Telecommunications – Receiver or analog modulated signal frequency converter – Noise or interference elimination
Reexamination Certificate
1996-09-05
2002-02-05
Chang, Vivian (Department: 2682)
Telecommunications
Receiver or analog modulated signal frequency converter
Noise or interference elimination
C455S265000, C455S317000, C331S037000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06345175
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to preventing beat interference between receiving devices and, more particularly, to a receiving system which prevents beat interference between proximately situated receivers receiving a common radio signal.
An example of a receiver which receives radio frequency signals from a transmitter and converts them into an audio signal suitable for audio reproduction by, for example, a speaker, is shown in
FIG. 3
, wherein the radio signal Si is received via an antenna
2
of receiver
1
. The radio signal Si is filtered by band-pass filter
3
, amplified by high frequency amplifier
4
and filtered again by band-pass filter
5
. A mixer
6
generates a fixed band signal by mixing the filtered signal with a lower frequency local oscillation signal S
2
provided by a local oscillator
7
. The fixed band signal S
3
is further filtered by band-pass filter
8
and amplified by high-frequency amplifier
9
. This signal is, then, mixed in mixer
10
with another local oscillation signal S
4
generated by local oscillator
7
to produce an intermediate frequency signal of an intermediate frequency. An IF amplifier
11
amplifies this intermediate frequency signal and a detector
12
detects the amplified IF signal to generate the audio signal S
6
suitable for audio reproduction.
An example of local oscillator
7
is shown in
FIG. 4
, wherein an internal oscillator
13
generates an internal clock signal S
7
which is frequency divided by frequency dividers
14
,
15
and coupled to respective phase locked loop (PLL) circuits
16
,
17
. It will be appreciated that the internal clock signal S
7
may be supplied additionally to a control circuit (not shown) of a CPU or other processor as a reference clock. Each of the two PLL circuits in
FIG. 4
have the same construction in this example and each includes a phase comparator
18
(
21
) which generates a phase difference signal indicating a difference in phase between the internal clock signal and a local oscillation signal generated by a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO)
20
(
23
) and fed back through a frequency divider
21
(
24
). A low pass filter
19
(
22
) band-passes this phase difference signal to VCO
20
(
23
) which generates the local oscillation signal S
2
(S
4
).
Problematically, if two supposedly identical receivers include local oscillator
7
, the local oscillation signal generated by the local oscillator in, for example, receiver
1
A of FIG.
5
and interferes with the local oscillation signal generated by the local oscillator of proximately situated receiver
1
B, such as when receivers are used to provide useful information during a “walking tour”. This situation arises, for example, when the conductive housing of the receiver acts as an antenna and transmits the local oscillation signal. Attempts to shield the housing, or to insert an isolator between the receivers, or to split the antenna signal between the receivers
1
A,
1
B (
FIG. 6
) has been found inadequate to prevent the interference because some leakage of the local oscillation signal always occurs.
The problem described above is particularly noticeable when two local oscillation signals from different receivers have slightly different frequencies, which may be due to the physical characteristics of each receiver or the difficulty arising out of adhering to very close manufacturing tolerances. As shown by the frequency-domain graph of
FIG. 7
, for example, two local oscillation signals associated with receivers
1
A and
1
B may be set at the slightly different frequencies of 850 and 851 MHz. These local oscillation signals (
1
A,
1
B) combine to create high frequency interference signals (a, b) near the frequencies of 852 and 849 MHz, respectively. When a third receiver (
1
C) has a local oscillation signal at the frequency of 852 MHz, a difference (d) between this frequency and the frequency of the nearby interference signal (a) creates interference which manifests in the reproduced audio sound as a beat.
This “beat” interference arises conspicuously when receivers are situated proximate enough to receive the interfering signals. An example of this proximate situation is a tour group of people shown in
FIG. 8A
touring through a museum and carrying wireless receiver head-sets which receive a common radio signal of audio information about a viewed museum piece. Since these local receivers are tuned to receive the common radio signal, the generated local oscillation signals of slightly different frequencies are combined to generate mutual interference which is picked up by the other receivers, thus, causing beat interference. It will be appreciated that shielding the receivers by inserting an isolator or by splitting the antenna between a plurality of receivers in such a tour group is impractical because such measures would restrict the user's movement.
Since beat interference arises when local oscillation signals exhibit different frequencies, it is theoretically possible to prevent beat interference by using receiver components of precisely the same electronic characteristics for all receivers because this would cause the local oscillation signals in each receiver to have the same frequency. However, it is quite difficult and expensive to manufacture a plurality of receivers with the same electronic characteristics. Typically, an internal oscillator has a precision of ±5 [ppm], meaning that is such an oscillator tuned to generate 850 MHz will, in fact, generate 850 MHz±4.25 KHz. This problem is compounded when there are more than two receivers which need to be precisely manufactured, such as when a large group of users tour a museum with many receiver head-sets. Problematically, beat interference is audibly disturbing to such individuals, seriously diminishing the acceptance of such audio signal reproduction.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object, therefore, to provide an apparatus and method for preventing beat interference in the aforementioned environment.
It is a further object to provide an apparatus and method for preventing beat interference arising from mutual interference of a plurality of receivers.
It is an even further object to provide an apparatus and method for preventing beat interference caused by a difference in local oscillation signal frequencies among a plurality of proximate receivers.
In accordance with the above objectives, the present invention provides an apparatus and method for preventing beat interference among receivers by selecting either an external clock signal that is transmitted to all receivers or, if no external clock signal exists, selecting an internal clock signal generated internally by each receiver. With this invention, each receiver can receive the same external clock signal as other receivers and the local oscillation signal for that receiver may be set precisely to the local signal oscillation frequency thereby preventing beat interference from arising.
In addition, the present invention also provides a receiver system formed of a plurality of receivers coupled in parallel to form a relay. Each of the receivers selects the external clock signal transmitted thereto, and in the absence of the external clock signal selecting the internal clock signal, thereby setting each of the respective local oscillation signals to the same frequency to prevent beat interference arising from a difference of local oscillation frequencies.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4317220 (1982-02-01), Martin
patent: 5081705 (1992-01-01), Swanke
patent: 5347232 (1994-09-01), Nishimichi
patent: 5373254 (1994-12-01), Nakauchi et al.
patent: 5473767 (1995-12-01), Kardach et al.
patent: 5604928 (1997-02-01), Hamano et al.
patent: 5691737 (1997-11-01), Ito et al.
patent: 5745848 (1998-04-01), Robin
patent: 5852728 (1998-12-01), Matsuda et al.
patent: 5900757 (1999-05-01), Aggarwal et al.
patent: S58-103278 (1983-06-01), None
patent: H08-098197 (1996-04-01), None
Appiah Charles N.
Chang Vivian
Frommer William S.
Frommer & Lawrence & Haug LLP
Smid Dennis M.
LandOfFree
Apparatus and method for preventing beat interference does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus and method for preventing beat interference, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus and method for preventing beat interference will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2985518