main line becomes longer as the number of modules increases.
As the number of modules connected to the bus increases, the number of stub lines required to connect the modules to the main line increases, and accordingly the total capacitance of the stub lines increases, so that the effective velocity of propagation decreases.
In other words, the effective propagation velocity Vp′ of a signal, which propagates on the main line to which the stub lines are connected, decreases according to the amount of increase in the capacitance of the stub lines connected to the main line as compared with the propagation velocity Vp when there is only the main line (without the stub lines). The relational equation is shown below.
Vp′=Vp
/(1+
&Dgr;C/Co
)½ (Eq.1)
Where &Dgr;C is the capacitance of the stub lines as viewed from the main line, and includes the input capacitance of the modules connected to the stub lines. Co denotes the line capacitance between the branch points of the main line
50
on which a data signal propagates. From this equation, it is understood that the more stub capacitance &Dgr;C increases, the more effective propagation velocity Vp′ decreases.
In the conventional bus system, the above-mentioned problems hinder the attempts to achieve high-speed signal transmission.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention has been made to solve those problems, and has as its object to speed up the bus system and improve the system performance.
Specifically, the propagation time among the modules is shortened to thereby speed up the bus system and improve the system performance.
The noise of the propagating signal waveform between the modules is reduced to accelerate the speed of the bus system and improve the system performance.
In order to solve the above problems, according to a first embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a bus system for data transfer among a plurality of interface circuits, which comprises:
at least two main lines connected together at opposite ends; and
a plurality of stub lines provided on a one-to-one correspondence with the above-mentioned plurality of interface circuits and connecting the corresponding interface circuits to one of the above-mentioned at least two main lines.
The first embodiment of the present invention, due to the above-mentioned structure, has the following advantages over the conventional bus system using one main line.
(1) If the lengths of wire between the branch points of the stub lines from the main line are set to be equal, the length of the main line on which data travels when it propagates between the mutually remotest interface circuits can be reduced to almost less than a half of the distance it would otherwise have to travel. Therefore, the data propagation time between the mutually remotest interface circuits can be made shorter. Furthermore, the differences in data propagation time between the interface circuits can be reduced.
(2) In the propagation of data between the mutually remotest interface circuits, the number of branch points of the stub lines from the main line that the data travels can be reduced. In other words, it is possible to reduce the number (capacitance) of the stub lines that affect the data waveform a
Osaka Hideki
Suzuki Shin'ichi
Takahashi Toshiro
Yamagiwa Akira
Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP
Hitachi , Ltd.
Paik Steven S.
Tokar Michael
LandOfFree
Bus system and circuit board does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Bus system and circuit board, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Bus system and circuit board will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2916831