SEU hard majority voter for triple redundancy

Active solid-state devices (e.g. – transistors – solid-state diode – Field effect device – Having insulated electrode

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C327S103000, C327S187000, C327S369000, C327S378000, C327S434000, C327S509000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06667520

ABSTRACT:

TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to the hardening of integrated circuits so that such circuits are immune to single event upsets (SEUs).
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Integrated circuits are frequently used in the presence of radiation such as x-rays, gamma-rays, photons, particles, etc. A radiation strike can deposit charge in silicon and, therefore, can cause upsets in the integrated circuits. The most common upset causes are from such particles as protons, neutrons, and heavy ions. As a result of such radiation, charges can be collected at circuit nodes that send the nodes to unintended opposite voltage states (e.g., from high to low). When this voltage state change happens to a data storage circuit, for example, the data storage nodes change to the wrong data states.
All circuits can tolerate some amount of deposited charge that does not cause a node to change states. However, all circuits also have some deposited charge threshold above which the node state will be changed. This threshold is referred to as the critical charge (i.e., Qcrit) for upset. Such node state changes are defined as radiation induced upsets. When radiation particles, which are particles that are discrete in time and space, cause a data upset, the data upset is referred to as a single event upset (SEU).
Various arrangements have been provided to increase the immunity of integrated circuits from single even upsets. For example, co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/034,808 filed on Dec. 28, 2001 gives several examples of SEU hardening techniques for preventing unintended data state changes in storage elements in response to radiation strikes.
FIG. 1
shows another technique to increase the immunity of integrated circuits from single event upsets. As shown in
FIG. 1
, an integrated circuit is provided with triple redundancy as indicated by instantiations
10
,
12
, and
14
of the same integrated circuit. The instantiation
10
of this integrated circuit is coupled to an input A of a majority voter circuit
16
, the instantiation
12
of the same integrated circuit is coupled to an input B of the majority voter circuit
16
, and the instantiation
14
of the same integrated circuit is coupled to an input C of the majority voter circuit
16
.
The majority voter circuit
16
provides an output on an output line
18
based on a majority vote between the inputs A, B, and C. For example, if the inputs A and B are the same but are different from the input C, then the output on the output line
18
is based on the inputs A and B. Alternatively, if the inputs B and C are the same but are different from the input A, then the output on the output line
18
is based on the inputs B and C. However, if the inputs A and C are the same but are different from the input B, then the output on the output line
18
is based on the inputs A and C.
The majority voter circuit
16
comprises a first inverter having a p-channel transistor
20
and an n-channel transistor
22
coupled in series between V
DD
and ground. The gate of the p-channel transistor
20
and the gate of the n-channel transistor
22
are coupled to the input A, and the junction between the p-channel transistor
20
and the n-channel transistor
22
is coupled to the output line
18
.
The majority voter circuit
16
also comprises a second inverter having a p-channel transistor
24
and an n-channel transistor
26
coupled in series between V
DD
and ground. The gate of the p-channel transistor
24
and the gate of the n-channel transistor
26
are coupled to the input B, and the junction between the p-channel transistor
24
and the n-channel transistor
26
is coupled to the output line
18
.
The majority voter circuit
16
further comprises a third inverter having a p-channel transistor
28
and an n-channel transistor
30
coupled in series between V
DD
and ground. The gate of the p-channel transistor
28
and the gate of the n-channel transistor
30
are coupled to the input C, and the junction between the p-channel transistor
28
and the n-channel transistor
30
is coupled to the output line
18
.
Accordingly, radiation may strike the sensitive area of one of the instantiations
10
,
12
, and
14
of the integrated circuit causing the output of that instantiation to assume an incorrect output state radiation. However, it is not likely that radiation will simultaneously strike the sensitive area of a second of the instantiations
10
,
12
, and
14
of the integrated circuit causing the output of this second instantiation to assume the same incorrect output state. Because it is not likely that radiation will strike the sensitive areas of two or more of the instantiations
10
,
12
, and
14
at the same time, the output on the output line
18
will be in the correct state because the majority voter circuit
16
will vote on a majority basis to select the inputs unaffected by the radiation and thus control the output on the output line
18
at the intended output state.
As an example, an SEU event may occur in a sensitive area of the instantiation
10
that causes the input A to transition from a low state to a high state so as to turn on the n-channel transistor
22
. However, as long as the sum of the drain currents in the p-channel transistors
24
and
28
is greater than the drain current of the n-channel transistor
22
, the output signal on the output line
18
will not change states.
Unfortunately, it is distinctly possible that the drain currents in the p-channel transistors
24
and
28
will not be greater than the drain current of the n-channel transistor
22
, particularly under worst case conditions, in which case the circuit of
FIG. 1
is not immune to SEU events. Also, even if the total drain current of the p-channel transistors
24
and
28
is larger than the drain current of the drain current of the n-channel transistor
22
, the speed of the majority voter circuit
16
of
FIG. 1
is adversely affected in a significant way due to the competition between the drain currents in the p-channel transistors
24
and
28
and the n-channel transistor
22
. Moreover, if a strong SEU event occurs in one of the transistors
20
-
30
, the affected transistor can turn on so hard that its drain current will overcome the drain currents of the other transistors and produce an erroneous output signal on the output line
18
. Thus, the majority voter circuit
16
itself is not SEU hardened.
The present invention is directed to a majority voter circuit that overcomes one or more of these or other problems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a hardening system comprises first, second, and third integrated circuit blocks and a majority voter circuit. The first, second, and third integrated circuit blocks have substantially identical circuit arrangements with respect to one another, and each of the first, second, and third integrated circuit blocks comprises an output having a signal thereon. The majority voter circuit comprises four transistors coupled to the output of the first integrated circuit block, four transistors coupled to the output of the second integrated circuit block, and two transistors coupled to the output of the third integrated circuit block. The majority voter circuit provides an output signal substantially equal to the signals on the outputs of the first, second, and third integrated circuit blocks that are in the majority.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a hardening system comprises first, second, and third integrated circuit blocks and a majority voter circuit. The first integrated circuit block has an output A providing a first signal thereon, the second integrated circuit block has an output B providing a second signal thereon, and the third integrated circuit block has an output C providing a third signal thereon. The majority voter circuit is coupled to the outputs A, B, and C and has transistors such that there is always a redundant off transistor to block the drain current of a transistor that is turned on by an

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

SEU hard majority voter for triple redundancy does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with SEU hard majority voter for triple redundancy, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and SEU hard majority voter for triple redundancy will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3141014

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.