Automated relationship traceability between software design...

Data processing: software development – installation – and managem – Software program development tool – Testing or debugging

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C717S106000, C717S144000, C717S102000, C717S140000, C717S101000, C715S230000, C715S231000, C715S232000, C715S233000, C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07735068

ABSTRACT:
Tools and methods are described herein that allows for measuring and using the relationship between artifacts of a software design, such as requirements, test plans, and so on. The relationship can be quantified by determining a relationship quotient for quantifying a similarity between components of software design artifacts and presenting the quantified relationships to a user, such as a software designer, so that he or she can account for the relationship between such components during design changes and so on. The relationship quotient is made more representative of substantive similarity by selecting the key terms that are to be submitted to a similarity analysis such that words that are too common in the English language, such as conjunctions, articles, etc., are not used. Ubiquity of certain key terms in an enterprise is accounted for by adding a term significance weight to the similarity analysis. The similarity analysis is made contextual, for instance, by the use of inputs from domain ontology including Entity Descriptions, and Entity Relationships.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5143627 (1992-09-01), Lapidus et al.
patent: 5364597 (1994-11-01), Polk, Jr. et al.
patent: 5500800 (1996-03-01), Talbott
patent: 5652835 (1997-07-01), Miller
patent: 5754760 (1998-05-01), Warfield
patent: 5772818 (1998-06-01), Polk, Jr. et al.
patent: 5949999 (1999-09-01), Song et al.
patent: 6318190 (2001-11-01), Radcliffe et al.
patent: 6415396 (2002-07-01), Singh et al.
patent: 6572824 (2003-06-01), Ostgaard et al.
patent: 7293254 (2007-11-01), Bloesch et al.
patent: 2001/0052089 (2001-12-01), Gustavsson et al.
patent: 2003/0145282 (2003-07-01), Thomas et al.
patent: 2003/0154071 (2003-08-01), Shreve
patent: 2004/0015819 (2004-01-01), Romano-Critchley et al.
patent: 2004/0054985 (2004-03-01), Sewell
patent: 2004/0088677 (2004-05-01), Williams
patent: 2004/0128292 (2004-07-01), Kinnell
patent: 2005/0097092 (2005-05-01), Annau et al.
patent: 2005/0166094 (2005-07-01), Blackwell et al.
patent: 2005/0172261 (2005-08-01), Yuknewicz et al.
patent: 2005/0262489 (2005-11-01), Streeter et al.
patent: 2005/0289524 (2005-12-01), McGinnes
patent: 2006/0005247 (2006-01-01), Zhang et al.
patent: 2007/0112761 (2007-05-01), Xu et al.
Dasgupta et al, “Variable Latent Semantic Indexing”, 2005, ACM, pp. 13-21.
Chen et al, “A Differential LSI Method for Document Classification”, 2005, ACM, pp. 25-32.
Sandler, “On the Use of Linear Programming for Unsupervised Text Classification”, Aug. 2005, ACM, pp. 256-264.
Gotel et al., “An Analysis of the Requirements Traceability Problem,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (ICRE '94), Colorado Springs, Colorado & Taipei, Taiwan, Apr. 1994, 8 pages.
Marcus et al., “Recovering Documentation-to-Source-Code Traceability Links using Latent Semantic Indexing,” 11 pages, International Conference on Software Engineering Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, Portland, Oregon, 2003.
Yu et al, “Multi-Label Informed Latent Semantic Indexing”, Aug. 2005, ACM, pp. 258-265.
Choi, “Advances in domain independent linear text segmentation,” Proceedings of the first conference on North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2000, 8 pages.
International Council On Systems Engineering (INCOSE) requirements management tools survey, http://www.incose.org/ProductsPubs/products/SEtools/tooltax.html, Sep. 22, 2004, 6 pages.
Goldin et al., “AbstFinder, A Prototype Natural Language Text Abstraction Finder for Use in Requirements Elicitation,” Automated Software Engineering, 4:4, 375-412, Oct. 1997, 38 pages.
Porter, Porter Stemming Algorithm, http://tartarus.org/˜martin/PorterStemmer/, archived Nov. 26, 2004, 4 pages.
Church, et al., “Inverse Document Frequency (IDF): A Measure of Deviations from Poisson,” Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. 1995, 10 pages.
“JTidy—Jtidy how to,” http://jtidy.sourceforge.net/howto.html, archived October 2005, 2 pages.
Prasad et al., The Penn Discourse TreeBank as a Resource for Natural Language Generation (slides), Workshop on Using Corpora for NLG, Jul. 14, 2005, 26 pages.
Prasad et al., The Penn Discourse TreeBank as a Resource for Natural Language Generation, Workshop on Using Corpora for NLG, Jul. 14, 2005, 8 pages.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Automated relationship traceability between software design... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Automated relationship traceability between software design..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Automated relationship traceability between software design... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4228008

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.