Image analysis – Image enhancement or restoration – Intensity – brightness – contrast – or shading correction
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-22
2004-06-29
Johnson, Timothy M. (Department: 2625)
Image analysis
Image enhancement or restoration
Intensity, brightness, contrast, or shading correction
C382S168000, C382S266000, C382S261000, C382S283000, C382S298000, C382S308000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06757442
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to the field of digital image processing, and more particularly to a technique for enhancing the appearance of digital images, such as medical diagnostic images, to more clearly render certain image features while maintaining overall image intensity levels.
A variety of discrete pixel imaging techniques are known and are presently in use. In general, such techniques rely on the collection or acquisition of data representative of each discrete pixel composing an image matrix. In the medical imaging field, for example, several modalities are available for producing the data represented by the pixels, including magnetic resonance techniques, X-ray techniques, and so forth. Depending upon the particular modality employed, the pixel data is detected and encoded, such as in the form of digital values. The values are linked to particular relative locations of the pixels in the reconstructed image.
The utility of a processed image is often largely dependent upon the degree to which it can be interpreted by users. For example, in the field of medical diagnostics imaging, MRI, X-ray, and other images are most useful when they can be easily understood and compared by an attending physician or radiologist. Moreover, while a number of image processing parameters may control the final image presentation, it is often difficult to determine which of these parameters, or in what combination the parameters may be adjusted to provide the optimal image presentation. Often, the image processing techniques must be adjusted in accordance with empirical feedback from the physician.
The facility with which a reconstructed discrete pixel image may be interpreted by an observer may rely upon intuitive factors of which the observer may not be consciously aware. For example, a physician or radiologist may seek specific structures or specific features in an image. In medical imaging, such features might include bone, soft tissue or fluids. Such structures may be physically defined in the image by contiguous edges, contrast, texture, and so forth. The presentation of such features often depends heavily upon the particular image processing technique employed for converting the detected values representative of each pixel to modified values used in the final image. The signal processing technique employed can therefore greatly affect the ability of the observer to visualize salient features of interest. Ideally, the technique should carefully maintain recognizable structures of interest, as well as abnormal or unusual structures, while providing adequate textural and contrast information for interpretation of these structures and surrounding background.
Known signal processing systems for enhancing discrete pixel images suffer from certain drawbacks. For example, such systems may not consistently provide comparable image presentations in which salient features or structures may be easily visualized. Differences in the reconstructed images may result from particularities of individual scanners and circuitry, as well as from variations in the detected parameters (e.g. molecular excitation or received radiation). Differences can also result from the size, composition and position of a subject being scanned. Signal processing techniques employed in known systems are often difficult to reconfigure or adjust, owing to the relative inflexibility of hardware or firmware devices in which they are implemented or to the coding approach employed in software. Finally, known signal processing techniques often employ computational algorithms which are not particularly efficient, resulting in delays in formulation of the reconstituted image or under-utilization of signal processing capabilities.
Moreover, certain known techniques for image enhancement may offer excellent results for certain systems, but may not be as suitable for others. For example, low, medium and high field MRI systems may require substantially different data processing due to the different nature of the data defining the resulting images. In current techniques completely different image enhancement frameworks are employed in such cases. In addition, current techniques may result in highlighting of small, isolated areas which are not important for interpretation and may be distracting to the viewer. Conversely, in techniques enhancing images by feature structure recognition, breaks or discontinuities may be created between separate structural portions, such as along edges. Such techniques may provide some degree of smoothing or edge enhancement, but may not provide satisfactory retention of textures at ends of edges or lines.
With the advent of softcopy displays, problems have presented themselves which did not occur, or were less pronounced with conventional technologies. For example, in x-ray images rendered on photographic film, a light box was typically used by radiologists to read the resulting images, with excellent contrast and detail being provided by the photographic film. Where softcopy is desired, however, the same features may be less visible due to the limited dynamic range of the display device, or to the inherent limitations in rendering the detail in a manner that enables features of interest to be distinguished comparably to photographic film. This problem is particularly acute in view of the fact that softcopy displays are increasingly popular due to the archiving of large volumes of images in institutions, and to the facility of accessing the images for display at workstations where the radiologist will page through a large number of examinations during a reading session.
There is a need, therefore, for an improved technique for enhancing discrete pixel images which addresses these concerns.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an image enhancement technique designed to respond to these needs. The invention may be applied in a variety of environments, but is particularly well suited to medical diagnostic imaging, where image data is displayed on softcopy displays such as computer or workstation monitors. The technique offers the advantage of being applicable to both new image-viewing systems of stations, as well as to existing systems.
In a presently preferred embodiment, the technique first performs an image filtering operation, in which the structural elements in the image are ascertained and separated from the non-structural elements. The structural elements are then orientation smoothed to enhance structural features in these regions. The non-structural regions are homogenized to provide a background for the structural features. The structural regions may be sharpened and certain small features that are identified as noise may be smoothed or removed. Original texture can be added to non-structural regions to further aid in the interpretation of structural and non-structural features.
The technique then performs a non-uniformity equalization operation, in which pixel values are equalized from original values, while maintaining overall appearance of lighter and darker regions corresponding to higher and lower intensity values. Contrast enhancement is then performed based upon equalized values to render detailed structures more discernable.
The technique is particularly useful in magnetic resonance imaging systems, but may be employed over a wide range of modalities.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4747150 (1988-05-01), Knutsson et al.
patent: 4747151 (1988-05-01), Knutsson et al.
patent: 4747152 (1988-05-01), Knutsson et al.
patent: 5012524 (1991-04-01), Le Beau
patent: 5218649 (1993-06-01), Kundu et al.
patent: 5224177 (1993-06-01), Doi et al.
patent: 5343390 (1994-08-01), Doi et al.
patent: 5838835 (1998-11-01), Martens
patent: 5943433 (1999-08-01), Avinash
patent: 6069979 (2000-05-01), VanMetter
patent: 6195474 (2001-02-01), Snyder et al.
patent: 6424730 (2002-07-01), Wang et al.
patent: 6556720 (2003-04-01), Avinash
Gonzalez, Rafael C. and Richard E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, pp. 195-201, 1992.
Tekalp, A. Murat, Digital Video Processing, pp.
Choobin Barry
GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company LLC
Horton Carl
Johnson Timothy M.
Quarles & Brady LLP
LandOfFree
Image enhancement method with simultaneous noise reduction,... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Image enhancement method with simultaneous noise reduction,..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Image enhancement method with simultaneous noise reduction,... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3332124