Abrading – Machine – Rotary tool
Reexamination Certificate
2001-12-26
2003-07-15
Hail, III, Joseph J. (Department: 3723)
Abrading
Machine
Rotary tool
C451S398000, C451S288000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06592437
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) systems and techniques for improving the performance and effectiveness of CMP operations. Specifically, the present invention relates to a hollow annular gimbal ring having internal gel suitable for providing gimbal movement of a wafer carrier plate relative to a carrier head.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the fabrication of semiconductor devices, there is a need to perform CMP operations. Typically, integrated circuit devices are in the form of multi-level structures. At the substrate level, transistor devices having diffusion regions are formed. In subsequent levels, interconnect metallization lines are patterned and electrically connected to the transistor devices to define the desired functional device. As is well known, patterned conductive layers are insulated from other conductive layers by dielectric materials, such as silicon dioxide. At each metallization level and/or associated dielectric layer, there is a need to planarize the metal and/or dielectric material. Without planarization, fabrication of additional metallization layers becomes substantially more difficult due to higher variations in the surface topography. In other applications, metallization line patterns are formed in the dielectric material, and then metal CMP operations are performed to remove overburden materials, such as copper metallization.
In the prior art, CMP systems typically implement belt, orbital, or brush stations in which belts, pads, or brushes are used to polish, buff, and scrub one or both sides of a wafer. Slurry is used to facilitate and enhance the CMP operation, and may be distributed by a combination of the movement of the preparation surface, the movement of the semiconductor wafer and the friction created between the semiconductor wafer and the preparation surface.
In a typical CMP system, a wafer is mounted on a carrier head, which rotates in a direction of rotation. The CMP process is achieved when an exposed surface of the rotating wafer is applied with force against a polishing pad, which moves or rotates in a polishing pad direction. Some CMP processes require that a significant force be used at the time the rotating wafer is being polished by the polishing pad.
Normally, the polishing pads used in the CMP systems are composed of porous or fibrous materials. Depending on the type of the polishing pad used, slurry composed of an aqueous solution containing different types of dispersed abrasive particles such as SiO
2 
and/or Al
2
O
3 
may be applied to the polishing pad, thereby creating an abrasive chemical solution between the polishing pad and the wafer.
FIG. 1A
 depicts a schematic cross-sectional view of an exemplary prior art CMP system. In this CMP system a carrier head 
100
 engages a retaining ring mounting plate 
101
 provided with a retaining ring 
102
. The retaining ring 
102
 centers a wafer 
103
 relative to a vertical axis of rotation 
104
 of the carrier head 
100
. The carrier head 
100
 is urged toward a surface 
106
 of a polishing pad 
107
 with a force F. As shown, an outer surface 
108
 of the retaining ring 
102
 is positioned above an exposed surface 
109
 of the wafer 
103
. Thus, while the exposed surface 
109
 of the wafer 
103
 is in contact with the polishing pad surface 
106
, the outer surface 
108
 of the retaining ring 
101
 is configured to not come into contact with the polishing pad surface 
106
, and is thus spaced from the polishing pad surface 
106
. The spacing of the ring 
102
 from the surface 
106
 allows room for the wafer 
103
, the mounting plate 
101
, and the ring 
102
 to tilt relative to the vertical axis 
104
 on which the carrier head 
100
 rotates. A typical gimbal 
111
 is provided as a spherical member 
112
 mounted in spherical sockets 
113
a 
and 
113
b 
of the respective carrier head 
100
 and mounting plate 
101
. One or the other of the sockets 
113
a 
or 
113
b 
is configured to secure the member 
112
 to the respective carrier head 
100
 or mounting plate 
101
.
FIG. 1B
 shows the tilt of the wafer 
103
, the mounting plate 
101
, and the retaining ring 
102
 allowed by the gimbal 
111
 in terms of an angle 
116
 between the vertical axis 
104
 and an axis of rotation 
117
 of the retaining ring mounting plate 
101
. The tilt allows movement of the mounting plate 
101
 for parallelism of a plane (represented by a line 
118
) of the exposed surface 
109
 of the wafer 
103
 and a plane (represented by a line 
119
) of the surface 
106
 of the pad 
107
.
Several problems may be encountered while using an “edge-effect” caused by the CMP system polishing the edge of the wafer 
103
 at a different rate than other regions, thereby creating a non-uniform profile on the surface of the wafer 
103
. The problems associated with edge-effect are twofold, namely “pad rebound effect” and “edge burn-off effect.” 
FIG. 1C
 is an enlarged illustration of the pad rebound effect associated with the prior art. The pad rebound effect occurs when the polishing pad surface 
106
 initially comes into contact with the edge of the wafer 
103
, causing the polishing pad surface 
106
 to bounce off the exposed surface 
109
 of the wafer 
103
. As the moving polishing pad surface 
106
 shifts under the exposed surface 
109
 of the wafer 
103
 (see arrow 
120
), the edge of the wafer 
103
 cuts into the polishing pad 
107
 at an edge contact zone 
121
. The cutting causes the polishing pad 
106
 to bounce off the wafer 
103
, thereby creating a wave on the polishing pad 
106
 as shown in FIG. 
1
C. Ideally, the polishing pad 
107
 is configured to be applied to the wafer 
103
 at a specific uniform pressure and to remain flat (planar). However, 
FIG. 1C
 shows that the wave created on the polishing pad 
103
 creates a series of low-pressure regions of the exposed surface 
109
 of the wafer 
103
. Such regions may include an edge non-contact zone 
122
 and an inner non-contact zone 
123
, wherein the removal rate is lower than the average removal rate. Thus, the edge contact zone 
121
 and an inner contact zone 
124
 of the wafer 
103
 are polished more than the other zones. As a result, the CMP processed wafer 
103
 will tend to show a non-uniform profile.
Further illustrated in 
FIG. 1D
 is the “edge burn-off” effect. As the polishing pad surface 
106
 comes into contact with the sharper edge of the wafer 
103
 at the edge contact zone 
121
, the edge of the wafer 
103
 cuts into the polishing pad 
107
, thereby creating an area defined as a “hot spot,” wherein the pressure exerted by the polishing pad 
107
 is higher than the average polishing pressure. Thus, the polishing pad surface 
106
 excessively polishes the edge of the wafer 
103
 and the area around the edge contact zone 
121
 (i.e., the hot spots). By the burn-off effect, a substantially high removal rate is exhibited at the area within about 1 millimeter to about 3 millimeters of the edge of the wafer 
103
. Moreover, depending on the polisher and the hardware construction, a substantially low removal rate is detected within the edge non-contact zone 
122
, an area between about 3 millimeters to about 20 millimeters of the edge of the wafer 
103
. Accordingly, as a cumulative result of the edge-effects, an area of about 1 millimeter to about 20 millimeters of the edge of the resulting post-CMP wafers 
103
 sometimes could be rendered unusable, thereby wasting silicon device area.
One way to compensate against edge effects is to use a gimbal, such as the gimbal 
111
. However, such gimbals 
111
 also suffer problems in that the complexity of the mechanical components of such gimbals makes them difficult to design and implement for symmetric repetitive CMP environments. For example, some typical gimbals 
111
 tend to vibrate in response to the forces of the polishing pad 
107
 and the wafer 
103
. The vibrations may introduce numerous potential problems to troubleshot when inappropriate CMP results start appearing in processed wafers 
103
.
Boyd John M.
Paterson Allan
Hail III Joseph J.
Lam Research Corporation
Martine & Penilla LLP
Shakeri Hadi
LandOfFree
Active gimbal ring with internal gel and methods for making... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Active gimbal ring with internal gel and methods for making..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Active gimbal ring with internal gel and methods for making... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3091513