Antifuse manufacturing process

Semiconductor device manufacturing: process – Coating with electrically or thermally conductive material – To form ohmic contact to semiconductive material

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C438S907000, C438S908000, C438S467000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06541363

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND
1. Technical Field of the Invention
This invention relates to integrated circuits, and more particularly to an electrically programmable antifuse with improved manufacturability.
2. Prior Arts
Antifuse is a nonvolatile switching device used in semiconductor integrated circuits. It has been extensively used in Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) and Programmable Read-Only Memorys (PROMs). A typical antifuse comprises a bottom electrode, an insulating antifuse layer and a top electrode. The bottom electrode provides a bottom routing channel while the top electrode provides a top routing channel. Separated from the bottom electrode by the antifuse layer, the top electrode of an unprogrammed antifuse has no electrical connection with the bottom electrode. Passage of a current sufficiently large through an antifuse can cause electrical connection between two electrodes. An antifuse is the basic unit in an FPGA chip to perform the switching function between logic modules.
In an FPGA or PROM chip, there are millions of antifuses. They are all expected to have a similar behavior. Excessive leakage in a single unprogrammed antifuse could be detrimental to the functionality of a whole chip. To ensure a high chip yield, the antifuse layer is required to have a low defect density. Because of its uniqueness, antifuse needs to fulfill more stringent defect density requirements than other conventional IC's.
Defects could be intrinsic or extrinsic. Intrinsic defects are the defects inherent in the antifuse layer. Extrinsic defects are introduced during manufacturing process. Intrinsic defects can be addressed only by a careful selection of antifuse material. Extrinsic defects, on the other hand, can be reduced by optimizing antifuse structure and/or improving manufacturing steps. Numerous prior arts have proposed antifuse structures to improve manufacturability. But during manufacturing process, they all introduce extrinsic defects to the antifuse layer one way or the other.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,914,055 issued to Gordon et al. on Apr. 3, 1990 described a process to make an antifuse structure by depositing a bottom layer of TiW
10
, a layer of amorphous silicon
12
, and a top layer of TiW
14
on substrate
18
. As is illustrated in
FIG. 1A
, amorphous silicon layer
12
is deposited in an antifuse via
20
, formed in a field oxide layer
16
.
FIG. 1B
illustrates another antifuse structure described by U.S. Pat. No. 5,196,724 issued to Gordon et al. on Mar. 23, 1993. According to this invention, amorphous silicon layer
22
is first deposited on the bottom electrode
10
, then the field oxide
16
is deposited and an antifuse via is formed therein. The top electrode
14
is deposited and patterned thereafter in the antifuse via
20
. In this antifuse structure, amorphous silicon layer
12
is planar. Hawley et al. described an antifuse structure in U.S. Pat. No. 5,308,795 issued May 3, 1994. As is illustrated in
FIG. 1C
, the bottom electrode
10
is formed first. Then the field oxide
16
is deposited over the bottom electrode
10
and a via
20
is etched therethrough. Then a planarized W plug
24
is formed by means such as Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP). This is followed by the formation of antifuse layer
12
and the top electrode
14
.
One common problem with these inventions is that the first interface
15
between bottom electrode and antifuse layer and/or the second interface
17
between antifuse layer and top electrode are subjected to harmful processing environment during the antifuse manufacturing. Here, the first interface
15
refers to the common area shared by the bottom electrode
10
and the antifuse layer
22
; the second interface
17
refers to the common area shared by the antifuse layer
22
and the top electrode
14
. Photoresist, etching medium, CMP brush or even “dirty” air are representative of harmful processing environment. Particularly, pattern-transferring process, e.g. photolithography, can introduce foreign particle and/or cause severe surface damage. For example, masking of the field oxide
16
can leave residue photoresist in the antifuse via
20
in
FIGS. 1A and 1B
. In the meantime, etching of the field oxide
16
will cause a roughened surface of the bottom electrode
10
in
FIG. 1A and a
nonuniform antifuse layer
12
in FIG.
1
B. CMP brush can also cause scratch on the W plug
24
in FIG.
1
C. Accordingly, the breakdown voltage of the antifuse layer
12
is not well under control. As a result, yield of the integrated circuit using these antifuse structures is questionable.
In order to overcome the foregoing disadvantages of prior art antifuses, a new antifuse structure is disclosed in the present invention. According to the present invention, the bottom electrode and the antifuse layer are not subjected to harmful processing environment during the antifuse manufacturing.
OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES
It is a principle object of the present invention to provide an antifuse structure with an improved manufacturability.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an antifuse structure with an improved yield.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an antifuse structure with a repeatable and controllable breakdown voltage.
It is a further object of the present invention to prevent the first interface between the bottom electrode and the antifuse layer from being exposed to harmful processing environment.
It is a further object of the present invention to prevent the second interface between the antifuse layer and the top electrode from being exposed to harmful processing environment.
In accordance with these and other objects of the invention, a new antifuse structure is described in the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments which are illustrated in various drawing figures.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an antifuse structure with an improved manufacturability. According to the present invention, the bottom electrode, the antifuse layer and the top buffer layer are formed successively in a friendly manufacturing environment. Here, a friendly manufacturing environment refers to a manufacturing environment without photoresist, etching ambient, CMP brush and slurry, etc. In one word, a friendly manufacturing environment would not introduce defects to wafer surface. The absence of masking, etching or planarizing eliminates any possibility of foreign particle introduction and damage to the exposed surface during manufacturing. Moreover, this forming step can be performed in a cluster tool. In a cluster tool the wafers are transferred in vacuum or clean air and therefore results in no foreign particle introduction. Hence, the bottom electrode and the antifuse layer are not subjected to harmful processing environment. In other words, the bottom electrode and the antifuse layer are formed in a friendly manufacturing environment. The present invention eliminates any possibility to introduce defects during manufacturing. The only possible cause of premature breakdown is from the intrinsic defects of the antifuse layer. Compared with prior arts, this antifuse structure has less defects and therefore an improved manufacturability.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5100827 (1992-03-01), Lytle
patent: 5166556 (1992-11-01), Hsu et al.
patent: 5373169 (1994-12-01), Macollum et al.
patent: 5380682 (1995-01-01), Edwars et al.
patent: 5449947 (1995-09-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5521423 (1996-05-01), Shinriki et al.
patent: 5573971 (1996-11-01), Cleeves
patent: 5574971 (1996-11-01), Cleeve
patent: 5831325 (1998-11-01), Zhang
patent: 5838530 (1998-11-01), Zhang
patent: 5913138 (1999-06-01), Yamaoka et al.
patent: 8-264653 (1996-10-01), None
Physics of Hydrogenated Amorphous SiliconI, Springer-Verlag, 1984.
Zhang et al. “An electro-thermal model for metal-oxide-metal antifuses”,IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 42, No. 8, Aug. 1995, pp. 1548-1558.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Antifuse manufacturing process does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Antifuse manufacturing process, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Antifuse manufacturing process will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3038892

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.