Telecommunications – Radiotelephone system – Zoned or cellular telephone system
Reexamination Certificate
1999-09-24
2003-06-17
Bost, Dwayne (Department: 2681)
Telecommunications
Radiotelephone system
Zoned or cellular telephone system
C455S431000, C455S279100, C455S067150, C455S067700
Reexamination Certificate
active
06580915
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Hand-held cellular phones have caused significant interference with navigation systems in commercial aircraft. While the power level on a cellular phone may be adjusted down to as low as six milliwatts for perfect connections, the power output can rise to as much as 2 watts. A hazard nearly as important in preventing that of interference with aircraft navigation is the potential paralysis of the ground-base cellular system. The ground-base cellular system is designed for people driving or moving slowly on the ground and assumes that each user is only able to communicate with a handful of antennas. These antenna locations then agree which one has the strongest signal from the user and then carry the communication. An individual in an aircraft flying over a city could literally tie up one channel each in over a hundred antennas and this could cause a great deal of inefficiency and near paralysis in the ground cellular system. For this reason, and for the concern about aircraft navigation, it is a violation of federal law to use a cell phone in an aircraft.
Nevertheless, our society has grown so accustomed to the use of the cellular phones that aircraft passengers frequently use them illegally in flight. The rules on the ground have been relaxed to the point now that most airlines will allow the use of the cellular phone until the aircraft doors are actually closed. Many passengers assume that this indicates that the rules are just another bit of bureaucracy and are beginning to ignore them in flight with potentially disastrous consequences. Importantly, many passengers simply forget to turn their phones off when they board the plane.
Unfortunately, in spite of the hazard to the aircraft safety and ground communication systems, no commercial aircraft at present have a system for detecting the cellular phone usage and no one has taught a system for locating the cellular phone in the aircraft. If a cellular phone transmission could be detected, it is still now impossible to decide which of a 200-400 passengers is using the phone—especially when one is using one of the hand-free earpieces which are essentially invisible or look like a radio earpiece.
What is needed is a system for detecting the use of a cellular phone during any time in a flight and immediately giving a location so the crew can take measures to have the cellular phone turned off.
In addition, a means is necessary for locating laptop computers, which are “noisy” emitters. Some laptop computers, typically due to modifications and peripherals, can emit significant levels of broad band electromagnetic interference (EMI).
There are many patents teaching various methods of locating a cellular phone. Representative are U.S. Pat. No. 5,512,908 of Herrick, “Apparatus and method for locating cellular telephones,” and Dunn (U.S. Pat. No. 5,873,040), “Wireless 911 emergency location.” All of the location techniques have a common goal of locating an emergency call from a cellular phone and are designed to give a location within several hundred feet. These inventions would clearly not be useful in an aircraft as the total dimensions of a plane are within this limit of resolution.
Other similar patents such as Herrick (U.S. Pat. No. 5,625,364), “Apparatus and method for finding a signal emission source” are doubly inappropriate for use in an aircraft, as they require moving the antenna to use phase changes to triangulate to the source.
A very interesting patent is Jones (U.S. Pat. No. 5,670,742); “EMI protected aircraft.” Jones teaches the use of shielding in the aircraft windows to prevent cellular phone users from using them on the planes. One could imagine that the cost of treating aircraft windows might be cost-prohibitive.
Kratz (U.S. Pat. No. 5,877,630), “System and method for protecting an electronic device from electromagnetic radiation interference” teaches placing a detector inside sensitive circuitry. If the detector detects interfering radiation then it runs a test on the potentially effected circuitry to see if it was affected.
Lewis (U.S. Pat. No. 5,684,861), “Apparatus and method for monitoring cellular telephone usage.” This is essentially a usage meter that would be tacked on to a rental cellular phone. The meter runs when its circuitry detects cellular phone transmission.
The system of Levi (U.S. Pat. No. 5,678,200), “Independent wideband RF transmission detector for cellular telephone,” teaches a detector in a car which would shut off the stereo system when someone is using their hand-held cellular phone to make it easier to listen.
The invention of Pevler (U.S. Pat. No. 5,856,803), “Method and apparatus for detecting radio-frequency weapon use,” teaches a military defense system which continuously looks for the spectral signatures of intentional radio frequency interference. At the end of the specification Pevler mentions radio frequency interference detecting and cellular phone number recording it. He does not say what to do with the number, how one would use it for prosecution, how one would identify the offending passenger, or how one would locate the offending passenger.
Frey (U.S. Pat. No. 5,444,762), “Method and apparatus for reducing interference among cellular telephone signals,” teaches the use of an air cellular system which allows transmissions from the aircraft but is careful to use unused channels and is also careful to beam the signal in such a way that it will not interfere with ground base cellular systems.
Thus in spite of an obvious need, no one has taught any system for locating and identifying a cellular phone transmission within an aircraft.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4352200 (1982-09-01), Oxman
patent: 4716417 (1987-12-01), Grumet
patent: 5230085 (1993-07-01), Loposer
patent: 5343493 (1994-08-01), Karimullah
patent: 5444762 (1995-08-01), Frey et al.
patent: 5512908 (1996-04-01), Herrick
patent: 5625364 (1997-04-01), Herrick et al.
patent: 5670742 (1997-09-01), Jones
patent: 5678200 (1997-10-01), Levi
patent: 5684861 (1997-11-01), Lewis et al.
patent: 5742666 (1998-04-01), Alpert
patent: 5856803 (1999-01-01), Pevler
patent: 5873040 (1999-02-01), Dunn
patent: 5877630 (1999-03-01), Kraz
patent: 5883598 (1999-03-01), Parl et al.
patent: 5887258 (1999-03-01), Lemozit et al.
patent: 5920278 (1999-07-01), Tyler et al.
patent: 6052604 (2000-04-01), Bishop et al.
patent: 6236359 (2001-05-01), Watters et al.
patent: 6246675 (2001-06-01), Beasley et al.
patent: 6246884 (2001-06-01), Karmi et al.
patent: 6269243 (2001-07-01), Corbefin et al.
patent: 6314286 (2001-11-01), Zicker
Bost Dwayne
Gelin Jean A
Kroll Family Trust
LandOfFree
Aircraft internal EMI detection and location does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Aircraft internal EMI detection and location, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Aircraft internal EMI detection and location will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3105624