Co-administration of a tissue plasminogen activator,...

Drug – bio-affecting and body treating compositions – Immunoglobulin – antiserum – antibody – or antibody fragment,... – Monoclonal antibody or fragment thereof

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C424S130100, C424S133100, C424S141100, C424S153100, C424S173100, C424S094200, C424S094630, C424S094640, C514S822000, C530S387100, C530S387300, C530S388100, C530S388200, C530S388220, C530S388700

Reexamination Certificate

active

07655230

ABSTRACT:
A method for improving clinical outcome in focal ischemic stroke in a mammal by increasing cerebral blood flow and/or reducing infarct size is described which involves administering an effective amount of an anti-CD18 antibody to the mammal, in the absence of removal of the arterial obstruction.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4797277 (1989-01-01), Arfors
patent: 4840793 (1989-06-01), Todd, III et al.
patent: 4935234 (1990-06-01), Todd, III et al.
patent: 5002869 (1991-03-01), Schlossman et al.
patent: 5071964 (1991-12-01), Dustin et al.
patent: 5147637 (1992-09-01), Wright et al.
patent: 5322699 (1994-06-01), Wright et al.
patent: 5914112 (1999-06-01), Bednar et al.
patent: 7361344 (2008-04-01), Bednar et al.
patent: A-15518/88 (1988-11-01), None
patent: 2008368 (1991-06-01), None
patent: 289949 (1988-11-01), None
patent: 346078 (1989-12-01), None
patent: 379904 (1990-08-01), None
patent: 387668 (1990-09-01), None
patent: 438312 (1991-07-01), None
patent: 440351 (1991-08-01), None
patent: WO 90/10652 (1990-09-01), None
patent: WO 90/15076 (1990-12-01), None
patent: WO 91/16927 (1991-11-01), None
patent: WO 91/16928 (1991-11-01), None
patent: WO 91/18011 (1991-11-01), None
patent: WO 91/19511 (1991-12-01), None
patent: WO 92/22323 (1992-12-01), None
patent: WO 94/02175 (1994-02-01), None
patent: WO 94/04679 (1994-03-01), None
patent: WO 94/08620 (1994-04-01), None
patent: WO 94/12214 (1994-06-01), None
patent: WO 96/32478 (1996-10-01), None
patent: WO 97/26912 (1997-07-01), None
Aversano et al., “A Chimeric IgG4 Monoclonal Antibody Directed Against CD18 Reduces Infarct Size in a Primate Model of Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion”J. Amer. Col. Cardiology25 (3):781-788 (Mar. 1995).
Barron et al., “Use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the United States: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2”Circulation97(12):1150-1156 (Mar. 31, 1998).
Bednar et al., “Comparison of Triphenyltetrazolium Dye with Light Microscopic Evaluation in a Rabbit Model of Acute Cerebral Ischaemia”Neurological Research16:129-132 (Apr. 1994).
Bednar et al., “IB4, a Monoclonal Antibody Against the CD18 Adhesion Complex of Leukocytes, Attenuates Intracranial Hypertension in a Rabbit Stroke Model”Stroke(Abstract Only) 23(1):152 (1992).
Bednar et al., “IB4, a monoclonal antibody against the CD18 leukocyte adhesion protein, reduces intracranial pressure following thromboembolic stroke in the rabbit”Neurological Res. 18:171-175 (Apr. 1996).
Bednar et al., “The Role of Neutrophils and Platelets in a Rabbit Model of Thromboembolic Stroke”Stroke22(1):44-50 (1991).
Bose et al., “Evolving Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Cats: Spatial Correlation of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cerebral Blood Flow, Tetrazolium Staining, and Histopathology”Stroke19(1):28-37 (Jan. 1988).
Bowes et al., “Monoclonal Antibodies Preventing Leukocyte Activation Reduce Experimental Neurologic Injury and Enhance Efficacy of Thrombolytic Therapy”Neurology45:815-819 (1995).
Bowes et al., “Monoclonal Antibody to the ICAM-1 Adhesion Site Reduces Neurological Damage in a Rabbit Cerebral Embolism Stroke Model”Experimental Neurology119(2):215-219 (1993).
Chen et al., “Anti-CD11b Monoclonal Antibody Reduce Ischemic Cell Damage After Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rat Anti-CD11b Monoclonal Antibody Reduces Ischemic Cell Damage After Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rat”Ann. Neurol. 35(4):458-463 (1994).
Chen et al., “Neutropenia Reduces The Volume of Cerebral Infarct After Transient Middle Cerebral Artery Occulsion in the Rat”Neuroscience Research Communications11(2):93-99 (1992).
Chopp et al., “Anti-CD11b Monoclonal Antibody (1B6c) Reduces Infarct Size Resulting From Transient but Not Permanent Focal Ischemia in Rat”Stroke(Abstract Only) (19th International J), Stroke 25(1): p. 267, 1994.
Chopp et al., “Postischemic Administration of an Anti-MAC-1 Antibody Reduces Ischemic Cell Damage After Transient Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Rats”Stroke25(4):869-876 (1993).
Chopp et al., “The clot thickens—thrombolysis and combination therapies”Acta Neurochirurgica73 (Suppl.):67-71 (1999).
Clark et al., “Reduction of Central Nervous System Ischemic Injury by Monoclonal Antibody to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule”J. Neurosurg. 75:623-627 (1991).
Clark et al., “Reduction of Central Nervous System Ischemic Injury in Rabbits Using Leukocyte Adhesion Antibody Treatment”Stroke22(7):877-883 (Jul. 1991).
Clark et al., “Reperfusion Following Focal Stroke Hastens Inflammation and Resolution of Ischemic Injured Tissue”Brain Research Bulletin35(4):387-392 (1994).
Danilenko et al., “A Novel Canine Leukointegrin, αdβ2, is Expressed by Specific Macrophage Subpopulations in Tissue and a Minor CD8+Lymphocyte Subpopulation in Peripheral Blood”Journal of Immunology155:35-44 (1995).
del Zoppo et al., “Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes Occlude Capillaries Following Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion and Reperfusion in Baboons”Stroke22(10):1276-1283 (1991).
Desroches et al., “Regulation and Functional Involvement of Distinct Determinants of Leucocyte Function-Associated Antigen 1 (LFA-1) in T-Cell Activation In Vitro”Scand. J. Immunol. 33:277-286 (1991).
Eigenbrot et al., “X-Ray Structures of Fragments From Binding and Nonbinding Versions of a Humanized Anti-CD18 Antibody: Structural Indications of the Key Role of VHResidues 59 to 65”Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics18:49-62 (1994).
Fekete et al., “Involvement of Lymphocyte Function-Associated Antigen-1 (LFA-1) But Not ICAM-1 in a Radioactive Leukocyte Cell-Mediated Immunity (LA-CMI) Assay”J. Clin. Lab. Immunol. 31:145-149 (1990).
Fisher et al., “The Penumbra, Therapeutic Time Window and Acute Ischaemic Stroke”Bailliere's Clinical Neurology4(2):279-295 (Aug. 1995).
Garcia, “Effects of CD11b/18 Monocloan Antibody on Rats with Permanent Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion”Amer. J. Pathology148(1):241-248 (Jan. 1996).
Gross et al., “Delayed Tissue-Plasminogen Activator Therapy in a Rabbit Model of Thromoembolic Stroke”Neurosurgery36(6):1172-1177 (1995).
Gross et al., “Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Reduces Infarct Size After Experimental Cerebral Ischemia in a Rabbit Model”Stroke24(4):558-562 (Apr. 1993).
Hildreth & Hyman, “Production and characterization of Monoclonal Anti-CD18 Anti-Idiotype Antibodies”Molecular Immunology26(12):1155-1167 (1989).
Hildreth et al., “A Human Lymphoctye-associated Antigen Involved in Cell-mediated Lympholysis”European Journal of Immunology13:202-208 (1983).
Hutchings et al., “Transfer of Diabetes in Mice Prevented by Blockade of Adhesion-Promoting Receptor on Macrophages”Nature348:639-642 (Dec. 13, 1990).
Jiang et al., “Anti-CD11b Monoclonal Antibody Reduces Ischemic Cell Damage After Transient (2h) But Not After Permanent MCA Occlusion in the Rat”Neuroscience Research Communications15(2):85-93 (1994).
Jones et al., “Thresholds of Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Awake Monkeys”Journal of Neurosurgery54:773-782 (Jun. 1981).
Kim et al., “Adhesive Glycoproteins CD11a are Upregulated in the Leukocytes from Patients with Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attacks”Journal of the Neurological Sciences128(1):45-50 (1995).
Kohut et al., “Reduction in Ischemic Brain Injury in Rabbits by the Anion Transport Inhibitor L-644, 711”Stroke23(1):93-97 (Jan. 1992).
Kumar et al., “Recombinant soluble form of PSGL-1 accelerates thrombolysis and prevents reocclusion in a porcine model”Circulation99(10):1363-1369 (Mar. 16, 1999).
Lew et al., “Complement depletion does not reduce brain injury in a rabbit model of thromboembolic stroke”Brain Research Bulletin48(3):325-331 (Fe

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Co-administration of a tissue plasminogen activator,... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Co-administration of a tissue plasminogen activator,..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Co-administration of a tissue plasminogen activator,... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4216591

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.