Skin substitutes with improved barrier function

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Animal cell – per se ; composition thereof; process of... – Primate cell – per se

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C424S093100, C424S093700, C435S325000, C435S366000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07407805

ABSTRACT:
The present invention relates to in vitro cultured skin substitutes, and in particular to in vitro cultured skin substitutes that have improved barrier function. In some embodiments, improved barrier function is a result of improved culture conditions, while in other embodiments, improved barrier function results from genetic modification of keratinocytes. Improved culture conditions to improve barrier function include organotypic culture in the presence of linoleic acid and/or linoleic acid at about 75% humidity. Suitable genetic modifications for improving barrier function includes transfection with a DNA construct capable of expressing GKLF.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4485096 (1984-11-01), Bell
patent: 4707354 (1987-11-01), Garlen et al.
patent: 5536656 (1996-07-01), Kemp et al.
patent: 5658331 (1997-08-01), Della Valle et al.
patent: 5693332 (1997-12-01), Hansbrough
patent: 5968546 (1999-10-01), Baur et al.
patent: 5989837 (1999-11-01), Allen-Hoffmann et al.
patent: 5994115 (1999-11-01), Meyers
patent: 6039760 (2000-03-01), Eisenberg
patent: 6074859 (2000-06-01), Hirokawa et al.
patent: 6974697 (2005-12-01), Comer et al.
patent: 2002/0168768 (2002-11-01), Comer et al.
Goretsky,et al. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 1995, 3(4), 419-425.
Boyce, et al. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1996, 107(1), 82-87.
Ponec, et al. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1997, 109(3), 348-355.
Sando et al., J. Biol. Chem., 271(36): 22044-51 (1996).
Watanabe et al., J. Biol. Chem., 273(16): 9651-5 (1998).
Ponec et al., J. Invest. Dermatol., 109(3): 348-55 (1997).
Denda et al., J. Invest. Dermatol., 111(5): 858-63 (1998).
Hanley et al., J. Clin. Invest., 100(3): p. 705-12 (1997).
Hanley et al., J. Invest. Dermatol., 113(5): 788-95 (1999).
Zhang et al., J. Biol. Chem., 273(28): 17917-25 (1998).
deWet et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:725 [1987].
Smith and Waterman, Adv. Appl. Math. 2: 482 (1981).
Needleman and Wunsch, J. Mol. Biol. 48:443 (1970).
Pearson and Lipman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 85:2444 (1988).
Graham and van der Eb, Virol., 52:456 [1973].
Fuchs, J. Cell. Sci. Suppl., 17: 197-208 (1993).
Schurer et al., Dermatologica, 183: 77-94 (1991).
Aeschlimann et al., Thrombosis & Haemostasis, 71(4): 402-15 (1994).
Reichert et al., The cornified envelope: a key structure of terminally differentiating keratinocytes, in Molecular Biology of the Skin, M. Darmon, Editor. 1993, Academic Press, Inc.: San Diego. 107-150 (1993).
Sachsenmeier et al., J. Biol. Chem., 271: 5-8 (1996).
Hines et al., Promega Notes, 59: p. 30-36 (1996).
Anderson and Young, Quantitative Filter Hybridization, in Nucleic Acid Hybridization [1985].
Hines et al., J. Biol. Chem., 271(11): 6245-6251 (1996).
Polakowska et al., Developmental Dynamics, 199(3): 176-88 (1994).
Haake et al., J. Invest. Derm. Symp. Proc., 3: 28-35 (1998).
Wertz et al., Chem. Phys. Lipids., 91(2): 85-96 (1998).
Meana et al., Burns 24:621-30 (1998).
Baden, In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 23(3):205-213 (1987).
Boucamp et al., J. cell. Boil. 106:761-771 (1988).
Bell et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 76: 1274-1278 (1979).
Fusenig, Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions regulate keratinocyte growth and differentiation in vitro, in The Keratinocyte Handbook, I.M. Leigh, Lane, E.B., and F.M. Watt, Editor. 1994, University Press: Cambridge (1994).
Parenteau et al., Cytotechnology, 9: 163-171(1992).
Cumpstone et al., J. Invest. Dermatol., 92(4): 598-600 (1989).
Ponec, Int. J. Cosmetic Sci., 14: 245-264 (1992).
Mak et al., J. Invest. Dermatol., 96(3): 323-7 (1991).
Grubauer et al., J. Lipid Res., 30(3): 323-33 (1989).
Williams et al., J Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc., 3(2): 75-9 (1998).
Vicanova et al., J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc., 3(2): 114-20 (1998).
Aszterbaum et al., Pediatr. Res., 31(4 Pt 1): 308-17 (1992).
Hardman et al., Development, 125: 1541-1552 (1998).
Segre et al., Nat. Genet., 22(4): 356-60 (1999).
Stryer ed., Biochemistry, p. 17-21, 2nd ed, WH Freeman and Co. (1981).
Denyer et al., Drug Discov. Today 3:323-32 (1998).
Gonzales et al., Drug. Discov. Today 4:431-39 (1999).
Schroeder and Neagle, J. Biomol. Screening 1:75-80 (1996).
Mukaida et al., J. Immunology, 143:1366 [1989].
Roebuck, J. Interferon Cytokine Res., 19:429 [1999].
Iyer et al., Science 283:83 [1999].
Fambrough et al., Cell 97:727 [1999].
Eisen et al., PNAS 95:14863 [1998].
de Brugerolle de Fraissinette et al., Cell Biology and Toxicology, 15:121 [1999].
Berger et al., Secreted placental Alkaline Phosphatase: A Powerful New Quantitative Indicator Of Gene Expression In Eukaryptic Cells,Gene66:1-10 (1988).
Gibbs et al., Culture Of Reconstructed Epidermis In A Defined Medium at 33° C. Shows A Delayed Epidermal Maturation, Prlonged Lifespan And Improved Stratum Corneum, Arch Dermatol Res. Sep. 1997;289(10):585-95, Erratum in: Arch Dermatol Res Jan.-Feb. 1998;290(1-2):28.
Andraedis et al., Keratinocyte growth factor induces hyperprofileration and delays differtiation in a skin equivalent model system, FASEB 15:898-906 (2001).
Golub et al., Science 286:531 [1999].
Myers et al., A. J. Surg. 170(1):75-83 (1995).
Boyce et al., J. Invest. Dermatol., 107(1): p. 82-7 (1996).
Shields et al., J. Biol. Chem, 271(33): 20009-17 (1996).
Geiman et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 28(5): 1106-1113 (2000).
Mahatan et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 27(23): 4562-9 (1999).
Carroll et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90(21): p. 10270-4 (1993).
Lee et al., J. Biol. Chem., 271(8): 4561-8 (1996).
Yet et al., J. Biol. Chem., 273(2): 1026-31 (1998).
Lopez-Bayghen et al., J. Biol. Chem., 271(1); 512-520 (1996).
Perkins et al., Toxicological Sciences, 48:218 [1999].
Furutani et al., Nuc. Acid Res. 14:3167 [1986].
Mori and Prager, Blood 87:3410 [1996].
Corsini et al., J. Invest Dermatol. 108:892 [1997].
Elefanty et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 95:11897 [1998].
Morrison et al., Mech Dev, 1999. 84169 [1999].
Behne et al., J. Invest. Dermatol., 114(1): 185-92 (2000).
Asbill et al., Pharm. Research 17(9): 1092-97 (2000).
Allen-Hoffmann et al., J. Invest. Dermatol., 114(3): 444-455 (2000).
Chang et al., Am J. Respir Cell Mol Biol. 22:502 [2000].
Abe et al., Am J. Respir Cell Mol Biol., 22:51 [2000].
Jin et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 270:978 [2000].
Auger et al., Multistep Production Of Bioengineered Skin Substitutes: SEquential Modulation Of Culture Conditions, In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.-Animal 36:96-103 (2000).
Chilcott et al., Transepidermal Water Loss Does Not Correlate With Skin Barrier Function In Vivo, J. Investigative Dermatology 118:871-875 (2002).
Goretsky et al., Surface electrical capacitance as an index of epidermal barrier properties of composite skin substitutes and skin autografts, Wound Repair and Regeneration 3:419-425 (1995).
Boyce et al., Surface Electrical Capacitance as a Noninvasive Index of Epidermal Barrier in Cultured Skin Substitutes in Athymic Mice, Soc. for Investigative Dermatology, 82-87 (1996).
Vicanova et al., Incorporation of linoleic acid by cultured human keratinocytes, Arch Dermatol Res. 291:405-412 (1999).
Swartzendruber et al., Molecular Models of the Intercellular Lipid Lamellae in Mammalian Stratum Corneum, Soc. for Investigative Dermatology,92:251257 (1989).
Ponec et al., Lipid and ultrastructural scharacterization of reconstructed skin models, Int.l J. of Pharmaceutics, 203:211-225 (2000).
Gibbs et al., Temperature-sensitive regulation of epidermal morphogenesis and the expression of cornified envelope precursors by EGF and TGFα, Cell Tissue Res., 292:107-114 (1998).
Uchida et al., Vitamin C Stimulates Sphingolipid Production and Markers of Barrier Formation in Submerged Human Keratinocyte Cultures, Soc. for Investigative Dermatology, 117:1307-1313 (2001).
Boyce et al., Vitamin C Reggulates Keratinocyte Viability, Epidermal Barrier, and Basement Membrane In Vitro, and Reduces Wound Concentration After Grafting of Cultured Skin Substitutes, Soc. for Investigative Dermatology, 118:565-572 (2002).
Supp et al., Incubation of cultured skin substitutes in reduced humidity promotes cornification in vitro and stable engraftment in athymic mice, Wound Repair and Regeneration, 7:226-237 (19

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Skin substitutes with improved barrier function does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Skin substitutes with improved barrier function, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Skin substitutes with improved barrier function will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4012527

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.