Antenna selection system and method

Telecommunications – Transmitter – Measuring – testing – or monitoring of transmitter

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C455S115400, C455S067130, C455S063100, C455S067110

Reexamination Certificate

active

10704430

ABSTRACT:
A system and method for wireless communication. The system can include a transmitter that transmits a data signal having a time period without data transmission. The system can also include a receiver including a first antenna, a second antenna, a switch that activates one of the first antenna and the second antenna, and a processor that estimates a first signal-to-noise ratio for the first antenna and a second signal-to-noise ratio for the second antenna during the time period without data transmission. The processor can control the switch to select one of the first antenna and the second antenna based on a comparison between the first signal-to-noise ratio and the second signal-to-noise ratio.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4539709 (1985-09-01), Conner
patent: 4539710 (1985-09-01), Dinsmore
patent: 4723303 (1988-02-01), Koch
patent: 4884272 (1989-11-01), McConnell
patent: 5465413 (1995-11-01), Enge et al.
patent: 5854986 (1998-12-01), Dorren et al.
patent: 5963136 (1999-10-01), O'Brien
patent: 6253067 (2001-06-01), Tsuji
patent: 6278877 (2001-08-01), Brederveld et al.
patent: 7099380 (2006-08-01), Feng et al.
patent: 2002/0118780 (2002-08-01), Hurley et al.
patent: 2005/0101252 (2005-05-01), Carvalho et al.
patent: 2005/0270412 (2005-12-01), Kamon et al.
patent: 2001285213 (2001-10-01), None
U.S. Appl. No. 10/694,039, filed Oct. 27, 2003, Seidl.
D.R. Pauluzzi and N.C. Beaulieu, “A Comparison of SNR Estimation Techniques for the AWGN Channel,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 48, No. 10, pp. 1681-1691, Oct. 2000.
T.R. Benedict and T.T. Soong, “The joint estimation of signal and noise from the sum envelope,” IEEETrans. Information Theory, vol. IT-13, pp. 447-454, Jul. 1967.
P.J. Bickel and K.A. Doksum,Mathematical Statistics, Holden-Day, 1977.
V.K. Rohatgi,An Introduction to Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, 1976.
Murota, K. and Hirade, K. “GMSK Modulation for Digital Mobile Radio Telephony,” IEEE Transaction on Communications, vol. COM-29, pp. 1044-1050, No. 7, Jul. 1981.
Pasupathy, S., “Minimum Shift Keying: A Spectrally Efficient Modulation,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 0163-6804/79/0700-0014, Jul. 1979.
Elnoubi, S.M. “Analysis of GMSK with Differential Detection in Land Mobile Radio Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. VT-35, No. 4, Nov. 1986.
R. de Buda, “Coherent demodulation of frequency-shift keying with low deviation ratio,” IEEETrans. Communications, vol. COM-20, pp. 429-435, Jun. 1972.
P. Galko and S. Pasupathy, “Linear receivers for correlatively coded MSK,”IEEE Trans. Communications, vol. COM-33, Apr. 1985, pp. 338-347.
G.K. Kaleh, “Simple coherent receivers for partial response continuous phase modulation,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communication, vol. SAC-7, Dec. 1989.
P. Laurent, “Exact and approximate construction of digital phase modulations by superposition of amplitude modulated pulses,” IEEETrans. Communications, vol. COM-34, pp. 150-160, Feb. 1986.
N. Al-Dhahir and G. Saulnier, “A high-performance reduced-complexity GMSK demodulator,” IEEETrans. Communications, vol. 46, pp. 1409-1412, Nov. 1998.
F. Amoroso and J.A. Kivett, “Simplified MSK signaling technique,” IEEETrans. Communications, vol. COM-25, pp. 433-441, Apr. 1977.
W.P. Osborne and M.B. Luntz, “Coherent and NonCoherent Detection of CPFSK,”IEEE Trans. Communications, vol. COM-22, pp. 1023-1036, Aug. 1974.
M.S. Hodgart and J.A. Schoonees, “A robust MSK demodulator through DSP,”Proc. IEEE 1992 S. African Symposium on Communications and Signal Processing, Sep. 1992.
K.H. Mueller and M.S. Muller, “Timing recovery in digital synchronous data receivers,” IEEE Trans. Communications, vol. COM-24, pp. 516-531, May 1976.
T.I. Laakso, V. Valimaki, M. Karjalainen and U.K. Laine, “Splitting the unit delay,” IEEESignal Processing Magazine, vol. 13, pp. 30-60, Jan. 1996.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Antenna selection system and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Antenna selection system and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Antenna selection system and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3729207

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.