Optical: systems and elements – Optical amplifier – Particular active medium
Reexamination Certificate
2001-08-14
2003-02-18
Hellner, Mark (Department: 2874)
Optical: systems and elements
Optical amplifier
Particular active medium
C359S107000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06522462
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
This invention relates to all-optical logic elements, and more particularly to the use of interferometers with semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOA) and multi-mode interference (MMI) devices.
Since photons travel faster than electrons, much effort has gone into trying to develop an optical computer or optical logic elements. Different approaches have been taken to developing optical logic and other elements of a computer. Most of these approaches have proven to be difficult to produce, expensive, or bulky.
Optical logic gates are using an interferometer are disclosed by Roberts et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,283.
FIG. 1A
is a prior-art interferometer-based exclusive-OR (XOR) gate. A continuous-wave light input is split into two branches to semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOA)
6
,
8
. Modulated input A is combined with the output of SOA
8
, while modulated input B is combined with the output of SOA
6
. Outputs of SOA
6
,
8
are combined to produce the logic-gate output C.
The logical input signal A combines with the output of SOA
8
, either constructively or destructively, depending on the phase difference. Likewise, constructive or destructive interference occurs where input B is combined with the output of SOA
6
. Finally, constructive or destructive interference occurs where the two interferometer arms are combined to generate the final output C.
SOA
6
,
8
have the same phase shift when A and B are at logic 0. The output C is a logical XNOR of A and B. SOA differ in phase shift when A and B are at logic 0 by &pgr;, and output C is the logical XOR of A and B.
FIG. 1B
shows the XOR function when the SOA's have a zero phase difference.
FIG. 1C
shows that the interferometer gate is an XNOR gate with a third continuous-wave input.
While useful, the counter-propagation of the logical inputs can feed back to the continuous-wave input, which may cause cross-talk among other gates that share the same continuous-wave signal source. Splitting of the continuous-wave signal power may not be the ideal 50%-50% due to geometry or orientation imperfections of the Y-junctions.
The parent application disclosed optical logic gates using semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) configured in a cross-gain modulation (XGM) mode. The parent application uses and multi-mode interference (MMI) splitters/combiners to better control optical power. The inventors realize that phase modulation may be used in place of gain modulation for the optical logic gates.
Optical logic gates are desired that employ phase modulation and interferometric techniques with multi-mode interference (MMI) devices for better optical power distribution and control.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4262992 (1981-04-01), Berthold, III
patent: 5004314 (1991-04-01), Booth et al.
patent: 5315422 (1994-05-01), Utaka et al.
patent: 5367586 (1994-11-01), Glance et al.
patent: 5537243 (1996-07-01), Fatehi et al.
patent: 5703975 (1997-12-01), Miller et al.
patent: 5751758 (1998-05-01), Kuwatsuka
patent: 5754714 (1998-05-01), Suzuki et al.
patent: 5798853 (1998-08-01), Watanabe
patent: 5815610 (1998-09-01), Tokano et al.
patent: 5825517 (1998-10-01), Antoniades et al.
patent: 5878181 (1999-03-01), Van Der Tol
patent: 5970185 (1999-10-01), Baker et al.
patent: 5999283 (1999-12-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 5999284 (1999-12-01), Roberts
patent: 6035079 (2000-03-01), Fields et al.
patent: 6069732 (2000-05-01), Koch et al.
patent: 6169824 (2001-01-01), Sigogne et al.
patent: 6377388 (2002-04-01), Sakata et al.
patent: 6462865 (2002-10-01), Chu et al.
patent: 0 898 348 (1999-02-01), None
Stubkjaer, “Semiconductor Optical Amplifier-Based All-Optical Gates for High-Speed Optical Processing” (2000), IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 1428-1435.*
Leuthold, et al., “All-Optical Space Switches with Gain and Principally Ideal Extinction Ratios”, IEEE J. Quant Elect. vol. 34, No. 4, 4/98. pp. 622-633.
Shin, et al., “An Integrated Hybrid Device for Binary-Phase-Shift-Keying Subcarrier Modulation”, IEEE Photonics Tech Ltr. vol. 12, No. 5, 5/00, pp. 516-518.
Pan, et al., “Dynamic Operation of a Three-Port, Integrated mach-Zender Wavelenght Converter”, IEEE Photonics Tech Ltrs. vol. 7, No. 9, 9/95, pp. 995-997.
Soldano & Pennings, “Optical Multi-Mode Interference Devices Based on Self-Imaging: Principles and Applications”, IEEE J. Lightwave Tech, vol. 13, No. 4, 4/95 pp. 615-627.
Lee, et al., “Theoretical Study of Frequency Chirping and Extinction Ratio of Wavelength-Converted Optical Signals by XGM and XPM Using SOA's”, IEEE J. Quant Elect. vol. 35, No. 8, 8/99, pp. 1213-1219.
Leuthold et al. “Multimode Interference Couplers for the Conversion and Combining of Zero-and First-Order Modes”, IEEE J. Lightwave Tech, vol. 16, No. 74,7/98 pp. 1228-1239.
Nesset et al., “All-Optical Wavelength Conversion Using SOA Nonlinearities”, IEEE Communications Mag, 12/98, pp. 56-61.
Kloch et al. “Wavelength Converters”, IEEE Trans. Electron, vol. E82-C, No. 8, 8/99, pp. 1475-1486.
Au Chi
Chang Shyang
Chu Tzu-Yih
Ma Abraham C.
Auvinen Stuart T.
Hellner Mark
Super Light Wave Corp.
LandOfFree
All optical logic using cross-phase modulation amplifiers... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with All optical logic using cross-phase modulation amplifiers..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and All optical logic using cross-phase modulation amplifiers... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3153289